No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Symposium Introduction: Complicating Law's Legitimation Processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium: Law, Democracy, and Society
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000
References
Abraham, David.
1996. Liberty without Equality: The Property-Rights Connection in a “Negative Citizenship” Regime. Law and Social Inquiry
21:1–65.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. 1991. Tripartism: Regulatory Capture and Empowerment. Law and Social Inquiry
16:435–96.Google Scholar
Brigham, John, and Gordon, Diane. 1996. Law in Politics: Struggles over Property and Public Space on New York City's Lower East Side. Law and Social Inquiry
21:265–83.Google Scholar
Engel, David.
1980. Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court. American Bar Foundation Research Journal
1980:425–454.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy.
2000. Bureaucratizing Democracy, Democratizing Bureaucracy. Law and Social Inquiry
25:1077–1109.Google Scholar
Gilboy, Janet.
1981. The Social Organization of Legal Services to Indigent Defendants. American Bar Foundation Research Journal
1981:1023–1048.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence.
1982. The Idiom of Legalism in Bar Politics: Lawyers, McCarthyism, and the Civil Rights Era. American Bar Foundation Research Journal
1982:911–988.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C, and Cappell, Charles. 1979. Indicators of Democracy in Professional Associations: Elite Recruitment, Turnover, and Decision Making in a Metropolitan Bar Association. American Bar Foundation Research Journal
1979:697–767.Google Scholar
Law and Social Inquiry (LSI). 1995a. Lawyering in Repressive States: A Symposium. Law and Social Inquiry
20:339–599.Google Scholar
Law and Social Inquiry (LSI). 1995b. Law and Lustration: Righting the Wrongs of the Past. Law and Social Inquiry
20:1–273.Google Scholar
Law and Social Inquiry (LSI). 1990a. Debate: Marxism and the Rule of Law. Law and Social Inquiry
15:633–730.Google Scholar
Law and Social Inquiry (LSI). 1990b. Symposium: Perestroika in Soviet Legal Institutions. Law and Social Inquiry
15:419–556.Google Scholar
Ledford, Kenneth.
2000. Judicial Independence and Political Representation: Prussian Judges as Parliamentary Deputies, 1848–1913. Law and Social Inquiry
25:1049–1075.Google Scholar
Rheinstein, Max, ed. 1954. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert Eli.
1989. Participation, Due Process and Responsive Administration: Handler's The Condition of Discretion. Law and Social Inquiry
14:323–359.Google Scholar
Rosner, Lydia.
1986. The Soviet Way of Crime: Beating the System in the Soviet Union and the U.S.A. South Hadley, Mass.: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim.
2000. Contradictions, Law, and State Socialism. Law and Social Inquiry
25:1021–1048.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan.
2000. Megan's Law: Governing through Crime in a Democratic Society. Law and Social Inquiry
25:000-000.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret.
1994. Rights, Rationality, and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship. Law and Social Inquiry
19:63–112.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. 2000. Multiculturalism and the Willingness of Citizens to Defer to Law and Legal Authorities. Law and Social Inquiry
25:983–1019.Google Scholar