Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:27:25.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Porous Bureaucracy: Legitimating the Administrative State in Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Anya Bernstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars and politicians have sometimes presented bureaucracy as inherently conflicting with democracy. But bureaucrats themselves are rarely consulted about that relationship. In contrast, I draw on interviews and participant observation to illuminate how government administrators understand their own place in the government of Taiwan, one of the few successful third wave democracies. The administrators I work with root their own legitimacy not in separated powers or autonomous expertise, but in their ongoing collaboration with legislators and publics. They define their own accountability not just as executing legislative mandates but as producing them in the first place, and they figure bureaucracy as a key site for political participation. I put these views into historical context to elucidate how bureaucracy can compete for democratic bona fides with common democratic indicators like constitutions and elections. This article contributes to scholarship on the ethnography of bureaucracy, administrative accountability networks, and the internal law of administration. In particular, I stress the importance of administrative culture as a central aspect of political legitimation.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 28 - 51
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce. “The New Separation of Powers.” Harvard Law Review 113, no. 3 (2000): 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. “The Social Life of Cultural Value.” Language and Communication 23, no. 3–4 (2003): 231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, Alice H. “The State and Taiwan’s Economic Development.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter, B. Evans, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 78–106. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimow, Michael, Bocksang Hola, Gabriel, Cirotteau, Marie, Dotan, Yoav, and Perroud, Thomas. “Between the Agency and the Court: Ex Ante Review of Regulations.” American Journal of Comparative Law (2019) (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Jeeyang Rhee. “Breaking Authoritarian Bonds: The Political Origins of the Taiwan Administrative Procedure Act.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5, no. 3 (2005): 365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Jeeyang Rhee. Responsive Democracy: Increasing State Accountability in East Asia. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Anya. “The Social Life of Regulation in Taipei City Hall: The Role of Legality in the Administrative Bureaucracy.” Law & Social Inquiry 33 (2008): 925–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Anya. “Bureaucratic Speech: Language Choice and Democratic Identity in the Taipei Bureaucracy.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 40 (2017): 28–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Anya. “The Songs of Other Birds.” In Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law: Revisiting the Oven Bird’s Song, edited by Trautner, Mary Nell, 219–36. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignami, Francesca. “From Expert Administration to Accountability Network: A New Paradigm for Comparative Administrative Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (2011): 859–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignami, Francesca, and Zaring, David, eds. Comparative Law and Regulation: Understanding the Global Regulatory Process. New York: Edward Elgar, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishai, Martha Fitzpatrick. “The Development of Industrial Land in Taiwan: A Legal Framework for State Control.” Journal of Developing Areas 26 (1991): 53–64.Google Scholar
Bosco, Joseph. “Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, and the State in Local Politics.” Ethnology 31, no. 2 (1992): 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughey, Janina. “Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (2013): 55–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992. Translated by Fernbach, David. Cambridge, UK: Press, Polity, 2014.Google Scholar
Cabot, Heath. On the Doorstep of Europe: Asylum and Citizenship in Greece. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. “An Empirical Study of Administrative Appeal in Taiwan: A Cautionary Tale.” Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 23 (2014): 263–304.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. “The Evolution of Property Law in Taiwan: An Unconventional Interest Group Story.” In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Law and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shen, Wei, and Wang, Wen Yeu. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Chin, Ko-lin. Heijin: Organized Crime, Business, and Politics in Taiwan. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2003.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Diamond, Larry, Nathan, Andrew J., and Shin, Doh Chull, eds. How East Asians View Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Chuang, Ya-Chung. “Democracy in Action: The Making of Social Movement Webs in Taiwan.” Critique of Anthropology 24, no. 3 (2004): 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Allen. “From Nationalism to Nationalizing: Cultural Imagination and State Formation in Post-War Taiwan.” In Chinese Nationalism, edited by Unger, Jonathan, 49–69. Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996.Google Scholar
