We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Ahel, Richard L.1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press. “Congress as Employer.” 1996 Washington Post, 26 November, A14, final edition.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H.1983. Statutes' Domains. University of Chicago Law Review50:533–52.Google Scholar
Elson, Alex. 1998. The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute. Law and Social Inquiry23(3):625–40.Google Scholar
Elson, Alex, and Shakman, Michael L.1994. The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tainted Process and a Flawed Product. Business Lawyer, 49:1761–92.Google Scholar
Friedson, Eliot. 1983. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Elliot. 1993. CORPRO: A Committee That Became an Institution. Business Lawyer, 48:1333–36.Google Scholar
Green, Justin J., Schmidhauser, John R., Berg, Larry L., and Brady, David. 1973. Lawyers in Congress: A Fresh Look at Some Old Assumptions. Western Political Science Quarterly, 26:440–52.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M.Jr., and Sacks, Albert M.1994. The Legal Process. Edited by William, N. EskridgeJr. and Philip, P. Frickey. Westbury, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hull, N.E.H.1990. Restatement and Reform: A New Perspective on the Origins of the American Law Institute. Law and History Review 855–96.Google Scholar
Kalt, Joseph P., and Zupan, Mark A.1990. The Apparent Ideological Behavior of Legislators: Testing for Principal-Agent Slack in Political Institutions. Journal of Law and Economics33:103–31.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S.1997. Loss and Redemption: Voting Rights at the Turn of the Century. Vanderbilt Law Review, 50:291–323.Google Scholar
Landis, James M.1938. The Administrative Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali S.1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R.1992. Organizational Design and Political Control of Administrative Agencies. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization8:93–110.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R.1993. The Transformation of the American Law Institute. George Washington Law Review61:1212–32.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R.1987. Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3:242–77.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1968. Professions. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences12:536.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.1983. Statutory Interpretation–In the Classroom and in the Courtroom. University of Chicago Law Review50:800–822.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.1993. The Material Basis of Jurisprudence. Indiana Law Journal69:1–37.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.1995. Proceedings of the American Law Institute. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael J.1993. Professional Innovation: Corporate Lawyers and Private Lawmaking. American Bar Foundation Journal1993:423–52.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert E.1989. The Inside Counsel Movement, Professional Judgment and Organizational Representation. Indiana Law Journal64:479–553.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L.1993. Thinking Like a Lawyer, Acting Like a Lobbyist: Some Notes on the Process of Revising UCC Articles 3 and 4. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review26:743–88.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H., and Bailey, Martin J.1994. The Role of Lawyers in Changing the Law. Journal of Legal Studies23:807–31.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Scott, Robert E.1995. The Political Economy of Private Legislatures. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143:595–654.Google Scholar
Senate Rejects Campaign Finance Amendment. 1997. New York Times, 19 March, B9, late edition.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1995. Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Paul A.1992. Government by an Unaccountable Private Non-Profit Corporation. Journal of Human Rights20:67–105.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B.1975. The Reformation of American Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review, 88:1639–1813.Google Scholar
Truman, David B.1971. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
White, J. Michelle1992. Legal Complexity and Lawyers' Benefit from Litigation. International Review of Law and Economics12:381–95.Google Scholar