Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:27:54.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lochner Revisionism Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Gary D. Rowe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Section Symposium
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , Winter 1999 , pp. 221 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1998. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., and Levinson, Sanford. 1998. The Canons of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 111:963–1024.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. 1974. The Ordeal of Thomas Hutchinson. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Michael Les. 1985. Laissez-Faire and Liberty: A Re-Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism. Law and History Review 3:293–331.Google Scholar
Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1994a. Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause: Contrasting Antebellum and Postbellum Supreme Court Decision Making. Political Research Quarterly 47:857–76.Google Scholar
Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1994b. John Marshal's Federalism: A Reply to Professor Gillman. Political Research Quarterly 46:887–90.Google Scholar
Cloud, Morgan. 1996. The Fourth Amendment During the Lochner Era: Privacy, Property, and Liberty in Constitutional Theory. Stanford Law Review 48:555–631.Google Scholar
Ely, James W. Jr. 1995. The Chief Justice ship of Melville W, Fuller, 1888–1910. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Forbath, William. 1985. The Ambiguities of Free Labor: Labor and the Law in the Gilded Age. Wisconsin Law Review 1985:767–817.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. 1937. The Commerce Clause Under Marshall, Taney and Waite. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1994. Preferred Freedoms: The Progressive Expansion of State Power and the Rise of Modern Civil Liberties Jurisprudence. Political Research Quarterly 47:623–53.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1997. The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the “Living Constitution” in the Course of American State-Building. Studies in American Political Development 11:191–247.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1983. Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870–1920. In Geison, Gerald L., ed., Professions and Professional Ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1987. History and Theory. Yale Law Journal 96:1825–35.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1993. Foreword: The Constitution of Change: Fundamentality Without Fundamentalism. Harvard Law Review 107:30–117.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1991. Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Alan. 1966a. Thomas M. Cooley and the Interstate Commerce Commission: Continuity and Change in the Doctrine of Equal Rights. Political Science Quarterly 81:602–627.Google Scholar
Jones, Alan. 1966b. Thomas M. Cooley and the Michigan Supreme Court, 1865–1885. American Journal of Legal History 10:97–121.Google Scholar
Jones, Alan. 1967. Thomas M. Cooley and “Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism”: A Reconsideration. Journal of American History 53:751–71.Google Scholar
Judson, Frederick Newton. 1891. Liberty of Contract Under the Police Power: A Paper Read Before the American Bar Association at Its Fourteenth Annual Meeting in Boston. Philadelphia: Dando Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1980. Toward a Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness: The Case of Classical Legal Thought in America, 1850–1940. Research in Law and Sociology 3:3–24.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul. 1991. The Source of a Myth: Police Powers of the States and Laissez Faire Constitutionalism, 1900–1937. American Journal of Legal History 35:70–98.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul. 1995. Dawn of a Conservative Era. Journal of Supreme Court History 1995:31–46.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul. 1997. Lochner v. New York: Rehabilitated and Revised, but Still Reviled. Journal of Supreme Court History 1997:1–13.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles W. 1975. Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government-Business Relations. Journal of American History 61:970–1005.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles W. 1978. American Law and the Marketing Structure of the Large Corporation, 1875–1890. Journal of Economic History 38:631–49.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles W. 1979. The Knight Sugar Decision of 1895 and the Modernization of American Corporation Law, 1869–1903. Business History Review 53:304–42.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The “Liberty of Contract” Regime in American Law. In Freedom of Contract and the State, ed. Scheiber, Harry. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Wallace. 1956. A Missing Link in the Evolution of Due Process. Vanderbilt Law Review 10:125–37.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Wallace. 1996. John Marshall and the Sugar Trust-A Reply to Professor Gillman. Political Research Quarterly 49:405–13.Google Scholar
Moglen, Eben. 1995. Book Review: Holmes's Legacy and the New Constitutional History. Harvard Law Review 108:2027–46.Google Scholar
Paul, Arnold M. 1960. Conservative Crisis and the Rule of Law: Attitudes of the Bench and Bar, 1887–1895. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Mary Cornelia. 1976. That Commerce Shall Be Free: A New Look at the Old Laissez-Faire Court. The Supreme Court Review 1976:135–59.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1998. This Magic Moment. The New Republic, 6 April 1998, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. 1997. The Origins of Judicial Review: A Plea for New Contexts. Stanford Law Review 49:1031–64.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles A. 1964. The New Property. Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David. 1998. A. V. Dicey, Lord Watson, and the Law of the Canadian Constitution in the Late Nineteenth Century. Law and History Review 16:495–526.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1991. Lochner Era Jurisprudence and the American Constitutional Tradition. North Carolina Law Review 70:1–111.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1995. Let Us Now Praise Infamous Men. Texas Law Review 73: 661–709.Google Scholar
Twiss, Benjamin R. 1942. Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Edward G. 1997. Revisiting Substantive Due Process and Holmes's Lochner Dissent. Brooklyn Law Review 63:87–128.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin F. 1942. The Growth of American Constitutional Law. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar