Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:14:54.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence Despite Change: The Academic Gender Gap in Australian Law Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Angela Melville Open the ORCID record for Angela Melville [Opens in a new window]  and
Amy Barrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prior research has shown that while women have entered the legal profession in increasing numbers, the profession continues to privilege the norms, beliefs, and cultural practices of men. However, one aspect of the legal profession that has largely been overlooked, especially in Australia, is legal academia. This oversight is significant as legal academia provides the gateway into the legal profession. Women now make up approximately half of universities’ academic staff, are increasingly completing doctorate qualifications, and are moving into senior positions within academia. On the surface, these changes may suggest that women are now fully integrated into academia and that the academic gender gap has now resolved. We argue, however, that numerical inclusion does not necessarily challenge the male normative structures that underlie legal academia. This article draws on analysis of the biographies of seven hundred legal academics in Australian law schools and investigates differences between male and female legal academics in terms of level of appointment, academic qualifications and professional experience, research productivity, research interests, and mobility. It shows that while the gender gap has closed in some areas, the feminization of legal academia is a myth and female academics continue to face gendered barriers.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 607 - 634
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to acknowledge Patrick Morgan for his research assistance in collecting data.

References

REFERENCES

Ackers, Louise. “Managing Relationships in Peripatetic Careers: Scientific Mobility in the European Union.” Women’s Studies International Forum 27, no. 1 (2004): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Tracey. “Gender and Feminization in Health Care Professions.” Sociology Compass 4, no. 7 (2010): 454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiston, Sarah Jane, and Jisun, Jung. “Women Academics and Research Productivity: An International Comparison.” Gender and Education 27, no. 3 (2015): 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almer, Elizabeth, Margaret, Lightbody, and Louise, Single. “Successful Promotion or Segregation from Partnership? An Examination of the ‘Post-Senior Manager’ Position in Public Accounting and the Implications for Women’s Careers.” Accounting Forum 36, no. 2 (2012): 122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, Marina. “The Glass Ceiling for Women in Legal Education: Contract Positions and the Death of Tenure.” Journal Legal Education 50, no. 1 (2000): 1–15.Google Scholar
Arriola, Elvia. “It’s Not Over: Empowering the Different Voice in Legal Academia.” Berkeley Journal of Law and Justice 29, no. 2 (2014): 320–36.Google Scholar
Asmar, Christine. “Is There a Gendered Agenda in Academia? The Research Experience of Female and Male PhD Graduates in Australian Universities.” Higher Education 38, no. 3 (1999): 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission. Inquiry into Equality before the Law: Equality Report No 69. Part 1. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1994.Google Scholar
Australian Research Council. State of Australian University Research 2015-2016: Volume 1 ERA National Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2015.Google Scholar
Bair, Jeffrey H., and Boor, Myron. “The Academic Elite in Law: Linkages among Top-Ranked Law Schools.” Psychological Reports 68, no. 3 (1991): 891–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, Jeffrey H., Myron, Boor, and Alfredo, Montalvo. “Hiring Practices in Canadian Legal Education: Linkages among Top Ranked Law Schools.” Psychology Reports 84, no. 3 (1999): 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Maureen. Academic Careers and the Gender Gap. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barbour, Kim, and David, Marshall. “The Academic Online: Constructing Persona through the World Wide Web.” First Monday 17, no. 9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Katherine, and Elizabeth, Mertz. “Law School Climates: Job Satisfaction among Tenured US Law Professors.” Law & Social Inquiry 43, no. 2 (2018): 441–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Katy. “Citation as a Measure of ‘Impact’: Female Legal Academics at a Disadvantage?” Alternative Law Journal 44, no. 4 (2019): 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Peter. “Gender Differences and Factors Affecting Publication Productivity among Australian University Academics.” Journal of Sociology 48, no. 1 (2012): 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, Sue. Who Will Do Science? New York: Rockefeller Foundation, 1983.Google Scholar
Bhandari, Jagdeep S., Cafardi, Nicholas P., and Matthew, Martin. “Who Are These People? An Empirical Profile of the Nation’s Law School Deans.” Journal of Legal Education 48, no. 3 (1998): 329–38.Google Scholar
Bolton, Sharon, and Daniel, Muzio. “Can’t Live with ’Em; Can’t Live without ’Em: Gendered Segmentation in the Legal Profession.” Sociology 41, no. 1 (2007): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Sharon, and Daniel, Muzio. “The Paradoxical Processes of Feminization in the Professions: The Case of Established, Aspiring and Semi-Professions.” Women, Employment and Society 22, no. 2 (2008): 218–29.Google Scholar
Borthwick, Robert J., and Schau, Jordan R.. “Gatekeepers of the Profession: An Empirical Profile of the Nation’s Law Professors.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 25, no. 191 (1991): 200–01.Google Scholar
Brockman, Joan. “Dismantling or Fortifying Professional Monopolies? On Regulating Profession and Occupations.” Manitoba Law Journal 24, no. 2 (1996): 301–10.Google Scholar
Bromwich, Rebecca Jaremko. “Mothers in the Legal Profession Doubling Up on the Double Shift during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Never Waste a Crisis.” In Mothers, Mothering, and COVID-19: Dispatches from the Pandemic, edited by O’Reilly, Andrea and Fiona, J. Green, 131–40. Ontario: Demeter Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, John, Julia, Connell, Colin, Bryson, and Richard, Blackwell. “Managing Temporary Workers in Higher Education: Still at the Margin.” Personnel Review 35, no. 2 (2006): 207–25.Google Scholar
Burton, Clare. Gender Equity in Australian University Staffing. Canberra: Department of Education, Commonwealth of Australia, 1997.Google Scholar
Campos, Paul. “The Crisis of the American Law School.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 46, no. 1 (2012): 177–223.Google Scholar
Carasco, Emily. “Reflections on Employment Equity (The Hiring Component) and Law Schools in Ontario.” In Calling for Change: Women, Law and the Legal Profession, edited by Elizabeth, A. Sheehy and McIntyre, Sheila, 97–116. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Chang, Robert, and Davis, Adrienne D.. “Making Up Is Hard to Do: Race/Gender/Sexual Orientation in the Law School Classroom.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 33, no. 1 (2010): 1–59.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Sara, and Iain, Campbell. Scoping Study for an Attrition Study of Victorian Lawyers: Report to Victorian Law Foundation. Melbourne: Centre for Applied Social Research, RMIT, 2010.Google Scholar
Chused, Richard H. “The Hiring and Retention of Minorities and Women on American Law School Faculties.” University of Pennsylvania. Law Review 37, no. 2 (1998): 537–69.Google Scholar
Cole, Jonathan R., and Harriet Zuckerman. “The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication of Men and Women Scientists.” Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2 (1984): 217–58.Google Scholar
Collier, Richard. “Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 19 (1989): 427–51.Google Scholar
Collier, Richard. “The Changing University and the (Legal) Academic Career – Rethinking the Relationship between Women, Men and the ‘Private Life’ of the Law School.” Legal Studies 22, no. 1 (2002): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Cynthia L. “Women Ascend in Deanships as Law Schools Undergo Dramatic Change.” Perspectives 24, no. 8 (2016): 8–14.Google Scholar
Cooray, Arusha, Reetu, Verma, and Lynne, Wright. “Does a Gender Disparity Exist in Academic Rank? Evidence from an Australian University.” Applied Economics 46, no. 20 (2014): 2441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotropia, Christopher A., and Lee Petherbridge. “Gender Disparity in Law Review Citation Rates.” William and Mary Law Review 59, no. 3 (2017): 771–813.Google Scholar
Cowley, Jill. “Confronting the Reality of Casualisation in Australia: Recognising Difference and Embracing Sessional Staff in Law Schools.” Queensland University Technology Law and Justice Journal 10, no. 1 (2010): 27–43.Google Scholar
Curtis, John, and Monica, Jacobe. AAUP Contingent Faculty Index. Washington DC: American Association of University Professors, 2006.Google Scholar
Darabi, Mitra, Ann, Macaskill, and Lisa, Reidy. “A Qualitative Study of the UK Academic Role: Positive Features, Negative Aspects and Associated Stressors in a Mainly Teaching-Focused University.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41, no. 4 (2017): 566–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, Debiprasad. “Recruiting and Developing Second-Career Academics in Universities.” In Postgraduate Education in Higher Education, edited by Padró, Fernando, Erwee, Ronel, Harmes, Meredith, Harmes, Marcus, and Danaher, Patrick, 1–16. New York: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar
Deo, Meera E. “Looking Forward to Diversity in Legal Academia.” Berkeley Journal of Law and Justice 29, no. 2 (2014): 352–87.Google Scholar
Deo, Meera E. “A Better Tenure Battle: Fighting Bias in Teaching Evaluations.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 31, no. 1 (2015): 7–43.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Skills and Employment. 2017 Staff Full-Time Equivalence. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2017.Google Scholar
Devonshire, Peter. “Indigenous Students at Law School: Comparative Perspectives.” Adelaide Law Review 35, no. 2 (2014): 309–30.Google Scholar
Dobbie, David, and Ian, Robinson. “Reorganizing Higher Education in the United States and Canada: The Erosion of Tenure and the Unionization of Contingent Faculty.” Labor Studies Journal 33, no. 2 (2008): 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, Ian. “PhDs in Australia, from the Beginning.” Australian Universities Review 54, no. 1 (2012): 94–101.Google Scholar
Durako, Jo Ann. “Second-Class Citizens in the Pink Ghetto: Gender Bias in Legal Writing.” Journal of Legal Education 50, no. 4 (2000): 562–86.Google Scholar
Durako, Jo Ann. “Dismantling Hierarchies: Occupational Segregation of Legal Writing Faculty in Law Schools: Separate and Unequal.” University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 73, no. 2 (2004): 253–87.Google Scholar
Egghe, Leo. “Theory and Practice of the G-Index.” Scientometrics 69, no. 1 (2006): 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Wells, Martin T.. “Inbreeding in Law School Hiring: Assessing Performance of Faculty Hired from Within.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. 21 (2000): 369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, Christine Haight. “Confronting Expectations: Women in the Legal Academy.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 8, no. 2 (1996): 333–58.Google Scholar
Faugier, Jean, and Mary, Sargeant. “Sampling Hard to Reach Populations.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26, no. 4 (1997): 790–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, Hannah. “Expanding Higher Education: Institutional Responses in Australia from the Post-War Era to the 1970s.” International Journal of the History of Education 51, no. 3 (2015): 365–80.Google Scholar
Fossum, Donna. “Women Law Professors.” Law and Society Inquiry 5, no. 4 (1980): 903–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Mary F. “Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists.” Social Studies of Science 35, no. 1 (2005): 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaber, Paula. “‘Just Trying to Be Human in This Place’: The Legal Education of Twenty Women.” Yale Law Journal and Feminism 10, no. 2 (1998): 165–275.Google Scholar
George, Tracey E., and Albert H. Yoon. “The Labor Market for New Law Professors.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11, no. 1 (2014): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glickstein, Howard. “Law Schools: Where the Elite Meet to Teach.” Nova Law Review 10, no. 2 (1985): 541–46.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Patricia, and Rosemary, Francis. “Academic Women and Research Leadership in Twentieth-Century Australia.” In Diversity in Leadership: Australian Women, Past and Present, edited by Damousi, Joy, Rubenstein, Kim, and Tomsic, Mary, 207–36. Canberra: Australian National Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Haveman, Heather A., and Ogi Radic. “Educational Background and Stratification in the Legal Academia: Invasion of the Body Snatchers … or More of the Same?” Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 21, no. 91 (2017): 1–53.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Jorge E. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, no. 46 (2005): 16569–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, Rosemary. “Women in the Legal Profession: The Australian Profile.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 87–102. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Inanc, Ozlem, and Onur, Tuncer. “The Effect of Academic Inbreeding on Scientific Effectiveness.” Scientometrics 88, no. 3 (2011): 889–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Donna, and Perry, France J.. “Institionalised Sexism in Universities: The Case of Geographically Bound Academic Women.” NSWA Journal 1, no. 4 (1980): 644–59.Google Scholar
Kay, Fiona M. “Professionalism and Exclusionary Practices: Shifting the Terrain of Privilege and Professional Monopoly.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 11, no. 1 (2004): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, Naz, and Margaret, Weber. “Faculty Research Productivity: Gender and Discipline Differences.” Journal of Family and Consumer Science 95, no. 4 (2003): 46–52.Google Scholar
Kirk, Linda J. “Portia’s Place: Australia’s First Women Lawyers.” Australian Journal of Legal History 1, no. 1 (1995): 75–91.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Marjorie E. “Rooms of Their Own: An Empirical Study of Occupational Segregation by Gender among Law Professors.” University of Missouri-Kansas City Law 73, no. 2 (2004): 294–350.Google Scholar
Kotkin, Minna J. “Of Authorship and Audacity: An Empirical Study of Gender Disparity and Privilege in the Top Ten Law Review.” Women’s Rights Law Reporter 31, no. 4 (2010): 385–446.Google Scholar
Kyvik, Svein, and Mari, Teigen. “Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity.” Science, Technology & Human Values 21, no. 1 (1996): 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
Lafferty, George, and Jenny, Fleming. “The Restructuring of Academic Work in Australia: Power, Management and Gender.” British Journal of Sociology 21, no. 2 (2000): 257–67.Google Scholar
Law Council of Australia. National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces. Canberra: Law Council of Australia, 2019.Google Scholar
Leahey, Erin. “Gender Differences in Productivity: Research Specialization as a Missing Link.” Gender & Society 20, no. 6 (2006): 754–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “How to Rank Law Schools.” Indian Law Journal 81, no. 47 (2006): 48–52.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “Top Producers of New Law Teachers, 2003-2007.” Brian Latter’s Law School Rankings. March 20, 2019. http://www.leiterrankings.com/jobs/2008job_teaching.shtml.Google Scholar
Levinson, Justine, and Danielle, Young. “Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study.” Duke Journal of Gender, Law and Policy 18, no. 1 (2012): 795–826.Google Scholar
Levit, Nancy. “Keeping Feminism in Its Place: Sex Segregation and the Domestication of Female Academics.” University of Kansas Law Review 49, no. 4 (2000): 775–801.Google Scholar
Locke, William. Shifting Academic Careers: Implications for Enhancing Professionalism in Teaching and Supporting Learning. London: Institute of Education, University of London, 2014.Google Scholar
Long, Scott. “Measures of Sex-Differences in Scientific Productivity.” Social Forces 71, no. 1 (1992): 158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Ioana. “Approved Routes and Alternative Paths: The Construction of Women’s Careers in Large Accounting Firms. Evidence from the Big French Four.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23, no. 4 (2012): 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, Teresa, and Michelle, Wallace. “Sixteen Years of Change for Australian Female Academics: Progress or Segmentation.” Australian Universities’ Review 55, no. 2 (2013): 60–71.Google Scholar
May, Robyn, Glenda, Strachan, and David, Peetz. “Workforce Development and Renewal in Australian Universities and the Management of Casual Academic Staff.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 10, no. 3 (2013): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrier, Debra Branch. “Gender and Career Dynamics within a Segmented Professional Labor Market: The Case of Law Academia.” Social Forces 81, no. 4 (2003): 1201–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElrath, Karen. “Gender, Career Disruption, and Academic Rewards.” The Journal of Higher Education 63, no. 3 (1992): 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “Women, Representation and the Legal Academy.” Legal Studies 19, no. 1 (1999): 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “The Status of Women Lawyers in the United Kingdom.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 139–58. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Melville, Angela Lee. “Barriers to Entry into Law School: An Examination of Socio-Economic and Indigenous Disadvantage.” Legal Education Review 24, no. 1 (2014): 45–67.Google Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “It Is the Worst Time in Living History to Be a Law Graduate: Or Is It? Does Australia Have Too Many Law Graduates?” The Law Teacher 51, no. 2 (2017a): 203–26.Google Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “Educational Disadvantages and Indigenous Law Students: Barriers and Potential Solutions.” Asian Journal of Legal Education 4, no. 2 (2017b): 95–115.Google Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “The Status of Women on Law School Faculties: Recent Trends in Hiring.” University of Illinois Law Review 1995, no. 1 (1995): 93–104.Google Scholar
McGlynn, Clare. “Are Women Stuck on the Academic Ladder? An Empirical Perspective.” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2000): 249–52.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah Jones, and Reskin, Barbara F.. “The Double Minority: Empirical Evidence of a Double Standard in Law School Hiring of Minority Women.” California Law Review 65, no. 5 (1992): 2299–2360.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah Jones, and Reskin, Barbara F.. “Sex, Race, and Credentials: The Truth about Affirmative Action in Law School Hiring.” Columbia Law Review 97, no. 2 (1997): 199–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Deborah Jones, Reskin, Barbara F., and Michelle, Fondell. “Family, Place, and Career: The Gender Paradox in Law School Hiring.” Wisconsin Law Review 1993, no. 2 (1993): 395–464.Google Scholar
Minello, Alessandra. “The Pandemic and the Female Parent.” Nature, April 17, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Kirsten S., Saba, Ozyurt, Ted, Wrigley, and Amy, Alexander. “Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions.” Perspectives on Politics 6, no. 2 (2008): 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Adele M. “Straightening Up: Black Women Law Professors, Interracial Relationships, and Academic Fit(ting) In.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 33, no. 1 (2010): 85–98.Google Scholar
