We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Berle, A. A.Jr.1933. The Legal Profession and Legal Education. Vol. 9 of Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 340–45.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C.Jr.1992. Due Process for Kaye, Scholer Legal Times, 16 March, 22.Google Scholar
Koniak, Susan, and Cohen, George M.1996. Under Cloak of Settlement. Virginia Law Review82:1051–1280.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P.1993. Kaye, Scholer, FIRREA, and the Desirability of Early Closure: A View of the Kaye, Scholer Case from the Perspective of Bank Regulatory Policy. Southern California Law Review66:1115–1143.Google Scholar
Painter, Richard W.1998. Letter to William H. Simon, 4 January. Copy on file with author.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Jesus, and Nauss, Donald W.1995. Court Rejects GM Settlement on Value of Pickup Trucks. L. A. Times, 18 April, D6.Google Scholar
Simon, William. 1998. The Kaye Scholer Affair: The Lawyer's Duty of Candor and the Bar's Temptations of Evasion and Apology. Law and Social Inquiry23:243–95.Google Scholar
Southern California Law Review. 1993. Introduction: Kaye, Scholer and the OTS: Did Anyone Go Too FarSouthern California Law Review66:977–984.Google Scholar
Torry, Saundra, and Brown, Warren. 1995. GM Truck Settlement Overturned on Appeal. Washington Post, 18 April, D1.Google Scholar