We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Crespi, Gregory. 1991. The Mid-Life Crisis of the Law and Economics Movement: Confronting the Problems of Nonfalsifiability and Normative Bias. Notre Dame Law Review67:231–52.Google Scholar
Crespi, Gregory. 1997. Does the Chicago School Need to Expand Its CurriculumLaw and Social Inquiry22:149–69.Google Scholar
Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth. 1997. Smoking in the Washroom of the Chicago School: A Reply to Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry22:171–83.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L.1997. The Chicago School and the Development of a Comprehensive Legal Theory: A Reply to Professor Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry22:185–89.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony. 1980. Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle. 9joumal of Legal Studies9:227–42.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism. Virginia Law Review60:451–82.Google Scholar
Malloy, Robin Paul, and Braun, Christopher K., eds. 1995. Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar