Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:33:52.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retributive Whisper: Communicative Elements in Parole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Netanel Dagan  and
Dana Segev
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aims of retributive or nonutilitarian sentencing are said to conflict with parole as part of a determinate sentencing framework. In this article, we claim that a nonutilitarian approach to punishment does not necessarily conflict with parole. In particular, by adopting core elements of Duff's framework of communicative sentencing, we argue that parole inherently holds a communicative meaning in the form of retributive whisper and can thus be reconciled with a nonutilitarian approach to punishment. In addition, we explore a way to enhance the communicative potential in the parole process and suggest that by recognizing and further incorporating the inherent communicative message in parole we can increase or maximize the board's communicative potential. Finally, we discuss some benefits that can emerge from adapting a communicative sentencing framework to the parole process.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , Summer 2015 , pp. 611 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

American Law Institute. 2011. Model Penal Code: Sentencing, Tentative Draft No. 2 (Approved May 17, 2011). Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Appleman, Laura I. 2007. Retributive Justice and Hidden Sentencing. Ohio State Law Journal 68:1307–1385.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Sarah, and Weaver, Beth. 2013. Persistent Punishment: User Views of Short Prison Sentences. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 52 (3): 285–305.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. 2010. Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagaric, Mirko, and Amarasekara, Kumar. 2001. Feeling Sorry?—Tell Someone Who Cares: The Irrelevance of Remorse in Sentencing. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 40 (4): 364–376.Google Scholar
Ball, David W. 2011. Normative Elements of Parole Risk. Stanford Law & Policy Review 22 (2): 395–412.Google Scholar
Bierschbach, Richard A. 2012. Proportionality and Parole. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 12:1745–1788.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, and Beck, Allen J. 1999. Population Growth in U.S. Prisons, 1980–1996. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 26:17–61.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, and Beck, Allen J. 2005. Reentry as a Transient State Between Liberty and Recommitment. In Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America, ed. Travis, Jeremy and Visher, Christy, 50–79. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Keith A. 1984. Dilemmas of Parole in a Penal Crisis. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 23 (1): 24–40.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Keith A. 1990. Parole in Transition: A Comparative Study of Origins, Developments, and Prospects for the 1990s. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 12:319–374.Google Scholar
Brodeur, Jean‐Paul. 1990. The Attrition of Parole. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 12:503–510.Google Scholar
Burnett, Ros, and Maruna, Shadd. 2006. The Kindness of Prisoners: Strength‐Based Resettlement in Theory and in Action. Criminology and Criminal Justice 6 (1): 83–106.Google Scholar
Caplow, Theodore, and Simon, Jonathan. 1999. Understanding Prison Policy and Population Trends. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 26:63–120.Google Scholar
Crouch, Ben M. 1993. Is Incarceration Really Worse? Analysis of Offenders' Preferences for Prison Over Probation. Justice Quarterly 10:67–88.Google Scholar
Cullen, Francis T., Fisher, Bonnie S., and Applegate, Brandon K. 2000. Public Opinion About Punishment and Corrections. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 27:1–79.Google Scholar
Dancig‐Rosenberg, Hadar, and Tali, Gal. 2012. Restorative Criminal Justice. Cardozo Law Review 13:102–134.Google Scholar
Dancig‐Rosenberg, Hadar, and Pugach, Dana. 2012. Pain, Love, and Voice: The Role of Domestic Violence Victims in Sentencing. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 18:423–484.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony R. 1996. Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 20:1–97.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony R. 2001. Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony R. 2003. Probation, Punishment and Restorative Justice: Should Altruism Be Engaged in Punishment? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 42 (2): 181–197.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony R. 2010. A Criminal Law for Citizens. Theoretical Criminology 14 (3): 293–309.Google Scholar
Duff, Antony R. 2013. Who Must Presume Whom to Be Innocent of What? Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 62 (3): 12–65.Google Scholar
Duff, Anthony R., Farmer, Lindsay, Marshall, Sandra, and Tadros, Victor. 2007. The Trial on Trial: Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. 2003. Restorative Justice, Punishment, and Atonement. Utah Law Review 2003 (1): 303–307.Google Scholar
Grattet, Ryken, Petersilia, Joan, Lin, Jeffery, and Beckman, Marlene. 2009. Parole Violations and Revocations in California: Analysis and Suggestions for Action. Federal Probation 73:2–11 Google Scholar
Griffin, Diarmuid, and O'Donnell, Ian. 2012. The Life Sentence and Parole. British Journal of Criminology 52 (3): 611–629.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1992. Correcting Harms Versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution. UCLA Law Review 29:1659–1702.Google Scholar
Harlow, Robert E., Darley, John M., and Robinson, Paul H. 1995. The Severity of Intermediate Penal Sanctions: A Psychophysical Scaling Approach for Obtaining Community Perceptions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 11 (1): 71–95.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 1983. Assessing Evil: Decision Behavior and Parole Board Justice. British Journal of Criminology 23:101–127.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 2003. Order, Rationality and Silence: Some Reflections on Criminal Justice Decision‐Making. In Exercising Discretion: Decision‐Making in the Penal Process, ed. Padfield, Nicola and Gelsthorpe, Loraine, 186–219. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
Hayes, Hennessey, and Daly, Kathleen 2003. Youth Justice Conferencing and Reoffending. Justice Quarterly 20 (4): 725–764.Google Scholar
Heller, Wendy. 2006. Poverty: The Most Challenging Condition of Prisoner Release. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 13 (2): 219–248.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Andrew. 2010. The Costs of Abusing Probationary Sentences: Over Incarceration and the Erosion of Due Process. Brooklyn Law Review 75 (3): 753–790.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1798] 1965. The Penal Law and the Law of Pardon. In The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, trans. John Law. Indianapolis, IN: Liberal Arts Bobbs Press‐Merrill.Google Scholar
Kirchengast, Tyrone. 2010. Recent Reforms to Victim's Rights and the Emerging Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial. Criminal Law Quarterly 56:82–115.Google Scholar
Kurki, Leena. 2000. Restorative and Community Justice in the United States. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 27:235–303.Google Scholar
Markel, Dan, and Flanders, Chad. 2010. Bentham on Stilts: The Bare Relevance of Subjectivity to Retributive Justice. California Law Review 98:907–988.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd. 2011. Why Do They Hate Us? Making Peace Between Prisoners and Psychology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55 (5): 671–675.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd. 2012. Elements of Successful Desistance Signaling. Criminology & Public Policy 11 (1): 73–86.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd, and LeBel, Thomas P. 2003. “Welcome Home?” Examining the “Reentry Court” Concept from a Strengths‐Based Perspective. Western Criminology Review 4 (2): 91–107.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd, and LeBel, Thomas P. 2010. The Desistance Paradigm in Correctional Practice: From Programmes to Lives. In Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice, ed. McNeill, Fergus, Raynor, Peter, and Trotter, Chris, 65–89. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
Matravers, Matt. 2011. Duff on Hard Treatment. In Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff, ed. Rowan, Cruft, Kramer, Matthew H., and Reiff, Mark R., 68–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, Malcolm, and Burke, Lol. 2012. Thinking Beyond “Utility”: Some Comments on Probation Practice and Training. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 51 (3): 317–330.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval. 1974. The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Hear, Michael M. 2011. Beyond Rehabilitation: A New Theory of Indeterminate Sentencing. American Criminal Law Review 48:1247–1292.Google Scholar
O'Hear, Michael M. 2012. Solving the Good‐Time Puzzle: Why Following the Rules Should Get You Out of Prison Early. Wisconsin Law Review 2012 (1): 195–236.Google Scholar
Ontario Parole Board. 2013. Victim Participation on the Ontario Parole Process. http://www.opb.gov.on.ca/english/victim/victim.html (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
Padfield, Nicola. 2012. Recalling Conditionally Released Prisoners in England and Wales. European Journal of Probation 4 (1): 34–45.Google Scholar
Padfield, Nicola. 2013. Understanding Recall 2011. Cambridge Faculty of Law Legal Studies research paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201039 (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
Padfield, Nicola, and Maruna, Shadd. 2006. The Revolving Door at the Prison Gate: Exploring the Dramatic Increase in Recalls to Prison. Criminology and Criminal Justice 6:329–338.Google Scholar
Payne, Brain, and Gainey, Randy R. 1998. A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 42 (2): 149–163.Google Scholar
Petersilia, Joan R. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petersilia, Joan R., and Deschenes, Elizabeth P. 1994. Perceptions of Punishment: Inmates and Staff Rank the Severity of Prison Versus Intermediate Sanctions. Prison Journal 74 (3): 306–328.Google Scholar
Ranish, Donald R., and Shichor, David. 1985. The Victim's Role in the Penal Process: Recent Developments in California. Federal Probation 49:50–57.Google Scholar
Reitz, Kevin R. 2004. Questioning the Conventional Wisdom of Parole Release Authority. In The Future of Imprisonment, ed. Tonry, Michael, 199–235. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reitz, Kevin R. 2011. The “Traditional” Indeterminate Sentencing Model. In The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections, ed. Petersilia, Joan and Reitz, Kevin R., 270–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V. 2003. Victim Impact Statements and the Sentencing Process: Recent Developments and Research Findings. Criminal Law Quarterly 47:373–396.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V. 2009. Listening to the Crime Victim: Evaluating Victim Input at Sentencing and Parole. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 38 (1): 347–412.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V. 2012. Crime Victims, Sentencing and Release from Prison. In The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections, ed. Petersilia, Joan and Reitz, Kevin R., 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., and Erez, Edna. 2004. Communication in Sentencing: Exploring the Expressive and the Impact Model of Victim Impact Statements. International Review of Victimology 10 (3): 223–244.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., and Erez, Edna. 2010. Communication at Sentencing: Exploring the Expressive Function of Victim Impact Statements. In Hearing the Victim: Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State, ed. Roberts, Julian V. and Bottoms, Anthony E., 232–248. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. 2008. Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should Be Punished How Much? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ronel, Natti, and Claridge, Hadas. 2003. The Powerlessness of Control: A Unifying Model for the Treatment of Male Battering and Substance Addiction. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 3 (1): 57–76.Google Scholar
Russell, Sarah. 2014. Review for Release: Juvenile Offenders, State Parole Practices, and the Eighth Amendment. Indiana Law Journal 89 (1): 373–440.Google Scholar
Sapir, Yoav. 2008. Against Prevention? A Response to Harcourt's Against Prediction on Actuarial and Clinical Predictions and the Faults of Incapacitation. Law & Social Inquiry 33:253–264.Google Scholar
Slobogin, Christopher. 2011. Prevention as the Primary Goal of Sentencing: The Modern Case for Indeterminate Dispositions in Criminal Cases. San Diego Law Review 48:1127–1171.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Bryan A. 2006. Confronting Mass Imprisonment and Restoring Fairness to Collateral Review of Criminal Cases. Harvard Civil Rights‐Civil Liberties Law Review 41:339–367.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham M. 1958. The Society of Captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Szmania, Susan J., and Mangis, Daniel E. 2005. Finding the Right Time and Place: A Case Study Comparison of the Expression of Offender Remorse in Traditional Justice and Restorative Justice Contexts. Marquette Law Review 89 (2): 336–358.Google Scholar
Travis, Jeremy. 2000. But They All Come Back: Rethinking Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181413.pdf (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
Travis, Jeremy, and Christiansen, Kirsten. 2006. Failed Reentry: The Challenges of Back‐End Sentencing. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 13:249–260.Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Justice. 2009. The Future of the Parole Board: A Consultation Paper. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
UK Parole Board Guidance. 2011. Victims and Families Practice Guide. http://www.justice.gov.uk/offenders/parole‐board (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
von Hirsch, Andrew, and Hanrahan, Kathleen J. 1979. The Question of Parole—Retention, Reform or Abolition? Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Ward, Tony. 2010. Is Offender Rehabilitation a Form of Punishment? British Journal of Forensic Practice 12 (4): 4–13.Google Scholar
Weaver, Beth. 2009. Communicative Punishment as a Penal Approach to Supporting Desistance. Theoretical Criminology 13 (9): 9–29.Google Scholar
Weaver, Beth, Tata, Cyrus, Munro, Mary, and Barry, Monica. 2012. The Failure of Recall to Prison: Early Release, Front‐Door and Back‐Door Sentencing and the Revolving Prison Door in Scotland. European Journal of Probation 4 (1): 85–98.Google Scholar
Werth, Robert. 2012. “I Do What I'm Told, Sort Of”: Reformed Subjects, Unruly Citizens, and Parole. Theoretical Criminology 16 (3): 329–346.Google Scholar
Wexler, David B. 2012. New Wine in New Bottles: The Need to Sketch a Therapeutic Jurisprudence “Code” of Proposed Criminal Processes and Practices. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12–16. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2065454 (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
Zaibert, Leo. 2002. Punishment, Liberalism, and Communitarianism. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (1): 673–690.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Dickson v. United Kingdom, 46 EHHR 41, Application no. 44362 (2008).Google Scholar
R. (Brooke) v. Parole Board, EWHC 2036 (Admin.) (2007).Google Scholar
State of Israel v. Genama and others H.C.J 10439/08 (July 20, 2009).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Correctional Services Act 1982, [SA] s. 55 (South Australia).Google Scholar
Corrections and Conditional Release Act, SC 1992, c. 20. (Canada).Google Scholar
Criminal Justice Act, 2003, c. 44 (England).Google Scholar
Criminal Justice (Sentencing) (Licence Conditions) (Northern Ireland) Rules 2009, N, 81.Google Scholar
Parole Law, 2001, S.H. 410 (Israel).Google Scholar
Prison Service Instructions (England), 34/2011.Google Scholar
US Parole Guidelines Manual, 28 CFR 2.2 (2010).Google Scholar