Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:23:48.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power in Paradise: The Political Implications of Santos's Utopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.

—Thomas Paine, Common Sense

Common sense creates the folklore of the future, a relatively rigidified phase of popular knowledge in a given time and place.

Antonio Gramsci, Selections

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Aronowitz, S. 1988. Science as Power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. [1622] 1938. New Atlantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barret-Kriegel, B. 1995. The State and the Rule of Law Translated by Marc, A. Le Pain, and Jeffrey, C. Cohen. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. 1989. America. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H., ed. 1990. Nation and Narration. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bosniak, L. S. 1996. Opposing Prop. 187: Undocumented Immigrants and the National Imagination. Connecticut Law Review 28:555620.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. 1995. Border Crossings: NAFTA, Regulatory Restructuring, and the Politics of Place. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2:371–93.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. 1996. Re-Viewing Local Hero: Problems of Perspective and Scale in Research on Globalization. Paper presented at the Law and Society Annual Meeting, July, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Calavita, K., and Seron, C. 1992. Postmodernism and Protest: Recovering the Sociological Imagination. Law & Society Review 26:765–72.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1996. The Claims of Common Sense: More, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, J. G. 1992. Occidentalism: The World Turned Upside-Down. American Ethnologist 19(2):195212.Google Scholar
Chambers, I. 1994. Migrancy Culture Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, J., Maurer, B., and Suarez Navaz, L. 1995. Sanctioned Identities: Legal Constructions of Modem Personhood. Identities 2(1–2):128.Google Scholar
Comte, G. 1975 [1851]. Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. Edited by Lenzer, G. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Coombe, R. 1995. Finding and Losing One's Self in the Topoi: Placing and Displacing the Postmodern Subject in Law. Law & Society Review 29:599609.Google Scholar
Cronon, W., ed. 1995. Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. Boston: Norton.Google Scholar
Danielsen, D., and Engle, K., eds. 1995. After Identity: A Reader in Law and Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, E. 1995a. Rabies Rides the Fast Train: Transnational Interactions in Post-Colonial Times. Law and Critique 6(1):7594.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, E. 1995b. Legal Imagery in the “Garden of England. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2(2):395411.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, E. 1995c. Law in Place: Legal Mediations of National Identity and State Territory in Europe. In Nationalism, Racism, and the Rule of Law, edited by Fitzpatrick, Peter. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, E. 1996. Introduction. In Special Issue on Law and Postcolonialism, edited by Darian-Smith, E. and Fitzpatrick, P. Social and Legal Studies 5(3):291300.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Deflem, M. 1994. Introduction. In Special Issue on Habermas and Law, edited by Deflem, M. Philosophy and Social Criticism 20(4):120.Google Scholar
Doty, R. L. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representations in North-South Relations Vol. 5, Borderlines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fardon, R. 1990. Localizing Strategies: The Regionalization of Ethnographic Accounts. In Localizing Strategies: Regional Traditions of Ethnographic Writing, edited by Fardon, R. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press; Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. 1992. The Mythology of Modern Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. 1995. Passions Out of Place: Law, Incommensurability, and Resistance. Law and Critique 6(1):95112.Google Scholar
Flores, W. V. 1990. Chicano Empowerment and the Politics of At-large Elections in California: A Tale of Two Cities. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Center for Chicano Studies.Google Scholar
Ford, R. T. 1994. The Boundaries of Race: Political Geography in Legal Analysis. Harvard Law Review. 107:18411921.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16(1):2227.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. 1995. Science as Culture, Cultures of Science. Annual Review of Anthropology 24:163–84.Google Scholar
French, R. R. 1996. Of Narrative in Law and Anthropology. Law & Society Review 30:417–36.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., and Bodin, D., eds. 1994. Now Here: Space, Time, and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Common Sense as a Cultural System. In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gomez-Quinones, J. 1994. Roots of Chicano Politics, 1600–1990. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1996. The East in the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1984. Selections from the Cultural Writings. Edited by Forgacs, D. and Nowell-Smith, G. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A., and Hart, K. 1995. The Rise and Fall of Scientific Ethnography. In The Future of Anthropology: Its Relevance to the Contemporary World, edited by Akbar, S. Ahmed and Cris, N. Shore. London: Althone.Google Scholar
Gutiérez-Jones, C. 1995. Rethinking the Borderlands: Between Chicano Culture and Legal Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Handler, J. F. 1992. Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements. Law & Society Review 26:697732.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1993. Introduction: Eurocentric Scientific Illiteracy–A Challenge for the World Community. In The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future, edited by Harding, S. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hermer, J., and Hunt, A. 1996. Official Graffiti of the Everyday. Law & Society Review 30:455–80.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. 1992. Changing Boundaries in the Americas: New Perspectives on the US, Mexican, Central American, and South American Borders. La Jolla, Calif.: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UCSD, Collection Tloque Nahuague.Google Scholar
Holthoon, F. van, and Olson, D. R. 1987. Common Sense: The Foundations for Social Science. Lantham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hopenhayn, M. 1995. Postmodernism and Neoliberalism in Latin America. In The Postmodern Debate in Latin America, edited by Beverley, J., Oviedo, J., and Aronna, M. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, P. K. 1994. The Death of Common Sense: How Law Is Suffocating America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hundert, E. J. 1987. Enlightenment and the Decay of Common Sense. In Holthoon and Olson 1987.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landy, M. 1994. Film, Politics, and Gramsci. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Logan, G. M. 1983. The Meaning of More's “Utopia.” Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, O. J. 1994. Border People: Life and Society in the US-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
McCann, M. W. 1992. Resistance, Reconstruction, and Romance in Legal Scholarship. Law & Society Review 26:733–49.Google Scholar
Milward, A. S. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, S. Falk. 1973. Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law & Society Review 7:719–46.Google Scholar
Moore, T. [1516] 1908. Utopia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, L., ed. 1996. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paine, T. [1776] 1953. Common Sense and Other Political Writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Peña, D. G. 1995. The Terror of the Machine: Technology, Work, Gender, and Ecology on the US-Mexico Border. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, C. 1995. Approaching Anxiety: The Insistence of the Postcolonial in the Declaration of Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Law and Critique 6(055–74.Google Scholar
Perry, R. W. 1997. Book Review of Toward a New Common Sense. Contemporary Sociology. 26(2):213–15.Google Scholar
Pue, W. W. 1990. Wrestling with Law: (Geographical) Specificity vs. (Legal) Abstraction. Urban Geography 11(6):566–85.Google Scholar
Pugh, S. 1988. Garden-Nature-Language. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1960. World and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riles, A. 1995. The View from the International Plane: Perspective and Scale in the Architecture of Colonial International Law. Law and Critique 6(1):3954.Google Scholar
Rottleuthner, H. 1989. The Limits of Law: The Myth of a Regulatory Crisis. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 17:273–85.Google Scholar
Sahlins, P. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 1987. Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society 14:279302.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1994. Ethnicity and Space in the Global City: A New Frontier. In Managing Divided Cities, edited by Dunn, S. London: Rybum Publishing and Keele University Press.Google Scholar
Sciulli, D. 1996. Book Review of Toward a New Common Sense. American Journal of Sociology 102(3):861–63.Google Scholar
Serres, M., and Latour, B. 1995. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G. C. Moore, ed. 1938. Introduction to Francis Bacon's New Atlantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, A. 1996. Lingua Franca 6(4):6264.Google Scholar
Stanley, C. 1995. Law of Space, Space of Law (Part 1: Orientation via Goodrich and contra Harvey). International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23:121.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1995. The Nice Thing about Culture Is that Everyone Has It. In Shifting Contexts. Transformations in Anthropological Discourse, edited by Strathern, M. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stobbart, L. 1992. Utopia–Fact of Fiction? Evidence from the Americas. Phoenix Mill, Gloucestershire: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. 1987. Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In Juridification of Social Spheres, edited by Teubner, G. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tricker, R. I. 1990. Corporate Governance: A Ripple on the Cultural Reflections. Capitalism in Contrasting Cultures, edited by Clegg, S. R. and Redding, S. G. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yang, Mayfair. 1994. Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zadek, S. 1993. An Economics of Utopia: Democratizing Scarcity. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar