Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:38:28.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Positivist Account of the Rule of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Frank Lovett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite extensive debate, accounts of the Rule of Law remain strikingly vague and imprecise. This paper begins the task of remedying this situation through the development of an analytically rigorous theory of the Rule of Law. First, it offers a preliminary sketch of a concept of law; second, it shows how the principles traditionally associated with the Rule of Law can be intrinsically connected with this concept of law; and third, it shows how these principles place meaningful restrictions on what states can and cannot do. Further components of the overall project are gestured toward in the paper's conclusion. Apart from advancing the broader goal of developing a complete theory of the Rule of Law, a paper of even this limited scope will be helpful in imposing some much-needed conceptual discipline over the Rule of Law debate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 41 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, Andrew. 1990. Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall L. 1995. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In Explaining Social Institutions, ed. Knight, Jack and Sened, Itai. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L., and Leiter, Brian. 1996. Legal Positivism. In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Patterson, Dennis. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. [1915] 1982. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Reprint, Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989a. The Cement of Society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989b. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. 1997. The Rule of Law as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse. Columbia Law Review 97: 1–56.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew, and Tirole., Jean 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. Rev. ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1994. Democracy and the Rule of Law. In The Rule of Law: Nomos 36, ed. Shapiro., Ian New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2d ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark. 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1989. Pure Theory of Law Trans. Knight, Max. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967. Reprint, Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith (page references are to reprint edition).Google Scholar
Neumann, Frantz L. [1937] 1996. The Change in the Function of Law in Modern Society. In The Rule of Law Under Siege: Selected Essays of Frantz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, ed. Scheuerman, William E. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R., North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R. 1990. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics 2: 1–23.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. 2000. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 1982. Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 165–203.Google Scholar
Radin, Jane. 1989. Reconsidering the Rule of Law. Boston University Law Review 69: 781–819.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1999. Practical Reason and Norms. 2d ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. 1989. Law and Legislation in the Administrative State. Columbia Law Review 89: 369–426.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, Bill. 1994. The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: Toward a New Synthesis. Politics and Society 22: 195–213.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1998. Political Theory and the Rule of Law. In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Hoffman, Stanley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. London, U. K.: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1990. The Law. London, U. K.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1919] 1946. Politics as a Vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. Democracy as a Self-Enforcing Equilibrium. In Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, ed. Breton, Albert, et al. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar