Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:47:43.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Men and Women of Elite Law Firms: Reevaluating Kanter's Legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Elizabeth Chambliss  and
Christopher Uggen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper tests the effects of minority partner representation on minority associate representation in a sample of 97 law firms from 1980 to 1990. We perform separate analyses for women, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asian Americans, and we consider both within-group and cross-group effects. We find that minority partner representation has a positive effect on minority associate representation, which is statistically significant in the case of women and Asian Americans. Our findings are consistent with lawyers' own accounts, which emphasize the impact of partner composition on the distribution of rewards within law firms. We also show how our findings clarify previous studies about the effects of minority representation on the distribution of organizational rewards, focusing particularly on Kanter's work and subsequent related research.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , Winter 2000 , pp. 41 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abrams, Kathryn. 1998. The New Jurisprudence of Sexual Harassment. Cornell Law Review 83:1169–230.Google Scholar
Alexander, Victoria D., and Peggy Thoits, A. 1985. Token Achievement: An Examination of Proportional Representation and Performance Outcomes. Social Forces 64:332–40.Google Scholar
Baron, James N., and Andrew Newman, E. 1990. For What It's Worth: Organizations, Occupations, and the Value of Work. American Sociological Review 55:155–75.Google Scholar
Baron, Tracy Anbinder. 1994. Keeping Women Out of the Executive Suite: The Court's Failure to Apply Title VII Scrutiny to Upper-Level Jobs. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:267–320.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 1982. Application of Title VII to Jobs in High Places. Harvard Law Review 95:947–1027.Google Scholar
Blum, L., and Smith, V. 1988. Women's Mobility in the Corporation: A Critique of the Politics of Optimism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 13:528–45.Google Scholar
Bose, Christine E., and Peter Rossi, H. 1983. Gender and Jobs: Prestige Standings of Occupations as Affected by Gender. American Sociological Review 48:316–30.Google Scholar
Chamallas, Martha. 1990. Listening to Dr. Fiske: The Easy Case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. Vermont Law Review 1589–124.Google Scholar
Chamallas, Martha 1994. Structuralist and Cultural Domination Theories Meet Title VII: Some Contemporary Influences. Michigan Law Review 92:2370–2409.Google Scholar
Chambliss, Elizabeth. 1997. Organizational Determinants of Law Firm Integration. American University Law Review 46:669–746.Google Scholar
Chambliss, Elizabeth 1998. Miles to Go: The Progress of Minorities in the Legal Profession. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Chused, Richard H. 1988. The Hiring and Retention of Minorities and Women on American Law School Faculties. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137:337–69.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A. 1985. The Lawyer Statistical Report. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Deaux, Kay, and Ullman, Joesph. 1983. Women of Steel. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dressel, Paula, Wilson Hartfield, Bernadette, and Ruby Gooley, L. 1994. The Dynamics of Homosocial Reproduction in Academic Institutions. American University Journal of Gender and the Law 2:37–62.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Anthony, Chafetz, Janet, and Dworkin, Rosalind. 1983. The Effects of Tokenism on Job Commitment Among Urban Public School Teachers: A Test of Kanter's Approach. Typescript.Google Scholar
Ely, Robin J. 1995. The Power in Demography: Women's Social Construction of Gender Identity at Work. Academy of Management Journal 38:589–634.Google Scholar
England, Paula, Farkas, George, Stanek Kilbourne, Barbara, and Dou, Thomas. 1988. Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects. American Sociological Review 53:544–58.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1981. Women in Law. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Finkel, Stephen E. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Thomas Palay, M. 1990. Why the Big Get Bigger: The Promotion-to-Partner Tournament and the Growth of Large Law Firms. Virginia Law Review 76:747–811.Google Scholar
Granfield, Robert. 1992. Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3d ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gruber, James E., and Bjorn, Lars. 1982. Blue-Collar Blues: The Sexual Harassment of Women Auto Workers. Work and Occupations 9:271–98.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, Fine, Michelle, and Balin, Jane. 1994. Becoming Gentlemen: Women's Experiences at One Ivy League Law School. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:11–110.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara A., and Morasch, Bruce. 1982. Sex-Ratios, Sex-Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work. Journal of Social Issues 1982:55–74.Google Scholar
Hammond, Theresa A. 1990. The Socio-Economic Determinants of the Demographic Composition of the Public Accounting Profession. Ph.D. diss. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Harlan, Anne, and Weiss, Carol. 1981. Job Opportunities of Black and White Working Class Women. In Women and Work, ed. Daniels, and Olvard, . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Edward Laumann, O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hodson, Randy, and England, Paula. 1986. Industrial Structure and Sex Differences in Earnings. Industrial Relations 25:16–32.Google Scholar
Izraeli, D. N. 1983. Sex Effects or Structural Effects? An Empirical Test of Kanter's Theory of Proportions. Social Forces 62:153–65.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rita Henley. 1990. Minorities Didn't Share in Firm Growth. National Law Journal, 19 February, p. 1.Google Scholar