Murray, Georgina. “New Zealand Women Lawyers at the End of the Twentieth Century.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 123–38. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire. Law and the Sexes: Explorations in Feminist Jurisprudence. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1990.Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire. “Who Are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects.” Modern Law Review 66, no. 3 (2003): 246–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakhaie, M. Reza. “Universalism, Ascription and Academic Rank: Canadian Professors, 1987-2000.” Canadian Review of Sociology 44, no. 3 (2007): 361–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Richard K. “Women in Legal Education: What the Statistics Show.” Journal of Legal Education 50, no. 3 (2000): 313–57.Google Scholar
Niederle, Muriel, and Lise, Vesterlund. “Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, no. 3 (2007): 1067–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Hillary, Higgins, George E., and Gabbidon, Shaun L.. “The Influence of Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Faculty Perceptions on Scholarly Productivity in Criminology/Criminal Justice.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 22, no. 1 (2011): 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, Belinda. “‘I Just Couldn’t Fit In’: Gender and Unequal Outcomes in Academic Careers.” Gender Work & Organization 12, no. 1 (2005): 5–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, Belinda. Teaching-Focused Academic Appointments in Australian Universities: Recognition, Specialisation, or Stratification? Canberra: Office for Teaching and Learning, Commonwealth of Australia, 2013.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Paul. “Describing and Explaining Research Productivity.” Higher Education 28, no. 2 (1994): 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramshaw, Sara, and Wesley Pue, W.. “Feminism Unqualified: A Review of Margaret Thornton’s Dissonance and Distrust: Women in the Legal Profession.” Law in Context 15, no. 1 (1997): 166–78.Google Scholar
Redding, Richard E. “Where Did You Go to Law School? Gatekeeping for the Professoriate and Its Implications for Legal Education.” Journal of Legal Education 53, no. 4 (2003): 594–614.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, Rachel A., and Jo Ann Jones. “Patterns and Effects of Geographic Mobility for Academic Women and Men.” Journal of Higher Education 58, no. 5 (1987): 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothausen-Vange, Teresa J., Marler, Janet H., and Wright, Patrick M.. “Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers.” Sex Roles 53, no. 9–10 (2005): 727–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Suzanne, John, Burgess, Julia, Connell, and Egbert, Groen. “Casual Academic Staff in an Australian University: Marginalized and Excluded.” Tertiary Education and Management 19, no. 2 (2013): 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Margaret V. “Women in Corporate Law Teaching: A Tale of Two Generations.” Maryland Law Review 65, no. 2 (2006): 666–91.Google Scholar
Samkin, Grant, and Annika, Schneider. “Using University Websites to Profile Accounting Academics and Their Research Outputs: A Three Country Study.” Meditari Accountancy Research 20, no. 1 (2014): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike. “The Status of Women Lawyers in Germany.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 271–94. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike, Gisela, Shaw, Margaret, Thornton, and Rosemary, Auchmuty, eds. Gender and Careers in the Legal Academy. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibel, Robert F. “Do Deans Discriminate: An Examination of Lower Salaries Paid to Women Clinical Teachers.” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 6, no. 2 (1996): 541–62.Google Scholar
Shauman, Kimberlee A., and Xie, Yu. “Geographical Mobility of Scientists: Sex Differences and Family Constraints.” Demography 33, no. 4 (1996): 455–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell. “Who Publishes in Australia’s Top Law Journals?” University of New South Wales Law Journal 35, no. 1 (2012): 203–47.Google Scholar
Smyth, Russell, and Vinod, Mishra. “Academic Inbreeding and Research Productivity and Impacts in Australian Law Schools.” Scientometrics 98, no. 1 (2014): 583–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary. “The Myth of Feminisation: Women and Cultural Change in the Legal Profession.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 1, no. 1 (1994): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary. “Manageralism and the Legal Profession: A New Professional Paradigm.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 2, no. 2 (1995): 159–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary. “Women Solicitors in a Fractured Profession: Intersections of Gender and Professionalism in England and Wales.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 9, no. 3 (2002): 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanchi, Kathryn M. “Who Next, The Janitors? A Socio-Feminist Critique of the Status Hierarchy of Law Professors.” UMCK Law Review 73, no. 2 (2004): 467–97.Google Scholar
Steinpreis, Rhea E., Anders, Katie A., and Dawn, Ritzke. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41, no. 7–8 (1999): 509–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, Glenda, Kay, Broadbent, Gillian, Whitehouse, David, Peetz, and Janis, Bailey. “Looking for Women in Australian Universities.” Research and Development in Higher Education 34 (2011): 308–19.Google Scholar
Strachan, Glenda, Janis, Bailey, Michelle, Wallace, and Carolyn, Troup. “Gender Equity in Professional and General Staff in Australian Universities: The Contemporary Picture.” Labour and Industry 23, no. 3 (2013): 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symmonds, Matthews R.E., Gemmell, Neil J., Braisher, Tasmin L., Gorringe, Kylie L., and Elgar, Mark A.. “Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance.” PloS One 1, no. 1 (2006): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tancred, Peta. “Outsiders/Insiders: Women and Professional Norms.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 1 (1999): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teodorescu, Daniel. “Correlates of Faculty Publication Productivity: A Cross-National Analysis.” Higher Education 39, no. 2 (2000): 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. Dissonance and Distrust: Women in the Legal Profession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. “Feeling Chilly (Again) in the Legal Academy.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 18, no. 1 (2003): 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. “The Mirage of Merit: Reconstituting the ‘Ideal Academic.’” Australian Feminist Studies 12, no. 76 (2013): 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. “The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia.” Laws 4, no. 3 (2015): 314–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Margaret. “The First and Last(?) Feminist Law Professors in Australia.” In Gender and Careers in the Legal Academy, edited by Schultz, Ulrike, Shaw, Gisela, Thornton, Margaret, and Auchmuty, Rosemary, 457–74. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar
Toutkoushian, Robert K., Bellas, Marcia L., and Moore, John V.. “The Interaction Effects of Gender, Race, and Martial Status on Faculty Salaries.” The Journal of Higher Education 78, no. 5 (2007): 572–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbis. National Profile of Solicitors: Final. Sydney: Law Society of NSW, 2019.Google Scholar
Viglione, Guiliana. “Are Women Publishing Less during the Pandemic? Here’s What the Data Say.” Nature. 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01294-9.Google Scholar
Wallace, Alison, Chloe, Harkness, Lee, Holloway, Suzie, Hatherly, and Diane, Fase. National Attrition and Re-Engagement Study (NARS) Report. Sydney: Urbis, 2014.Google Scholar
Wallace, Michelle, and Marchant, Teresa. “Female Administrative Managers in Australian Universities: Not Male and Not Academic.” Journal of Higher Education and Policy 33, no. 6 (2011): 567–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Nicole. “Indigenous People in Legal Education: Staring into a Mirror without Reflection.” Indigenous Law Bulletin 6, no. 8 (2005): 4–7.Google Scholar
Wells, Celia. “Ladies in Waiting: The Women Law Professors’ Story.” Sydney Law Review 23, no. 2 (2001): 167–84.Google Scholar
Wells, Celia. “The Remains of the Day: The Women Law Professors Project.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 225–46. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
West, Martha S., and John W. Curtis. AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators. Washington DC: American Association of University Professors, 2006.Google Scholar
West, Robin. “Women in the Legal Academy: A Brief History of Feminist Legal Theory.” Fordham Law Review 87, no. 3 (2018): 977–1003.Google Scholar
White, Kate. “Leaking Pipeline: Women Postgraduate and Early Career Researchers in Australia.” Tertiary Education and Management 10, no. 3 (2004): 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Kate. “Legislative Frameworks for Equal Opportunities.” In Gender, Power and Management: A Cross Cultural Analysis of Higher Education, edited by Bagilhole, Barbara and White, Kate, 20–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, Hilary, and Lynette, Browning. “Gender Equality in Academia: A Critical Reflection.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37, no. 3 (2015): 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, Hilary, Shard, Lorenzo, Lyn, Browning, and Colleen, Chesterman. “Academic Women’s Promotions in Australian Universities.” Employee Relations 28, no. 6 (2006): 505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witz, Anne. Professions and Patriarchy. London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workplace Gender Equality Agency. Gendered-Impact of Covid-19. 2020. https://www.wgea.gov.au/topics/gendered-impact-of-covid-19.Google Scholar
Xie, Yu, and Kimberlee, Shauman. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle.” American Sociological Review 63, no. 6 (1998): 847–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenoff, Elyce H., and Kathryn V. Lorio. “What We Know, What We Think We Know and What We Don’t Know about Women Law Professors.” Arizonia Law Review 25, no. 4 (1983): 896–906.Google Scholar