1 Robert H. Bork, Tradition and Morality in Constitutional Law, 10–11 (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1984).Google Scholar

2 Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (Holmes, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

3 Michael Perry, The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights 75 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982) (“Perry, Constitution”).Google Scholar

4 School District of Abington v. Schempp, 376 U.S. 203, 241 (1963).Google Scholar

5 Perry, Constitution 63; Raoul Berger, Government by Judiciary (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977) (“Berger, Government”).Google Scholar

6 Kelly, Alfred, “Clio and the Court: An Illicit Love Affair,” 1965 Sup. Ct. Rev., 119, 122.Google Scholar

7 Berger, Government; Chester J. Antieau, The Original Understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment (Tucson, Ariz.: Mid-America Press, 1981).Google Scholar

8 Michael Kent Curtis, No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1986) (“Curtis, No State shall Abridge”); Judith A. Baer, Equality under the Constitution: Reclaiming the Fourteenth Amendment (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983) (“Baer, Equality”).Google Scholar

9 See, e.g., McDowell, Curbing the Courts: The Constitution and the Limits of Judicial Power (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988), and id, Book Review, Pol. Sci. Q., Fall 1984, at 566 (reviewing J. Baer, Equality under the Constitution); Wolfe, The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-made Law (New York: Basic Books, 1986).Google Scholar

10 Disquisition on Government, in Richard K. Cralle, ed., The Works of John C. Calhoun 52 (Columbia, S.C.: A. S. Johnston, 1851).Google Scholar

11 For my recent work, see “The Fruitless Search for Original Intent,” in Michael W. McCann & Gerald L. Houseman, eds., Judging the Constitution: Critical Essays on Judicial Lawmaking 49, 54–57 (New York: Scott, Foresman, & Co., 1989); Interpreting in Ignorance: The Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment (paper delivered at the 1989 annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin, June 8–12).Google Scholar

12 332 US. 46, 105–07.Google Scholar

13 “Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights? The Original Understanding,” 2 Stan. L. Rev. 5 (1939).Google Scholar

14 Crosskey, William W., “Charles Fairman, ‘Legislative History,’ and the Constitutional Limitations on State Authority,” 22 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1 (1954); Kelly, 1965 Sup. Ct. Rev. at 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Curtis, , No State Shall Abridge 91 (emphasis in original).Google Scholar

16 Fairman, , 2 Stan L. Rev. at 5.Google Scholar

17 Berger, , Government, 145, 244, ch. 13.Google Scholar

18 See, e.g., Martin Duberman, The Uncompleted Past (New York: Random House, 1969); and id., The Antislavery Vanguard New Essays on the Abolitionists (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1965); Fawn Brodie, Thaddeus Stevens: scourge of the South (New York: W. W. Norton, 1959); David Herbert Donald, Charles Sumner and the Coming of the Civil War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960); and id., Charles Sumner and the Rights of Man (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1970).Google Scholar

19 See, e.g., Baer, Equality ch. 4.Google Scholar

20 Id.Google Scholar

21 See, e.g., The exchange between Senators Henry Wilson of Massachusetts and Edgar Cowan of Pennsylvania, Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., S. 339–44 (Jan. 22, 1866).Google Scholar

22 Hyman, A More Perfect Union: The Impact of the Civil War and Reconstruction on the Constitution (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1973).Google Scholar

23 83 U.S. 394 (1873).Google Scholar

24 S. Exec. Doc. No. 2, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. (1865).Google Scholar

25 Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 40 (Dec. 10, 1866). Nelson's references to the Globe cite only the Congress and session numbers, page, and year—not the month and day. This omission is curious, given the Harvard University Press's reputation for requiring meticulous documentation. The lack of dates also makes any collective deliberation difficult to follow.Google Scholar

26 Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2538 (May 10, 1866).Google Scholar

27 Id. at 2539–43, 2545, 3149.Google Scholar

28 Id. at 1063–64; Nelson at 139.Google Scholar

29 See Baer, Equality 90–92.Google Scholar

30 Cong. Globe, 39th Cong. 1st Sess. 505 (Jan. 30, 1866).Google Scholar

31 347 US. 483, 495 (1954).Google Scholar

32 Id. at 489.Google Scholar

33 Florida, McLaughlin V., 379 U.S. 484 (1964); Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar

34 Baer, Equality ch 5; and id., “Sexual Equality and the Burger Court,”W. Pol. Q., Dec. 1978, at 470–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971); Craig v. Boren, 429 US. 190 (1976).Google Scholar

36 Berger, , Government 245 (cited in note 5).Google Scholar

37 Baer, , Equality 253.Google Scholar

38 Curtis, , No State Shall Abridge 211 (cited in note 7).Google Scholar

39 Id.Google Scholar

40 83 U.S. 394 (1873) (upholding state power to create a monopoly).Google Scholar

41 163 U.S. 537 (1896) (upholding state law requiring racial segregation in public accommodations).Google Scholar

42 198 U.S. 45 (1905) (invalidating a general maximum-hours law).Google Scholar

43 323 U.S. 144, 152 n.4 (1938) (suggesting stricter standards of review in cases involving constitutional rights and minorities).Google Scholar

44 See, e.g., Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (1869) (upholding Congress's power to regulate the Court's jurisdiction).Google Scholar

45 94 U.S. 113, 136(1877).Google Scholar

46 109 U.S. 3 (1883) (limiting scope of fourteenth amendment to state action).Google Scholar

47 See Baer, Equality 96–97.Google Scholar

48 Robert J. Harris, The Quest for Equality 101 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

49 163 US. at 552.Google Scholar

50 Id. at 549.Google Scholar

51 410 U.S. 113 (1973) (recognizing limited right to elective abortion).Google Scholar