Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T20:26:55.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Professional Liquidation in the Context of Autocratic Legalism: Lawyers, Class, and Status in Turkey, 2002–?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2025

Z. Umut Türem*
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Austria

Abstract

The relationship between law and autocratization is usually discussed with reference to the judiciary and how a powerful executive can encroach on the domain of the judicial branch. In this article, I suggest that the legal profession also needs to be brought into the discussion on autocratic legalism. Taking Turkey as my case, I put forward two main arguments: first, that, in national contexts where the legal profession is perceived to be originally and organically tied to the state—the “ancien regime” that aspiring autocrats try to dismantle—autocratic legalism involves efforts to overtake not only the judiciary but also such legal professional institutions as bar associations and their umbrella organizations and, second, that legal autocratization is made possible not only through such conscious/targeted attacks but also through processes and policies that are intended for other goals. In Turkey, the neoliberalization of legal education through a populist discourse and the consequent massive increase in the lawyer population has created heterogeneity and multiple fault lines within the profession. Such dynamics have created not only apathy, particularly on the part of young(er) lawyers, but also a weakening of the profession as a whole, preparing the groundwork for the more intentional attacks of the autocratic government. The result, I argue, is “professional liquidation.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Richard L., Sommerlad, Hillary, Hammerslev, Ole, and Schultz, Ulrike, eds. 2020. Lawyers in 21st Century Societies. Vol. 1: National Reports. Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——. 2022. Lawyers in 21st Century Societies. Vol. 2: Comparisons and Theories. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar
Acevedo, Deepa Das. 2022. “Autocratic Legalism in India: A Roundtable.” Jindal Global Law Review 13, no. 1: 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbaş, Kasım. 2015. Avukatlık Mesleğinin Ekonomi Politiği: Avukatların Sınıfsal Konumlarındaki Değişim. Istanbul: Notabene Yayınları.Google Scholar
Akçay, Ümit. 2018. “Neoliberal Populism in Turkey and Its Crisis.” Institute for International Political Economy Berlin Working Paper no. 100/2018.Google Scholar
Alan, Serkan. 2018. “Ankara Barosu’nun Yeni Başkanı Erinç Sağkan.” Gazete Duvar, October 21.Google Scholar
Aman, Alfred. 2004. The Democracy Deficit: Taming Globalization through Law Reform. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. 2007. “Constitutional Development and Political Reconstruction from Nation Building to New Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism and Political Reconstruction, edited by Arjomand, S. A., 343. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artıgerçek . 2023. “MİT’den ‘Yargıdaki Çürüme’ Raporu: ‘Savcı ve Hakimlerin Parasal İlişkileri Konusunda Tespitler Yapıldı.” October 31. https://artigercek.com/guncel/mitden-yargidaki-curume-raporu-savci-ve-hakimlerin-parasal-iliskileri-konusunda-tespitler-yapildi-271090h#google_vignette.Google Scholar
Avukat Hakları Grubu . 2022. “Sayılarla İstanbul Barosu,” May 16. https://www.avukathaklari.net/sayilarla-istanbul-barosu/.Google Scholar
Barobirlik . 2016a. “‘KHK’ler Türkiye’sinde Savunma Hakkı Paneli’” Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nde Gerçekleştirildi.” November 12. https://www.barobirlik.org.tr/Haberler/khkler-turkiyesinde-savunma-hakki-paneli-turkiye-barolar-birliginde-gerceklestirildi-72947.Google Scholar
Barobirlik . 2016b. “KHK’lar Türkiye’sinde Savunma Hakkı Paneli Sonuç Bildirgesi.” November 12. http://d.barobirlik.org.tr/2016/20161112_khkbildiri.pdf.Google Scholar
Barobirlik . 2024. “31.12.2023 İtibariyle Baroların Avukat Sayıları.” January 11. https://www.barobirlik.org.tr/Haberler/2023-avukat-sayilari-31122023-84464.Google Scholar
Barobirlik . 2025. “Avukat Sayıları.” Accessed April 9, 2025. https://www.barobirlik.org.tr/Barolar.Google Scholar
BBC News Türkçe . 2000. “Erdoğan Feyzioğlu’na Kızıp Salonu Terketti.” June 10. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2014/05/140510_erdogan.Google Scholar
Belge, Ceren. 2006. “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey.” Law & Society Review 40, no. 3: 653–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding?Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1: 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianet . 2002. “Barolar Yeni Başkanlarını Seçti.” October 21. https://bianet.org/haber/barolar-yeni-baskanlarini-secti-14039.Google Scholar
Bianet . 2008. “Barolar Başkanlarını Seçti: İstanbul Aydın’ın, Ankara Coşar’ın, Antalya Köken’in.” October 27. https://bianet.org/haber/barolar-baskanlarini-secti-istanbul-aydin-in-ankara-cosar-in-antalya-koken-in-110465.Google Scholar
Bianet . 2012. “İstanbul ve Ankara Baro Başkanları Değişmedi.” October 14. https://bianet.org/haber/istanbul-ve-ankara-baro-baskanlari-degismedi-141456.Google Scholar
Birgün Daily . 2014. “Dün TÜSİAD’a, Bugün Cemaate: Bitaraf olan Bertaraf Olur.” December 15. https://www.birgun.net/haber/dun-tusiad-a-bugun-cemaate-bitaraf-olan-bertaraf-olur-72602.Google Scholar
Bloomberght . 2014. “Hakim ve Savcıların Maaşlarına 1150 TL Zam Geliyor.” September 9. https://www.bloomberght.com/haberler/haber/1622719-hakim-ve-savcilarin-maaslarina-1150-tl-zam-geliyor.Google Scholar
Boese, Vanessa A., Edgell, Amanda B., Hellmeier, Sebastian, Maerz, Seraphine F., and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2021. “How Democracies Prevail: Democratic Resilience as a Two Stage Process.” Democratization 28, no. 5: 885907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonelli, Maria de Gloria, and Fortes, Pedro. 2020. “Brazil: Fragmentary Development, Democratisation, and Globalisation.” In Abel et al. 2020, 391409.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2019. In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruff, Ian. 2014. “The Rise of Authoritarian Liberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26, no. 1: 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruff, Ian, and Burak Tansel, Cemal, eds. 2020. Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Philosophies, Practices, Contestations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cırhınlıoğlu, Zafer. 1995. “The Changing Structure of the Legal Profession in Turkey: An Historical and Sociological Analysis.” PhD diss., University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Cook, Steven. 2018. “Referendums and the Institutionalization of Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 24, no. 1: 7180.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2015. “The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 2: 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe . 2024. “Statistics from CCBE.” Accessed April 9, 2025. https://www.ccbe.eu/actions/statistics/.Google Scholar
Cumhuriyet . 2020. “78 Barodan Tarihi Çağrı: Barolar Yıkıldığında Herkes Kimsesiz Kalacak.” June 29. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/78-barodan-tarihi-cagri-barolar-yikildiginda-herkes-kimsesiz-kalacak-1748270.Google Scholar
Cumhuriyet . 2021. “Ankara Barosu Seçimleri Sonuçlandı: Erinç Sağkan Yeniden Başkan Seçildi.” September 19. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/turkiye/ankara-barosu-secimleri-sonuclandi-erinc-sagkan-yeniden-baskan-secildi-1870198.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott. 2024. “Lawyers in Backsliding Democracy.” California Law Review 112: 101–89.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, Koray. 2018. “Toward a New Political Regime in Turkey: From Competitive toward Full Authoritarianism.” New Perspectives on Turkey 58, no. 2: 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çepni, Ozan. 2016. “Ankara Barosu’nda Yeniden Demokratik Sol Dönem.” Cumhuriyet, October 10.Google Scholar
De Sa e Silva, Fabio. 2022. “Law and Illiberalism: A Sociological Review and Research Roadmap.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18: 193209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sa e Silva, Fabio. 2023. “Good Bye Liberal-Legal Democracy.” Law & Social Inquiry 48, no. 1: 292313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirtaş, Erdem. 2022. “Constitutional Courts during Political Upheavals: The Case of the Turkish Constitutional Court.” PhD diss., Boğaziçi University.Google Scholar
Deutsche Welle Türkçe . 2019. “Erdoğan’dan Töreni Boykot Eden Barolara Tepki.” September 2. https://www.dw.com/tr/erdoğandan-beştepedeki-töreni-boykot-eden-barolara-tepki/a-50256690.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2022. “Law as Reproduction and Revolution: An Interconnected History of the Internationalisation of National Legal Hierarchies.” In Abel et al. 2022, 569–89.Google Scholar
