Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:36:46.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Split Labor Market and the Origins of Antidrug Legislation in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Edna Bonacich's (1972) theoretical formulation of Split labor market dynamics as underlying the content and process of ethnic antagonism is expanded and applied to an historical analysis of the development of antidrug laws in the United States. The campaigns and resultant legislation against opium, cocaine, alcohol, and marijuana are subjected to a split labor market analysis that incorporates the notion of moral panics and an understanding of the ways in which law may be used as a “weapon” in the furtherance of class interests. The article concludes that each of these campaigns came about as the result of an underlying split labor market dynamic and adds to Bonacich's original formulation the response of criminalization of the threatening labor group by the higher-paid labor group.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadinsky, Howard. 1994. Organized Crime. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Adler, Jeffrey S. 1996. The Making of a Moral Panic in 19th-Century America: The Boston Garrotting Hysteria of 1865. Deviant Behavior 17:259–78.Google Scholar
American Federation of Labor. 1902. The New Chinese Exclusion Law. American Federanonist 9:275–97.Google Scholar
1905. American Federanonist 12.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, Joel Charles, 1983. From Theodicy to Ideology: The Origins of the American Temperance Movement. Ph.D. diss. Yale University.Google Scholar
Blair, Henry William. 1888. The Temperance Movement: or, the Conftict between Man and Alcohol. Boston: William E. Smythe.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1977. The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State. Socialist Revolution 7:3:628.Google Scholar
1980. Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects. Socialist Register 17:227–42.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Edna, 1972. A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. American Sociological Review 37:547–59.Google Scholar
1975. Abolition, The Extension of Slavery, and the Position of Free Blacks: A Study of Split Labor Markets in the United States, 1830–1863. American Journal of Sociology 81:3:601–28.Google Scholar
1976. Advanced Capitalism and Black/White Race Relations in the United States: A Split Labor Market Interpretation. American Sociological Review 41:3451.Google Scholar
Bonnie, Richard J., and Charles Whitebread, H. II. 1970. The Forbidden Fruit and the Tree of Knowledge: An Inquiry into the Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition. Virginia Law Review 56:9711203.Google Scholar
1974. The Marijuana Conviction: A History of Marijuana Prohibition in the United States. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Boswell, Terry E. 1986. A Split Labor Market Analysis of Discrimination against Chinese Immigrants, 1850–1882. American Sociological Review 51:352–71.Google Scholar
Boyer, Paul. 1978. Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. Craig, and Barbara, D. Warner. 1992. Immigrants, Urban Politics, and Urban Policing in 1900. American Sociological Review 57:293305.Google Scholar
California Development Association. 1928. Survey of the Mexican Labor Problem in California. California Development Association.Google Scholar
Calkins, Raymond. 1901. Substitutes for the Saloon: An Investigation Made for the Committee of Fifty. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William J. 1995. Crime Control and Ethnic Minorities: Legitimizing Racial Oppression by Creating Moral Panics. In Ethnicity, Race, and Crime: Perspective Across Time and Place, ed. Darnell Hawkins, F. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
City and County of San Francisco. 1901. Of the Chinese Exclusion Law: California's Memorial to the President and the Congress of die United States, Adopted by the Chinese Exclusion Convention. San Francisco: Star Press.Google Scholar
The Cocain Habit. 1901. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2 February 2.Google Scholar
Cocaine Sniffers: Use of Drug Increasing among Negroes of the South. 1903. New York Tribune, 21 June.Google Scholar
Cocaine User Shoots 7: Arkansas Negro Is afterward Killed by a Posse. 1907. New York Times, 6 December.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley. 1972. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
Committee of Fifty. 1882. Address by the Committee of Fifty to the People. Microfilmed as part of “Chinese in California.” Vol. 1. Bancroft Library Collection: University of California, Berkeley .Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 1914 Sixty-third Congress, Second Session. Vol. 51, pts. 14, 16. Cychpaedia of Temperance and Prohibition: A Reference Book of Facts, Staastics, and General Information on AR Phases of the Drink Question, the Temperance Movement, and the Prohibition Agitation. 1891. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Dike, Norman S. 1930. Aliens and Crime. In The Alien in Our Midst: Or, “Selling Our Birthright for a Mess of Pottage”: The Written Views of a Number of Americans (Present and Former) on Immigration and Its Results, ed. Grant, Madison and Davison, Chas Steward. New York: Galton Publishing.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elson, John 1993. The Great Migration. Time 142 (21):2833.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Larry, 1979. Intemperance: The Lost War against Liquor. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai T. 1966. Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Erie, Steven P., 1988. Rainbow's End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Albert S. 1873. A Cruise on the Barbary Coast. In A la California: Sketch of Life in the Golden State. San Francisco: A. L. Bancroft. (Available on-line at the Museum of the City of San Francisco at http://www.sfmuseum.org.).Google Scholar
Ewing, George W. 1977. The Well-Tempered Lyre: Songs and Verse of the Temperance Movement. Dallas, Tx.: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Mark. 1978. Crime Waves as Ideology. Social Problems 25:531–53.Google Scholar
Gompers, Samuel, and Gutstadt, Herman. 1902. Meat vs. Rice: American Manhood Against Asiatic Coolieism: Which Shall Survive? San Francisco: American Federation of Labor; Asiatic Exclusion League.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Juan L. Jr. 1985. Mexican and Mexican-American Farm Workers: The California Agricultural Industry. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Goode, Erich. 1993. Drugs in American Society. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goode, Erich, and Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1994a. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1994b. Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction. Annual Review of Sociology 20:149–71.Google Scholar
Guerin-Gonzales, Camille. 1994 Mexican Workers and American Dreams: Immigration, Repatriation, and California Farm Labor, 1900–1939. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Gusfteld, Joseph R. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Harring, Sidney L. 1977. Class Conflict and the Suppression of Tramps in Buffalo, 1892–1894. Law and Society 11:873911.Google Scholar
Hayes, E. A. 1909. Exclusion of Chinese and Other Asiatics. Speech given in the House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., 25 February.Google Scholar
Helmer, John. 1975. Drugs and Minority Oppression. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Howell, Frances Baseden. 1982. A Split Labor Market: Mexican Farm Workers in the Southwest. Sociological Inquiry 52 (2): 132–40.Google Scholar
Irwin, John, 1985. The Jail: Managing the Underclass in American Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, John. 1983. The Hardest Drug: Heroin and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karson, Marc, and Radosh, Ronald. 1968. The American Federation of Labor and the Negro Worker, 1894–1949. In The Negro and the American Labor Movement, ed. Jacobson, Julius. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor.Google Scholar
Kinder, Douglas Clark. 1992. Shutting Out the Evil: Nativism and Narcotics Control in the United States. In Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical and Comparative Per-spective, ed. Walker, William O. III. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Koren, John. 1899. Economic Aspects of the Liquor Problem: An InvestigationMade for the Committee of Fifty. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Latimer, Dean, and Goldberg, Jeff. 1981. Flowers in the Blood: The Story of Opium. New York: Franklin Watts.Google Scholar
Leiberson, Stanley, and Arnold, L. Silverman. 1965. The Precipitants and Underlying Conditions of Race Riots. American Sociological Review 30:887–98.Google Scholar
Levine, Harry Gene. 1985. The Birth of American Alcohol Control: Prohibition, the Power Elite, and the Problem of Lawlessness. Contemporary Drug Problems 12:63115.Google Scholar
Lindesmith, Alfred R. 1967. The Addict and the Law. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mahony, T. F. 1930. Problem of the Mexican Wage Earner. Address given at the Catholic Conference on Industrial Problems, Denver, 12 May.Google Scholar
McGarrell, Edmund F., and Thomas, C. Castellano. 1991. An Integrative Conflict Model of the Criminal Law Formation Process. Joumal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 28:174–96.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Carey. 1946. Southern California: An Islandon the Land. Salt Lake City: Gibbs-Smith.Google Scholar
Mechanics' State Council of California. 1868. Communication: Anti-Coolie Memorial. Microftlmed as part of “Chinese in California.” Vol. 1. Bancroft Library Collection, University of California, Berkeley .Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Musto, David. 1973. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Martha A. 1987. Economic Inequality and Discrimination in Sentencing. Social Forces 65:746–66.Google Scholar
1990. Economic Threat and Racial Disparities in Incarceration: The Case of Postbellum Georgia. Criminology 28:4:627–56.Google Scholar
1993. Ineauality and the Punishment of Minor Offenders in the Early 20th Century. Law and Society Review 27:2:313–43.Google Scholar
National Temperance Offering. [1850] 1975. The Sparkling Bowl. Micropublished (microfilm) in American Poetry 1609–1900: Segment II. New Haven, Conn.: Research Publications.Google Scholar
New Mexico Moves to Ban Marijuana: State Finds Many Children Are Addicted to Weed-Narcotics Law Passed. 1935. New York Times, 14 April.Google Scholar
New York Times 1935. Quotas. 15 September.Google Scholar
Opium and the Lottery: Children at Chinese Lotteries and White Women in Opium Dens. 1876. Sacramento Daily Record'Union, 23 February.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1974. Internationalisation of Capitalist Relations and the Nation-State. Economy and Society 3:2:145–79.Google Scholar
1978. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Quinney, Richard. 1970. The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rumbarger, John J. 1989. Profits, Power, and Prohibition: Alcohol Reform and the Industrializing of America, 1800–1930. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., and John, H. Laub. 1993. Structural Variations in Juvenile Court Processing: Ineauality, the Underclass, and Social Control. Law and Society Review 27:2:285311.Google Scholar
San Francisco Post. 1879. 1 March.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Andrew. 1962. Era of Excess: A Social History of the Prohibition Movement. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Spero, Sterling D., and Abram, L. Harris. 1968. The Black Worker: The Negro and the Labor Movement. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Starr, M. B. 1873. The Coming Struggle; What the People of the Pacific Coast Think of the Coolie Invasion. San Francisco: Bacon.Google Scholar
Tittle, Charles R., and Curran, Debra. 1988. Contingencies for Dispositional Disparities in Juvenile Justice. Social Forces 67:1:2358.Google Scholar
Turk, Austin T. 1976. Law as a Weapon in Social Conflict. Social Problems 23:276–91.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H., Royce Singleton, Jr., and Musick, David. 1984. Oppression: A Socio-History of Black-White Relations in America. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Use of Marijuana Spreading in the West. 1934. New York Times 16 September.Google Scholar
Virts, Nancy Lynn. 1985. Plantations, Land Tenure and Efficiency in the Postbellum South: The Effects of Emancipation on Southern Agriculture. Ph.D. diss. University of California–Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wiley, Harvey W. and Lewis Pierce, Anne. 1914. The Cocain Crime. Good Housekeeping 58 (3).Google Scholar
Williams, Edward Huntington. 1914. The Drug-Habit Menace in the South. Medical Record 85:247–49.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woodman, Harold D. 1995. New South, New Law: The Legal Foundations of Credit and Labor Relations in the Postbellum Agricultural South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar