Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:26:28.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signs Taken for Wonders: Community, Identity, and A History of Sumptuary Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Peter Goodrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , Summer 1998 , pp. 707 - 728
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amboise, A. 1620. Discours ou traicte des Devises. Paris: R. Boutonne.Google Scholar
Anonymous, 1595. A Glasse to View the Pride of Vainglorious Women: Containing: A Pleasant Invective against the Fantastical Foreigne Toyes, Daylie Used in Womens Apparell. London: Richard Iohnes.Google Scholar
Aston, Margaret. 1988. England's Iconoclasts: Laws against Images. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolus of Sassaferato 1485. Tractatus de insigniis et armis. In Consilia. Venice: N.p. Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1996. The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen, and Hunt, Alan. 1979. Marx and Engels on Law. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Calfhill, James. 1565. An Answere to the Treatise of the Cross. London: Denham.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas 183031] 1987. Sartor Resartus. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Court Dress: A Consultation Paper Issued on Behalf of the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice. 1993. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1979. The Postcard. From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges 1987. La Couleur de Chair ou le Paradoxe de Tertullien. Nouvelle Revue de Psychanalyse 35:9.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1976. Selected Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press. Downing, Calybute. 1632. A Discourse of the State Ecclesiasticall of this Kingdome in Relation to the Civill Oxford: Turner.Google Scholar
Dugdale, William. 1666. Origines Juridiciales or Historical Memorials of the English Laws. Savoy, England: T. Newcomb.Google Scholar
Eire, Carlos. 1986. War against the Idol: The Reformation of Worship from Erasmus to Calvin. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Estienne, Henri. 1643. The Art of Making Devises: Treating of Hieroglyphicks, Symboles, Emblems, Aenigmes, Sentences, Parables etc. London: J. Holden.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshona. 1997. Forms of Judicial Blindness, or the Evidence of What Cannot Be Seen: Traumatic Narratives and Legal Repetitions in the O. J. Simpson Case and in Tolstoy's The Kreutzer Sonata. Critical Inquiry 23:738.Google Scholar
Ferne, John. 1586. The Blazon of Gentrie. London: J. Winder.Google Scholar
Fleta. 1955 edition. ed. Richardson, M. G. and Sayles, G. O. London: Selden Society.Google Scholar
Fortescue, John [1466] 1869. De Natura legis naturae et de eius censura in successione regnorum supremum . In The Works of Sir John Fortescue, Knight. London: Private Distribution Google Scholar
Fortescue, John [1460] 1737. De Laudibus legum Angliae. London: Gosling.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality, ed. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. Hempstead, Hemel England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Fox, G. 1655. The Woman Learning in Silence or, the Mysterie of Womans Subjection to Her Husband. London: T. Symmonds.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1992. Languages of Law. From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1995. Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1996. Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. ed. and trans. 1997. Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1633. Bethel or, A Forme for Families. London: Jacob Bloome.Google Scholar
Gruzinski, Serge. 1990. La Guerre des Images. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Guillim, John. 1610. A Display of Heraldry Manifesting a More Easie Access to the Knowledge Therof. London: Roycroft.Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry. 1646. Of Idolatry. Oxford: H. Hall.Google Scholar
Hermer, Joe, and Hunt, Alan. 1996. Official Graffiti of the Everyday. Law B Society. Review 30:455.Google Scholar
Hull, N. E. H. 1996. The Romantic Realist: Art, Literature and the Enduring Legacy of Karl Llewellyn's Jurisprudence. American Journal of Legal History 40:115.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1991. Marxism, Law, Legal Theory, and Jurisprudence. In Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence, ed. Fitzpatrick, Peter, pp. 102–32. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jewel, John. 1564. An Apologie or Answere in Defence of the Churche of Englande London: n.p. Google Scholar
Jewel, John. 1567. A Defence of the Apologie of the Churche of England. London: Fleetstreet.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernest. 1957. The King's Two Bodies. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre. 1985. & Lcar; Inestimable objet de la transmission. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre. 1988. Le Désir politique de Dieu. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre. 1997. The Judge Amongst the Interpreters: Psychoanalysis and Legal Judgment. In Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader, ed. and trans Goodrich, Peter, pp. 164–210. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre. 1997. The Masters of Law: A Study of the Dogmatic Function. In Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader, ed. and trans Goodrich, Peter, pp. 98–133. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Legh, Gerard. 1562. The Accedens of Armory. London: Richard Totell.Google Scholar
Logan, John. 1677. Analogia Honorum or a Treatise of Honour and Nobility According to the Laws and Customs of England. London: Roycroft.Google Scholar
Martial, John. 1564. A Treatyse of the Crosse Gathered out of the Scriptures, Councelles and Auncient Fathers of the Primitive Church. Antwerp: I. Latius.Google Scholar
Mondzain, Marie-José 1996. Image, Icône, Economie. Les Sources Byzantines de & lcar; Imaginaire Contemporain. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Murphy, W. Tim 1997. The Oldest Social Science! Configurations of Law and Modernity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Robert. 1607. A Scholasticall Discourse against Symbolizing with Antichrist in Ceremonies. N.p. Google Scholar
Perkins, William. 1601. A Warning against Idolatrie of the Last Times. Cambridge, England: J. Legat.Google Scholar
Perkins, William. 1609. Christian Oeconomie: Or a Short Survey of the Right Manner of Erecting and Ordering a Familly, According to the Scriptures. Cambridge, England: Cantrell Legge.Google Scholar
Rastall, Master Justice. 1603. A Collection in English, of the Statutes Now in Force. London: T. Wight.Google Scholar
Rastell, John [1526] 1602. An Exposition of Certaine Difficult and Obscure Words, and Terms of the Lawes of this Realme. London: T. Wright.Google Scholar
Ridley, Thomas. 1617. A View of the Civille and Ecclesiasticall Law. Oxford: H. Hall.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., and Donaldson, J., eds. 1869. Ante-Nicene Christian Library. Edinburgh, Scotland: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Rose, Niklas, and Miller, Peter. 1992. Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology 43:172.Google Scholar
Sander, N. 1624. A Treatise of the Images of Christ and of His Saints. Omers, England: Heigham.Google Scholar
Schütz, Anton 1995. Sons of Writ, Sons of Wrath. Cardozo Law Review 16:979.Google Scholar
Selden, John. 1614. Titles of Honour. London: Stansby.Google Scholar
Selden, John. 1654. Aspilogia. London: Martin and Allestry.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Thomas. 1656. A Fortresse of the Faith First Planted Among Us Englishmen, and Continued by the Universal Church of Christ. Antwerp: J. Laet.Google Scholar
Tertullian, 1869a. Apologeticus. Vol. 10 of Roberts and Donaldson 1869.Google Scholar
Tertullian, 1869b. Adversus Marcionem. Vol. 9 of Roberts and Donaldson 1869.Google Scholar
Tertullian, 1869c. De Cultu feminarum. In vol. 11 of Roberts and Donaldson 1869.Google Scholar
Tertullian, 1869d. De Idolatria. In vol. 11 of Roberts and Donaldson 1869.Google Scholar
Tertullian, 1869e. De Spectaculis. In vol. 11 of Roberts and Donaldson 1869.Google Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. 1996. Dissonance and Dissent. Women and the Legal Profession. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William. 1530. An Answer unto Thomas Mores Dialogue. London: N.p. Google Scholar
Vives, Jan-Luis 1526. A Very Fruteful and Pleasant Boke Called the Instruction of Christen Woman. London: Wykes.Google Scholar
Wayne, Valerie. 1985. Some Sad Sentence: Vives' Instruction of a Christian Woman . In Silent But for the Word, ed. Margaret, P. Hannay, pp. 15–29. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Wryley, William. 1592. The True Use of Armorie. London: I. Jackson.Google Scholar