Elveriş, İdil. 2014. “Cause Lawyering When It Really Matters: How Istanbul Lawyers Reacted to Events in Gezi.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 23, no. 2: 131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erozan, Boğaç Hüseyin. 2005. “Producing Obedience: Law Professors and the Turkish State.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Gadowska, Kaja. 2020. “Poland: Opening the Legal Profession.” In Abel et al. 2020, 309–30.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz Z.. 2018. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Manuel A. 2022. “Evolution of Latin American Lawyers over Three Decades: 1990–2020.” In Abel et al. 2022, 3150.Google Scholar
Gomez, Manuel, and Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio. 2020. “Venezuela: A Despatch from the Abyss.” In Abel et al. 2020, 449–69.Google Scholar
Grabowska-Moroz, Barbara, and Sniadach, Olga. 2021. “The Role of Civil Society in Protecting Judicial Independence in Times or Rule of Law Backsliding in Poland.” Utrecht Law Review 17, no. 2: 5669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien, eds. 1998. Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hukuk Ansiklopedisi . 2024. “Avukatlar Sendikası.” November 26. https://hukukbook.com/avukatlar-sendikasi/.Google Scholar
HukukiHaber . 2012. “İstanbul Barosu 2012 Seçim Sonuçları.” October 14. https://www.hukukihaber.net/istanbul-barosu-2012-secim-sonuclari.Google Scholar
İstanbul Barosu . 2010. “İstanbul Barosu’nda Ümit Kocasakal Dönemi.” November 7. https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=5310.Google Scholar
İstanbul Barosu . 2022. “Av. Filiz Saraç İstanbul Barosu’nun Yeni Başkanı Seçildi.” October 10. https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=17313&Desc=Av.-Filiz-Saraç-İstanbul-Barosu’nun-Yeni-Başkanı-Seçildi.Google Scholar
Kalem, Seda. 2020. “Turkey: Emergence and Development of the Legal Profession.” In Abel et al. 2020, 675–93.Google Scholar
Kalem, Seda, and Elveriş, İdil. 2018. “Siyaset Yapmak ya da Yapmamak: 2018 İstanbul Barosu Seçimlerine Bir Bakış.” Ankara Barosu Dergisi 2018, no. 4: 165208.Google Scholar
Kiersey, Nicholas. 2021. “Governmentality, Authoritarianism, or Capitalist Realism? Explaining Austerity with Foucauldian Political Economy.” In The Globality of Governmentality: Governing an Entangled World, edited by Busse, Jan, 123–43. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisilowski, Maciej. 2015. “The Middlemen: The Legal Profession, the Rule of Law and the Authoritarian Regimes.” Law & Social Inquiry 40, no. 3: 700–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koğacıoğlu, Dicle. 2004. “Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey.” Law & Society Review 38, no. 3: 433–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koytak, Muhammed Elyesa. 2022. “Mesleğin Dönüşümü: Hekimler ve Avukatlar.” PhD diss., Istanbul Medeniyet University.Google Scholar
Köse, Mehmet. 2014. “The Evolution of the Separation of Powers in the Turkish Republic: The Case of the 2010 Constitutional Referendum.” MA thesis, Boğaziçi University.Google Scholar
Laebens, Melis G., and Lührmann, Anna. 2021. “What Halts Democratic Erosion? The Changing Role of Accountability.” Democratization 28, no. 5: 908–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medyascope . 2021. “Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yeni Başkanını Seçecek: Erinç Sağkan ve Metin Feyzioğlu Başkanlığa Aday.” December 4. https://medyascope.tv/2021/12/04/turkiye-barolar-birligi-yeni-baskanini-sececek-erinc-sagkan-ve-metin-feyzioglu-baskanliga-aday/.Google Scholar
Memurlar.net . 2004. “Ankara Baro Seçimlerini Yine Sol Aday Kazandı.” October 19. https://www.memurlar.net/haber/10994/ankara-baro-secimlerini-yine-sol-aday-kazandi.html.Google Scholar
Memurlar.net . 2010. “Baro Seçimlerinde Kim Oyunu Ne Kadar Artırdı?/ Video.” October 15. https://www.memurlar.net/haber/295776/baro-secimlerinde-kim-oyunu-ne-kadar-arttirdi-video.html.Google Scholar
Microdestek . 2014. “Üç Büyük İlde 2014 Baro Seçimi Sonuçları.” October 21. https://microdestek.com.tr/2014-baro-secim-sonuclari.html Google Scholar
Microdestek . 2016. “İstanbul 2016 Baro Seçim Sonuçları.” October 26. https://microdestek.com.tr/2016-baro-secim-sonuclari.html.Google Scholar
Microdestek . 2022. “Ankara Barosu Başkanını Seçti.” October 13. https://microdestek.com.tr/ankara-barosu-baskanini-secti.html.Google Scholar
