Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:44:23.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Prospects for Large-Scale Collaborative Research: Revisiting the Yale White-Collar Crime Research Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Stanton Wheeler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 101 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 David T. Johnson & Richard A. Leo, “The Yale White-Collar Crime Project: A Review and Critique,” 18 Law & Soc. Inquiry 000 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The Bibliography includes all works related to the Yale project, including some published after the formal project came to an end. References in this article are to the publications listed in the Bibliography.Google Scholar

3 The authors might have entitled their review “Four Books from the White Collar Crime Project: A Review and Critique.” This would make them consistent with their own critique of one of our titles.Google Scholar

4 This review was for conference at Indiana on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Sutherland's original paper on the topic. A portion of that review appears in Wheeler 1990.Google Scholar

5 This was more a failure of implementation than of conception. We had one other situation of this type. A book-length work on prosecutors to run parallel to Mann's on defense counsel didn't come to pass, but we have seminal work on prosecution by Katz (1979b, 1980). In any event, I agree with the reviewers that we could have done more in the prosecution area.Google Scholar

6 On this and other topics, we would have welcomed doing more to establish cross-national comparison, but that seemed beyond our scope. For one exception, see Montius & Rose-Ackerman (1981).Google Scholar

7 I'm thinking primarily here of government-supported research, and specifically NIJ, which funded our project. Some private programs like the MacArthur Foundation and Russell Sage Foundation may offer more freedom to the researchers.Google Scholar