Chun, Allen. “Democracy as Hegemony, Globalization as Indigenization, or the ‘Culture’ in Taiwanese National Politics.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 35, no. 1 (2000): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Brigham. “Agency as Principal.” Georgia Law Review 48 (2014): 335–423.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. In John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, Vol. 2. Carbondale, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. “The Ideological Foundations of the New Life Movement: A Study in Counterrevolution.” Journal of Asian Studies 34, no. 4 (1975): 947–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. Democracy Index 2018: Free Speech under Attack. 2018. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Democracy2018.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. “The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community.” Law and Society Review 18, no. 4 (1984): 551–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. “Globalization and the Decline of Legal Consciousness: Torts, Ghosts, and Karma in Thailand.” Law & Social Inquiry 30, no. 3 (2005): 469–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppinger, Monica. “Sages, Savages, and Other Speech Act Communities: Culture in Comparative Law.” St. Louis University Law Journal 57 (2013): 407–28.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1900-1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson. “Bureaucratizing Democracy, Democratizing Bureaucracy.” Law & Social Inquiry 25, no. 4 (2000): 1077–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, Didier, et al. At the Heart of the State: The Moral World of Institutions. Translated by Brown, Patrick and Fassin, Didier. London: Pluto Press, [2013] 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, Xiaotong. From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Translated by Hamilton, Gary and Zheng, Wang. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Fingarette, Herbert. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, [1972] 1998.Google Scholar
Freedom House. Interactive Map. 2018. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2018.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. “Language Ideologies Compared: Metaphors of Public/Private.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (2005): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Hill. “Ethnicity and Social Class.” In The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, edited by Ahern, Emily and Gates, Hill, 241–81. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “‘From the Native’s Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28, no. 1 (1974): 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “Dismantling the Developmental State? Administrative Procedure Reform in Japan and Korea.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 585–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “Comparative Administrative Procedure: Evidence from Northeast Asia.” Constitutional Political Economy 13 (2002a): 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan.” Law & Social Inquiry 27, no. 4 (2002b): 763–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Thomas B. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1986.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. “Networks and Their Nodes: Urban Society on Taiwan.” The China Quarterly 99 (1984): 529–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. New York: Berg, 1992.Google Scholar
Hoag, Colin. “The Magic of the Populace: An Ethnography of Illegibility in the South African Immigration Bureaucracy.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 33, no. 1 (2010): 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoag, Colin, and Hull, Matthew. “A Review of the Anthropological Literature on the Civil Service.” World Bank Group Development Research Group Impact Evaluation Team Policy Working Research Paper 8081, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Yi. “Enacting the ‘Incomprehensible China’: Modern European Jurisprudence and the Japanese Reconstruction of Qing Political Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 33, no. 4 (2008): 955–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Yi. “Unpopular Sovereignty: Constitutional Identity through the Lens of the Umbrella and Sunflower Movements.” In Law and Politics of the Taiwan Sunflower and Hong Kong Umbrella Movements, edited by Brian Christophe Jones, 117–26. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Yi, and Law, David S.. “Proportionality Review of Administrative Action in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and China.” In Comparative Law and Regulation: Understanding the Global Regulatory Process, edited by Bignami, Francesca and Zaring, David, 305–34. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Matthew. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Jones, H. Stuart. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kagan, Elena. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114 (2001): 2245–2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., and Brennan-Marquez, Kiel. “Statutes and Democratic Self-Authorship.” William and Mary Law Review 56 (2014): 115–79.Google Scholar
Katyal, Neal Kumar. “Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today’s Most Dangerous Branch from Within.” Yale Law Journal 115 (2005): 2314–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, George H. Formosa Betrayed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. Germany and Republican China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. “Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943-1958.” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24 (1990): 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, John H. “Cultural Chauvinism in Comparative Law.” Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 5 (1997): 41–49.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’E ‘tat . New York: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lee, Young-ho (Yi Yeong-ho). “Colonial Modernity and the Investigation of Land Customs: A Comparison of Japan, Taiwan, and Korea.” Korea Journal 44, no. 2 (2004): 149–73.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. “The Impossibility of Legal Transplants.” Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, Arthur. Taiwan’s Politics: The Provincial Assemblyman’s World. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1978.Google Scholar
Lewis, Margaret K., and Jerome, A. Cohen. “How Taiwan’s Constitutional Court Reined in Police Power: Lessons for the People’s Republic of China.” Fordham International Law Journal 37, no. 4 (2013): 863–937.Google Scholar
Lin, Jih-Wen. Consequences of the Single Non-Transferrable Voting Rule: Comparing the Japan and Taiwan Experiences. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA (1996).Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. “Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 6, no. 4 (1971): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Martin, Jeffrey T. Sentiment, Reason, and Law: Policing in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Norms, Practices, and the Paradox of Deference: A Preliminary Inquiry into Agency Statutory Interpretation.” Administrative Law Review 57 (2005): 501–42.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Agency-Centered or Court-Centered Administrative Law? A Dialogue with Richard Pierce on Agency Statutory Interpretation.” Administrative Law Review 59 (2007): 889–904.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mathur, Nayanika. Paper Tiger: Law, Bureaucracy and the Developmental State in Himalayan India. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, Errol. “Regulatory Culture: A Theoretical Outline.” Law and Policy 9, no. 4 (1987): 355–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Gillian, and Stack, Kevin. “Internal Administrative Law.” Michigan Law Review 115 (2017): 1239–1307.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. “State, Economy, and the State Effect.” In State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn, edited by Steinmetz, George, 76–97. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Novak, William J. “Beyond Max Weber: The Need for a Democratic (Not Aristocratic) Theory of the Modern State.” The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville 36, no. 1 (2015): 43–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. “The Logic of the Developmental State.” Comparative Politics 24, no. 1 (1991): 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, Julia. Democracy: Anthropological Approaches. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research, 2008.Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas R. “Leviathan and Interpretive Revolution: The Administrative State, the Judiciary, and the Rise of Legislative History, 1890-1950.” Yale Law Journal 123 (2013): 266–403.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Phillips, Steven E. Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter with Nationalist China, 1945–1950. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Lindseth, Peter, eds. Comparative Administrative Law. New York: Edward Elgar, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. Colors and Cultures. Semiotica 16, no. 1 (1976): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shobe, Jarrod. “Agencies as Legislators: An Empirical Study of the Role of Agencies in the Legislative Process.” George Washington Law Review 85 (2017): 451–535.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Urban, Greg. “The Natural History of Discourse.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, edited by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, 1–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Singh, Mahendra P. German Administrative Law in Common Law Perspective. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supreme Administrative Court (最高行政法院 Zuigao Xingzheng Fayuan) , n.d. (materials published by the Supreme Administrative Court).Google Scholar
Tai, Po-fen 戴伯芬, and Lin 林宗弘, Zonghong. 高教崩壞: 市場化, 官僚化與少子女化的危機 (Higher Education Collapse: The Crisis of Marketization, Bureaucratization, and Low Birthrate). Taipei: 群學出版社 (Qunxue Publishing), 2015.Google Scholar
Taiwan Administrative Procedure Act (Taiwan APA). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030055.Google Scholar
Thelen, Tatjana, Vetters, Larissa, and Benda-Beckman, Keebet von. “Introduction to Stategraphy: toward a Relational Anthropology of the State.” Social Analysis 58, no. 3 (2014): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Translated by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, Wen-ling 杜文苓. 環境風險與公共治理：探索台灣環境民主實踐之道 (Environmental Risk and Public Administration: Exploring the Path of Taiwan’s Environmental Democratic Practice). Taipei: 五南 (Wunan Book Inc.), 2015.Google Scholar
Wang, Tay-sheng. “The Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20th Century: Toward a Liberal and Democratic Country.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 11 (2002): 531–60.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, [1974] 1993.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wu, Nai-teh. The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control within an Authoritarian Regime. Unpublished PhD diss. University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
Wyman, Bruce. The Principles of the Administrative Law Governing the Relations of Public Officers. St. Paul, MN: Keefe-Davidson Company, 1903.Google Scholar
Yeh, Jiunn-Rong. “Changing Forces of Constitutional and Regulatory Reform in Taiwan.” Journal of Chinese Law 4, no. 1 (1990): 83–100.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76, no. 6 (1997): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Angela Huyue, Liu, Jingchen, and Garoupa, Nuno. “Judging in Europe: Do Legal Traditions Matter?” Journal of Competition Law and Economics 14, no. 1 (2018): 144–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein. An Introduction to Comparative Law, rev. ed. Translated by Weir, Tony. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

STATUTES AND CONSTITUTIONS CITED

Constitution of the Republic of China (Taiwan). https://english.president.gov.tw/Page/94.Google Scholar
Taiwan Administrative Procedure Act.Google Scholar