Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:59:38.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of the Ordinary: Law, Power, Culture, and the Commonplace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Naomi Mezey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Section Symposium: The Common Place of Law
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 145 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auden, W. H. 1966. Collected Shorter Poems 1927–;1957. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Austin, Regina. 1988. Employer Abuse, Worker Resistance, and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Stanford Law Review 41:1–59.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger ed. 1994. Law and Society. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Certeau, De, Michel, . 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1986. Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review 38:623–87.Google Scholar
Feldman, Heidi Li. Forthcoming. Care, Character, and American Tort Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III, Morton, Honvitz J., and Thomas Reed, A., eds. 1993. American Legal Realism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–;1977, ed. Gordon, Colin; trans. Gordon, Colin et al. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1980b. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1, An Introduction, trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1982. Afterword: The Subject and Power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Hubert Dreyfus, L. and Rahinow, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1986. The Law and Society Movement. Stanfwd Law Review 38:763–80.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter. 1984. The Phenomenology of Rights-Consciousness and the Pact of the Withdrawn Selves. Texas Law Review 62:1563–98.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State. Law and Society Review 32:409–71.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1994. The Elusive Transformation. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 6:137–62.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas. 1983. Langdell's Orthodoxy. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45:1–53.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet E. 1994. Sexual Orientation and the Politics of Biology: A Critique of the Argument from Immutability. Stanford Law Review 46:503–68.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1992. Foucault's Expulsion of Law: Toward a Retrieval. Law and Social Inquiry 17:1–38.Google Scholar
Kairys, David, ed. 1990. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark. 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1993. Sexy Bessing Etc.: Essays on Power and Politics of Cultural Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J. 1990a. Goose Bumps and “The Search for Intelligent Life” in Socio-Legal Studies: After Twenty-Five Years. Law and Society Review 24:7–33.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J. 1990b. “His” and “Her” Story: The Life and Future of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18:69–90.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1931. Some Realism about Realism—Responding to Dean Pound. Harvard Law Rewiew 44:1222–64.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1989. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W., and March, Tracey. 1995. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A Socio-Political Assessment. In Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, ed. Sarat, Austin and Susan Silbey, S. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Ewen: Legal Consciousness Among Working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. Mapping Law and Society. In Sarat, et al. 1998.Google Scholar
Note. 1982. Round and Round the Bramble Bush: From Legal Realism to Critical Legal Scholarship. Harvard Law Review 95:1669–90.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. “…The Law Is All Over”: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2:343–79.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan, eds. 1998. Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transfonnations in Law and Society Research. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas, Kearns R., eds. 1993. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Silbey, Susan. 1988. The Pull of the Policy Audience. Law and Policy 10:97–166.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 1989. A Sociological Interpretation of the Relationship between Law and Society. In Law and the Ordering of Our Life Together, ed. John Neuhaus, Richard. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 1992. Making a Place for a Cultural Analysis of Law. Law & Social Inquiry 17:39–48.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S., and Sarat, Austin. 1987. Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research. Law and Society Review 21:165–74.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1999. Law After Society. Law and Social Inquiry 24:143–94.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1990. Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18:1–55.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., and Esser, John. 1989. “Critical Empiricism” in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box? Law and Social Inquiry 14:3–52.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1980. Post-Realist Legal Scholarship. Wisconsin Law Review 1980:1383–1401.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1998. “Everything Old Is New Again”: Early Reflections on the “New Chicago School. Wisconsin Law Review 1998:579–90.Google Scholar
West, Robin L. 1987. The Difference in Women's Hedonic Lives: A Phenomenological Critique of Feminist Legal Theory. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 3:81–145.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Richard. 1988. New and Collected Poems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar