Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T21:24:09.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pay Gap between Male and Female Jobs: Organizational and Legal Realities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Paula England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legalizing Gender Inequality results from a decade of research in which Robert Nelson, a sociologist of law, combined forces with William Bridges, a sociologist who has studied labor markets. This combination led to an unusual and creative approach. The authors chose four class-action court cases involving sex discrimination in pay, and did in-depth studies of the judicial decisions, testimony, exhibits, and depositions from each. They also obtained and reanalyzed statistical data sets involved in the cases and, where possible, interviewed key actors.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Summer 2000 , pp. 913 - 931
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bergmann, Barbara. 1986. The Economic Emergence of Women. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
England, Paula. 1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
England, Paula, Farkas, George, Stanek Kilbourne, Barbara, and Dou, Thomas. 1988. Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects. American Sociological Review 53:544–58.Google Scholar
England, Paula, Lori Reid, L., and Stanek Kilboume, Barbara. 1996. The Effect of the Sex Composition of Jobs on Starting Wages in an Organization: Findings from the NLSY. Demography 33(4):511–21.Google Scholar
Barbara Kilbourne, Paula England, Farkas, George, Beron, Kurt, and Weir, Dorothea. 1994. Returns to Skills, Compensating Differentials, and Gender Bias: Effects of Occupational Characteristics on the Wages of White Women and Men. American Journal of Sociology 100:689–719.Google Scholar
Spain, Daphne, and Suzanne Bianchi, M. 1996. Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Steinbeg, Ronnie J. 1990. Social Construction of Skill: Gender, Power, and Comparable Worth. Work and Occupations 17:449–82.Google Scholar
Steinbeg, . 1995. Gendered Instructions: Cultural Lag and Gender Bias in the Hay System of Job Evaluation. In Gender Inequality at Work, ed. Jacobs, Jerry, 57–92. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Ronnie J., and Haignere, Lois. 1987. Equitable Compensation: Methodological Criteria for Comparable Worth. In Ingredients for Women's Employment Policy, ed. Bose, Christine and Spitze, Glenna, 157–82. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Cases and Statutes

American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) v. State of Washington, No. C82–465T (1983), U.S. District Court, W. Wash.Google Scholar
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) v. State of Washington, 770 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
Bennett Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, [Volume Number of Book Where Statute Appears?] U.S.C § 2000e-2(h) (1964).Google Scholar
Christensen v. State of Iowa, 563 F.2d 353 (8th Cir. 1977).Google Scholar
County of Washington, Oregon v. Gunther, 452 U.S. 161 (1981).Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Sears Roebuck and Co., 839 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1988).Google Scholar
Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1990).Google Scholar
International UAW v. State of Michigan, 673 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. Mich. 1987); affd 886 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1989).Google Scholar
Spaulding v. University of Washington, 740 F.2d 686, (9th Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
Title VII of the civil Rights Act of 1964, [volume number?] U.S.C. 2000e-1 (1982). Wambheim v. J. C. Penney, 705 F.2d 1492 (9th Cir. 1983).Google Scholar