Ocaklı, Feryaz. 2022. “Regime Change under the Party of Justice and Development (AKP) in Turkey.” In The Oxford Handbook of Politics in Muslim Societies, edited by Cammett, Melanie and Jones, Pauline, 143–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, David. 2022. “A Global Crisis of Liberal Democracy?: On Autocratic Democracy, Populism and Post-Truth Politics.” Journal of Social and Political Philosophy 1, no. 1: 3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özman, Aylin. 2007. “Law, Ideology and Modernization in Turkey: Kemalist Legal Reforms in Perspective.” Social and Legal Studies 19, no. 1: 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Frank. 2022. “State Centered Comparisons of Legal Professions in an Era of Globalization.” In Abel et al. 2022, 543–68.Google Scholar
Parslow, Joakim. 2015. “Lawyers on the Barricades: The Politics of Exceptional Law in Turkey, 1930–1980.” PhD diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
Pehlivan, Barış, and Terkoğlu, Barış. 2020. Metastaz 2: Cendere. Istanbul: Kırmızı Kedi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Perez-Hurtado, Luis Fernando. 2020. “Mexico: Significant Growth and Under-Regulation of the Legal Profession.” In Abel et al. 2020, 429–47.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton Google Scholar
Saatçi, Serhat. 2021. “Meslek Örgütlenmelerinden Kamu Kurumu Niteliğindeki Meslek Kuruluşlarına.” Kamu Yönetimi ve Politikaları Dergisi 2, no. 2: 213–32.Google Scholar
Schepelle, Kim Lane. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” University of Chicago Law Review 85, no. 1: 545–84.Google Scholar
Sendika.org . 2004. “İstanbul Barosu Seçimleri Sonuçlandı.” October 25. https://sendika.org/2004/10/istanbul-barosu-secimleri-sonuclandi-1952.Google Scholar
Sendika.org . 2006. “Baro Seçimleri Yapıldı.” October 16. https://sendika.org/2006/10/baro-secimleri-yapildi-9592.Google Scholar
Serbestiyet . 2020. “Baro Yürüyüşlerine Muhfazakar- Milliyetçi Eğilimli Avukatlar da Katılıyor.” June 20. https://serbestiyet.com/haberler/gundem/baro-yuruyuslerine-muhafazakar-milliyetci-egilimli-avukatlar-da-katiliyor-35922/.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, Simon. 2012. “Neoliberalism as Discourse: Between Foucauldian Political Economy and Marxist Poststructuralism.” Critical Discourse Studies 9, no. 2: 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2017. “The Return of the Repressed.” New Left Review 104 (March–April): 518.Google Scholar
Tahiroğlu, Merve. 2020. “How Turkey’s Leaders Dismantled the Rule of Law.” Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 44, no. 1: 6796.Google Scholar
Tekerek, Tuğba. 2023. Taşra Üniversiteleri: AKP’nin Arka Kampüsü. İstanbul: İletişimYayınları.Google Scholar
Tomini, Luca, Gibril, Suzan, and Bochev, Venelin. 2023. “Standing up against Autocratization across Political Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Resistance Actors and Strategies.” Democratization 30, no. 1: 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasa Mahkemesi . 2023. “Karar: Avukatlar Sendikası Başvurusu –Başvuru no. 2018/27450).” May 17, 2023. https://kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr/BB/2018/27450.Google Scholar
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu . 2024. “Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2023.” February 6. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2023-49684.Google Scholar
Van Lit, Joep, van Ham, Carolien, and Meijers, Maurits J.. 2023. “Countering Autocratization: A Roadmap for Democratic Defence.” Democratization 31, no. 4: 765–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varol, Ozan. 2018. “Stealth Authoritarianism.” Iowa Law Review 100: 16731742.Google Scholar
Verikaynağı 2020. “Bir Hakime Düşen Dava Sayısı.” September 24. https://www.verikaynagi.com/grafik/bir-hakime-dusen-dava-sayisi/.Google Scholar
Verikaynağı . 2021. “Türkiye’de Mahkemelerdeki Dava Sayıları.” September 29. https://www.verikaynagi.com/genel/turkiyede-mahkemelerdeki-dava-sayilari/.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1999. “Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31, no. 4: 379401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia . 2025. “Türkiye’de Genel Nüfus Sayımı.” April 5. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Türkiye%27de_genel_nüfus_sayımı.Google Scholar
Yaşar, Ferhat. 2021. “İstanbul Barosu’nda Seçim: Durakoğlu Yeniden Başkan.” Gazete Duvar, October 17.Google Scholar
Yüce, Müzeyyen. 2022. “Avukat Sayıları Artışta: Bir Yılda 17 bin 321 Yeni Avukat.” Gazete Duvar, January 20.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi . 2024. Accessed April 9, 2025. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Kurulu . 2024. “Hukuk Programı Bulunan Tüm Üniversiteler.” Accessed April 9, 2025. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10094.Google Scholar