Johnson, David R. 1994. Alternative Methods for the Quantitative Analysis of Panel Data in Family Research: Pooled Time-Series Models. Journal of Marriage and the Family 57:1065–77.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Katz, Elizabeth A. 1980. Women in Professional Training: A Study of the Influence of Mentors and Sex Ratios. Ph.D. diss. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Keane, Michael P., and David Runkle, E. 1992. On the Estimation of Panel Data Models with Serial Correlation When Instruments Are Predetermined but Not Strictly Exogenous. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:1–9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1982. Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy. Journal of Legal Education 32:591–615.Google Scholar
Lutjens, Nina V. 1988. The Effects of Gender Ratios on Research Productivity of Female Faculty in Research Universities. Ph.D. diss., University of Denver, Denver.Google Scholar
Martin, Susan. 1980. Breaking and Entering: Policewomen on Patrol. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McElrath, Karen I. 1989. Faculty Achievements: The Role of Gender in Criminology. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah J., and Barbara Reskin, F. 1992. The Double Minority: Empirical Evidence of a Double Standard in Law School Hiring of Minority Women. Southern California Law Review 65:2299–359.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah J., and Barbara Reskin, F. 1997. Sex, Race, and Credentials: The Truth About Affirmative Action in Law Faculty Hiring. Columbia Law Review 97:199–300.Google Scholar
Morris, Madeline. 1996. By Force of Arms: Rape, War, and Military Culture. Duke Law Journal 45:651–715.Google Scholar
Multicultural Women Attorneys' Network. 1994. The Burdens of Both, the Privileges of Neither: A Report of the Multicultural Women Attomy's Network. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
National Association for Law Placement. 1997. Selected Class of 1996 ERSS Findings. Washington, D.C.: National Association for Law Placement.Google Scholar
National Association for Law Placement. 1998. Press Release. February. Washington, D.C.: National Association for Law Placement.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1988. Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nieva, Veronica, and Gutek, Barbara. 1981. Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Davis-Blake, Alison. 1987. The Effect of the Proportion of Women on Salaries: The Case of College Administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly 32:1–24.Google Scholar
Plewis, Ian. 1985. Analyzing Change: Measurement and Explanation Using Longitudinal Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L. 1988. Gender Differences in Task Groups: A Status and Legitimacy Account. In Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, ed. Murray Webster, Jr, and Foschi, Martha. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rustad, Michael. 1982. Women in Khaki: The American Enlisted Woman. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sander, Richard H., and Douglass Williams, E. 1989. Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspectives on a Turbulent Market. Law and Social Inquiry 14:431–479.Google Scholar
Sayrs, Lois. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 1990. Telling Stories about Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument. Harvard Law Review 103:1749–843.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki 1998. Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment. Yale Law Journal 107:1683–805.Google Scholar
Sepal, David. 1998. For Minority Attorneys, Big Law Firms Prove Trying. Washington Post, 16 January, A1.Google Scholar
Smigel, Erwin. 1969. The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organizational Man? Blooming-ton: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
South, Scott J., Charles Bonjean, M., Markham, William T., and Order, Judy. 1982. Social Structure and Intergroup Interaction: Men and Women of the Federal Bureaucracy. American Sociological Review 47:587–99.Google Scholar
Spangler, Eve, Marsha Gordon, A., and Ronald Pipkin, M. 1978. Token Women: An Empirical Test of Kanter's Hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology 84:160–70.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Pamela S., Simons, Tal, Andrews, Alice, and Rhee, Jaehoon. 1995. The Effects of Gender Composition in Academic Departments on Faculty Tumover. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48:562–79.Google Scholar
Toren, Nina, and Kraus, Vered. 1987. The Effects of Minority Size on Women's Positions in Academia. Social Forces 65:1090–1100.Google Scholar
Touhey, John C. 1974. Effects of Additional Women Professionals on Rating of Occupational Prestige and Desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29:86.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., and O'Reilly, C. A. 1992. Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly 37:549–79.Google Scholar
Turow, Scott. 1978. One L. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, Jane. 1997. The Effect of Children on Women's Wages. American Sociological Review 62(2):209–17.Google Scholar
Ward, Jenna. 1998. Firms Struggle to Meet Minority Partner Goals. The Recorder, 12 February, p. 1.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David B., and Mitu Gulati, G. 1996. Why Are There So Few Black Lawyers in Corporate Law Firms? An Institutional Analysis. University of California Law Review 84:493–618.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice D. 1991. Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers. Gender and Society 5: 178–92.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice D., Adams, Jerome, and Howard Prince, T. 1983. The Price of a Token. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 11:325.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Lynn. 1986. Women Guarding Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Lynn 1988. Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory. Social Problem 35:64–77.Google Scholar