Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:51:36.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Surveying the Whole Legal Forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Robert A. Kagan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on Kagan's Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 833 - 872
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, Kazumasu, and John, John. 2000. Poles Apart: Industrial Waste Management Regulation and Enforcement in the United States and Japan. In Kagan and Axelrad 2000.Google Scholar
Aoki, Kazumasu, Robert, A. Kagan, and Lee, Lee. 2000. Industrial Effluent Control in the United States and Japan. In Kagan and Axelrad 2000.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S., and Robert, S. Summers. 1987. Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Axelrad, Lee. 2000. Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Manufacturing Sites in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. In Kagan and Axelrad 2000.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and John, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Badaracco, Joseph L. 1985. Loading the Dice: A Five Country Study of Vinyl Chloride Regulation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene, and Robert, A. Kagan. 2002. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. 2d ed. New Brunswick, N. J.: Transaction Books. Original edition, Phildelphia: Temple University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1972. The Boundaries of Legal Sociology. Yale Law Journal 81: 1086–1100.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1994. The Infrastructure for Avoiding Civil Litigation: Comparing Cultures of Legal Behavior in the Netherlands and West Germany. Law and Society Review 28: 789–808.Google Scholar
Bogart, W. A. 2002. Consequences: The Impact of Law and Its Complexity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger. 1998. Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries. Law and Society Review 32: 141–74.Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig. 1993. The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1993. The Nursing Home Industry. In Beyond the Law: Crime in Complex Organizations, ed. Michael, Tonry and Albert, J. Reiss Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, David, and Charles, E. Lindblom. 1970. A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press/MacMillan.Google Scholar
Brickman, Ronald, Sheila, Jasanoff, and Thomas, Thomas. 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brisbin, Richard A. Jr., Susan, Hunter, and Kevin, Kevin. 2002. Adversarial Legalism in Planning, Zoning, and Land Use Regulatory Practice. Paper presented a the Joint Meeting of the Law and Society Association and the Canadian Law and Society Association, Vancouver, B. C., May 30-June 2.Google Scholar
Burke, Thomas F. 2002. Lawyers, Lawsuits and Legal Rights: The Battle over Litigation in American Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Christopher, David, L. Kirp, and Daniel, Daniel. 199899. Taming Adversarial Legalism: The Port of Oakland's Dredging Saga Revisited. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 2: 179–216.Google Scholar
Church, Thomas W., and Robert, Robert. 1993. Cleaning up the Mess: Implementation Strategies in Superfund. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, and Jennifer, Jennifer. 2001. Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Tom, Tom. 1996. Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models. International Review of Law and Economics 16: 295–313.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, Penny. 1997a. An Essay on the Importance and Neglect of the Magistracy. Criminal Law Review 1997: 627–43.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, Penny. 1997b. For the New Lord Chancellor-Some Causes for Concern about Magistrates. Criminal Law Review 1997: 861–74.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha A. 2002. Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren, Steven, Abraham, and Howard, Howard. 1992. Professional Construction of Law: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful Discharge. Law and Society Review 26: 47–84.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2003. The Judge over Your Shoulder: Is Adversarial Legalism Exceptionally American Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 743–70.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Setsuo, Miyazawa, eds. 2002. The Japanese Adversary System in Context: Controversies and Comparisons. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Feldman, Eric. 2000. Blood Justice: Courts, Conflict and Compensation in Japan, France and the United States. Law and Society Review 34: 651–702.Google Scholar
Frase, Richard S. 1990. Comparative Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: How Do the French Do It. How Can We Find Out, and Why Should We Care California Law Review 78: 542–683.Google Scholar
Frase, Richard, and Thomas, Thomas. 1995. German Criminal Justice. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 18: 317–60.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society. UCLA Law Review 31: 4–71.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce. 2000. The Equal Employment Opportunity Law: A Decade of Change for Japanese Women. Law and Policy 20: 385–407.Google Scholar
Gottschall, John. 1986. Reagan's Appointments to the U. S. Courts of Appeals. Judicature, June/July, 49–54.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Robert, A. Kagan, and Dorothy, Dorothy. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee, and Joseph, Joseph. 1992. Everyday justice: Responsibility and the Individual in the United States and Japan. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hanf, Kenneth, and Cor, Cor. 1991. Maintenance Dredging in the Port of Rotterdam: Trading Off Environmental Quality and Economic Development. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, Law and Society Association, Amsterdam, June 26–29.Google Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R. et al. 1991. Compensation for Accidental Injuries in the United States. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
Hermann, Joachim. 1992. Bargaining Justice–a Bargain for German Criminal Justice University of Pittsburgh Law Review 53: 755–76.Google Scholar
Hughes, Graham. 1984. English Criminal Justice: Is It Better Than Ours Arizona Law Review 27: 507.Google Scholar
Ieetswaart, Heleen. 1990. The International Comparison of Court Caseloads: The Experience of the European Working Group. Law and Society Review 24: 571–93.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 1998. The Organization of Prosecution and the Possibility of Order. Law and Society Review 32: 247–308.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 1999. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2003. American Law in Japanese Perspective. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 771–98.Google Scholar
Jost, Timothy Stoltzfus. 1998. Health Care Rationing in the Courts: A Comparative Study. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 21: 639–714.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 1984. The Routinization of Debt Collection: An Essay on Social Change and Conflict in the Courts. Law and Society Review 18: 324–71.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 1994. Do Lawyers Cause Adversarial Legalism Law and Social Inquiry 19: 1–62.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 1995. What Sociolegal Scholars Should Do When There Is Too Much Law to Study. Journal of Law and Society 22: 140–48.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 1997. Should Europe Worry about Adversarial Legalism Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17: 165–84.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 199899. Adversarial Legalism: Tamed or Still Wild New York University Journal of Legislation and Policy 2: 217–45.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2000. Comparing National Styles of Regulation in Japan and the United States. Law and Policy 22: 225–44.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2002. Adversarial Legalism and American Criminal Justice. In Feeley and Miyazawa 2002.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., and Lee, Axelrad, eds. 2000. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., and William, William. 2001. The Politics of Tobacco Regulation in the United States. In Rabin and Sugarman 2001.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., Martin, Krygier, and Kenneth, Winston, eds. 2002. Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick Lanham, Md . and Berkeley, Calif.: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kirp, David L. 1979. Doing Good by Doing Little: Race and Schooling in Britain. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirp, David L. 1982. Professionalization as a Policy Choice: British Special Education in Comparative Perspective. World Politics 34: 137–74.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert. 1991. Propensity to Sue in England and the United States of America: Blaming and Claiming in Tort Cases. Journal of Law and Society 18: 400–423.Google Scholar
Langbein, John. 1979. Land without Plea Bargaining: How The Germans Do It. Michigan Law Review 78: 204–25.Google Scholar
Langbein, John. 1985. The German Advantage in Civil Procedure. University of Chicago Law Review 52: 823–66.Google Scholar
Langbein, John. 1994. Will Contests. Yale Law Journal 103: 2039–48.Google Scholar
Levin, Mark A. 1997. Smoke around the Rising Sun: An American Look at Tobacco Regulation in Japan. Stanford Law and Policy Review 8: 99–123.Google Scholar
Machura, Stefan. 2000. Justice Evaluations by Lay German Assessors. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Miami Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
Marcus, Richard L. 2002. Reform through Rulemaking Washington University Law Quarterly 80: 901–44.Google Scholar
Markesinis, Basil. 1990. Litigation-Mania in England, Germany, and the USA: Are We So Very Different Cambridge Law Journal 49: 233–76.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry. 1983. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and Alida, Brill. 1983. Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep. 1995. Separation of Powers and the Strategy of Rights: The Expansion of Special Education. In The New Politics of Public Policy, ed. Marc, Landy and Martin, Levin. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, Curtis, and Geoffrey, Geoffrey. 2000. Regulatory Failure and the Collapse of Japan's Home Mortgage Lending Industry: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Law and Policy 22: 245–90.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard, and Austin, Austin. 1981. Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture. Law and Society Review 15: 525–66.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1989. The Politics of the Bureaucratic State. In Can the Government Govern? ed. Chubb, J. and Peterson, P. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Muller, Ingo. 1991. Hitler's Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003. Beyond Compare? Criticizing “The American Way of Law. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 799–832.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 1999. Paying Workers or Paying Lawyers: Employee Termination Practices in the United States and Canada. Law and Policy: 21: 247–82.Google Scholar
Niemeijer, Bert. 1989. Urban Land-Use and Building Control in The Netherlands: Flexible Decisions in a Rigid System. Law and Policy 11: 121–52.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe. 1969. Administrative Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe. 1976. For Jurisprudential Sociology. Law and Society Review 10: 525–45.Google Scholar
Ochoa, Michael F. 1997. A Culture of Law: Street-Level Decision Making in the Social Security Administration. Ph. D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Peters, Antonie. 1992, Some Comparative Observations on the Criminal Process in Holland and Japan. Journal of the Japan-Netherlands Institute 4: 247.Google Scholar
Pizzi, William. 1999. Trials without Truth. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitz, K., Crowley, J., and Bangit, E. 2002. Assessing State External Review Programs and the Effects of Pending Federal Patients' Rights Legislation. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Institute for Health Care Research and Policy.Google Scholar
Quam, Lois, Robert, Dingwall, and Paul, Fenn. 1987. Medical Malpractice in Perspective. British Medical Journal 294: 1529.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert 2001. The Third Wave of Tobacco Tort Litigation. In Rabin and Sugarman 2001.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert, and Stephen, Sugarman, eds. 2001. Regulating Tobacco. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric, B. Rasmusen. 2001. Why Are Japanese Judges So Conservative in Politically Charged Cases American Political Science Review 95 (2): 331–44.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. 2000. Employment Discrimination or Sexual Violence? Defining Sexual Harassment in American and French Law. Law and Society Review 34: 1091–1127.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph. 2003. Adversarial Legalism and Civil Litigation: Prospects for Change. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 719–42.Google Scholar
Scheter, Nancy. 2001. Who Drives the Ideological Makeup of the Lower Federal Courts in a Divided Government Law and Society Review 35: 191–218.Google Scholar
Scholz, John T. 1984. Cooperation, Deterrence and the Ecology of Enforcement. Law and Society Review 18: 179–224.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary. 1991. Product Liability and Medical Malpractice in Comparative Context. In The Liability Maze, ed. Peter, Huber and Robert, Litan. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle A. 1999. Institutions and Environmental Performance in Seventeen Western Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 29.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey, and Harold, J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, Jeffery M. 1995. Litigation as a Local Political Resource: Courts in Controversies over Land Use in France, Germany and the United States. Law and Society Review 29: 475–516.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1969. Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Somaya, Deepak. 2000. Obtaining and Protecting Patents in the United States, Europe and Japan. In Kagan and Axelrad 2000.Google Scholar
Tanase, Takao. 1990. The Management of Disputes: Automobile Accident Compensation in Japan. Law and Society Reveiw 24: 651–88.Google Scholar
Ulc, Otto. 1972. The Judge in a Communist State. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. 1987. Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco. 2000. Why Is the River Rhine Cleaner than the Great Lakes (Despite Looser Regulation) Law and Society Review 34: 1007–54.Google Scholar
Vinke, Harriet, and Ton, Ton. 1992. The NonMobilization of Law by Asbestos Victims in The Netherlands: Social Insurance versus Tort. Based Compensation. Working paper. Amsterdam: Hugo Sinzheimer Isntitute, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, David. 1995. Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the U. S., and Japan. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Warren, Susan. 2003a. Asbestos Quagmire. Wall Street Journal, 27 January, B1.Google Scholar
Warren, Susan. 2003b. Swamped Courts Practice Plaintiff Triage. Wall Street Journal, 27 January, B1.Google Scholar
Weigend, Thomas. 1980. Continental Cures for American Ailments: European Criminal Procedure as a Model for Law Reform. In Crime and Justice, Vol. 2, ed. Norval, Morris and Michael, Tonry, 381–428. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Welles, Holly, and Kirsten, Kirsten. 2000. A Comparative Study of Solid Waste Landfill Regulation: Case Studies from the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. In Kagan and Axelrad 2000.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1997. Criminal Justice in England and America. Public Interest, Winter, 3.Google Scholar
Wokutch, Richard E. 1992. Worker Protection, Japanese Style: Occupational Safety and Health in the Auto Industry. Ithaca, N. Y.: ILR Press.Google Scholar