Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:31:42.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Threats and the Emergence of Legal Mobilization: Conservative Mobilization in Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2020

Emilio Lehoucq
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Though the Colombian Constitutional Court has had a lead role in granting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) rights since 1998, conservatives mobilizing against LGBT rights between 1991 and 2007 were active in Congress and the streets rather than in court. After 2007, however, conservatives have maintained consistent opposition to rights claims made by LGBT people in the Constitutional Court. This article draws from fieldwork examining the significance of the Constitutional Court’s transition from granting rights to LGBT people as individuals to granting rights to LGBT people as couples and potential families to theorize conservative legal mobilization, particularly moral conservatism. To account for the rise of conservative legal mobilization against LGBT rights in Colombia in 2007, this article expands on the legal opportunity structure model. It theorizes that legal threats––that is, changes in legal rules that are perceived to increase the costs of mobilization or the expected costs of not taking action––are among the factors that lead movements to engage in legal mobilization, even if legal opportunities are not expanding.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 299 - 330
Copyright
© 2020 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is very thankful to Whitney Taylor, Sidney Tarrow, Lisa Vanhala, Bruce Wilson, Ann Orloff, Lina Malagón, Elizabeth Onasch, Savina Balasubramanian, Marie Laperrière, Mirna Nadia, Philip Ayoub, Stefan Vogler, Kumar Ramanathan, Bob Nelson, and the three Law & Social Inquiry reviewers as well as the participants in Brayden King’s Social Movements Workshop and Ann Orloff’s writing group for their useful comments on earlier drafts of this article. The author is also extremely thankful to Adriana Suárez and Camilo Mazuera for their valuable research assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Albarracín, Mauricio. 2011. “Corte Constitucional y Movimientos Sociales: El Reconocimiento Judicial de Los Derechos de Las Parejas Del Mismo Sexo en Colombia.” Sur-Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos 8, no. 14: 7–33.Google Scholar
Albarracín, Mauricio, and Lemaitre, Julieta. 2016. “La Cruzada Contra El Matrimonio Entre Personas del Mismo Sexo en Colombia.” In Sexo, Delitos y Pecados: Intersecciones Entre Religión, Género, Sexualidad y El Derecho En América Latina, edited by Sáez, Macarena and Moran, José Manuel, 92–123. Washington, DC: Center for Latin American and Latino Studies, American University.Google Scholar
Almeida, Paul. 2008. Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Alterio, Ana Micaela, and Ortega, Roberto Niembro. 2017. La Suprema Corte y El Matrimonio Igualitario en México. México City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2009. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth. 2002. “Movement-Countermovement Dynamics and the Emergence of New Institutions: The Case of ‘White Flight’ Schools in Mississippi.” Social Forces 80, no. 3: 911–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, Ricardo. 2011. Historia de Colombia Contemporánea (1920–2010). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Arias, Ricardo, and González, Fernán. 2006. “Búsqueda de La Paz y Defensa del ‘Orden Cristiano’: El Episcopado Ante Los Grandes Debates de Colombia (1998–2005).” In En La Encrucijada: Colombia en El Siglo XXI, edited by Buitrago, Francisco Leal, 173–206. Bogotá: Norma.Google Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip. 2014. “With Arms Wide Shut: Threat Perception, Norm Reception, and Mobilized Resistance to LGBT Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 13, no. 3: 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip. 2016. When States Come Out. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip, and Chetaille, Agnès. 2017. “Movement/Countermovement Interaction and Instrumental Framing in a Multi-Level World: Rooting Polish Lesbian and Gay Activism.” Social Movement Studies 19, no. 1: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip, and Page, Douglas. 2019. “When Do Opponents of Gay Rights Mobilize? Explaining Political Participation in Times of Backlash against Liberalism.” Political Research Quarterly (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Beltrán, Cely, Mauricio, William. 2013. Del Monopolio Católico a La Explosión Pentecostal: Pluralización Religiosa, Secularización y Cambio Social En Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Hunt, Scott A.. 2003. “Interactional Dynamics in Public Problems Marketplaces.” In Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by Holstein, James A. and Miller, Gale, 153–86. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2015. “Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., 3–37. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binnie, Jon. 2004. The Globalization of Sexuality. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2012. The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Daniel. 2007. “Democracia, Religión y Homosexuales.” Revista Semana, June 30. http://www.semana.com/opinion/articulo/democracia-religion-homosexuales/86929-3.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–53.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2010. “Mobilizing in the Shadow of the Law: Lesbian and Gay Rights in the Aftermath of Bowers v. Hardwick.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 31: 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, Golden, Shannon, and Liao, Wenjie. 2017. “The Catholic Church and International Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13: 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40, no. 8: 1191–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1999. “Nationalism, Political Community and the Representation of Society: Or, Why Feeling at Home Is Not a Substitute for Public Space.” European Journal of Social Theory 2, no. 2: 217–31.Google Scholar
Canaday, Margot. 2009. The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2008. “Process Tracing.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations, edited by Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, 114–27. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014. “Rights Mobilization and the Campaign to Decriminalize Homosexuality in Singapore.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 1, no. 1: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Lynette J., and Gilbert, David. 2015. “Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Minorities in Transition: LGBT Rights and Activism in Myanmar.” Human Rights Quarterly 37, no. 1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” Political Science & Politics 44, no. 4: 823–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currier, Ashley. 2012. Out in Africa: LGBT Organizing in Namibia and South Africa. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, James C. 1969. “The J-Curve of Rising and Declining Satisfactions as a Cause of Some Great Revolutions and a Contained Rebellion.” In The History of Violence in America: A Report to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, edited by Graham, Hugh and Gurr, Ted R., 690–730. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
De Fazio, Gianluca. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53, no. 1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díez, Jordi. 2015. The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Tarrow, Sidney. 2014. “Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena.” Law & Social Inquiry 39, no. 2: 449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey R. 2005. “In the Name of Equal Rights: ‘Special’ Rights and the Politics of Resentment in Post–Civil Rights America.” Law & Society Review 39, no. 4: 723–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey R.. 2008. The Cultivation of Resentment: Treaty Rights and the New Right. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2017. “Latin America’s Battle over ‘Gender Ideology.’” September 30. https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21729797-social-conservatives-are-fighting-back-against-feminism-and-gay-rights-latin-americas-battle.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bob, and McCarthy, John D.. 2004. “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 116–52. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2016. Out in the Periphery: Latin America’s Gay Rights Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, Manuel José Cepeda, and Landau, David. 2017. Colombian Constitutional Law: Leading Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans Case, Rhonda, and Givens, Terri E.. 2010. “Re-Engineering Legal Opportunity Structures in the European Union? The Starting Line Group and the Politics of the Racial Equality Directive.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no. 2: 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Mahoney, James. 2015. “The Comparative Sequential Method.” In Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis: Resilience, Diversity, and Change, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 211–39. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2015. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia-Villegas, Mauricio. 2016. “A Comparison of Sociopolitical Legal Studies.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Villegas, Mauricio. 2018. The Powers of Law: A Comparative Analysis of Sociopolitical Legal Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2014. “‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances.” Current Legal Problems 67, no. 1: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2015. “Nuevo Magistrado en La Corte Constitucional Colombiana.” Seminario de Teoría Constitucional y Filosofía Política (blog). November 5. http://seminariogargarella.blogspot.com/2015/11/la-avanzada-juridica-colombiana-festejo.html.Google Scholar
Garner, Roberta, and Zald, Mayer. 1983. “The Political Economy of Social Movement Sectors.” CRSO Working Paper 330.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2006. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan. 2009. The Limits to Union: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A., and Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Aminzade, Ronald R., 179–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graaff, David. 2012. “¿Se Volverá Conservadora La Corte Constitucional?” La Silla Vacía, August 18. http://lasillavacia.com/historia/se-volvera-conservadora-la-corte-constitucional-35546.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2015. Why Men Rebel. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, John P., Anthony, Paik, and Southworth, Ann. 2003. “Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance.” Law & Society Review 37, no. 1: 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2002. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 2: 238–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, Christopher J. 2016. “Environmental SLAPPs in the UK: Threat or Opportunity?” Environmental Politics 25, no. 2: 248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda. 2011. “Support Structures and Constitutional Change: Teles, Southworth, and the Conservative Legal Movement.” Law & Social Inquiry 36, no. 2: 516–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, Isabel Cristina, and Alfonso, Tatiana. 2008. Mujeres, Cortes y Medios: La Reforma Judicial del Aborto. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores and Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 43, no. 1: 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas M.. 2010. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leachman, Gwendolyn. 2013. “Legal Framing.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 61: 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Emilio, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2020. “The Rise of a Transnational Movement to Protect Privacy.” Mobilization 25, no. 2: 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Emilio, and Taylor, Whitney K.. 2020. “Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies?” Law & Social Inquiry 45, no. 1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaitre, Julieta. 2009. El Derecho Como Conjuro: Fetichismo Legal, Violencia y Movimientos Sociales. Bogotá: Siglo Del Hombre and Uniandes.Google Scholar
Lemaitre, Julieta. 2012. “By Reason Alone: Catholicism, Constitutions, and Sex in the Americas.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10, no. 2: 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaitre, Julieta, and Sieder, Rachel. 2017. “The Moderating Influence of International Courts on Social Movements: Evidence from the IVF Case against Costa Rica.” Health and Human Rights 19, no. 1: 149–60.Google ScholarPubMed
López, Diego E. 2004. Teoría Impura del Derecho: La Transformación de La Cultura Jurídica Latinoamericana. Bogotá: Editorial Legis.Google Scholar
López, Diego E.. 2016. Cómo Se Construyen Los Derechos: Narrativas Jurisprudenciales Sobre Orientación Sexual. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes and Editorial Legis.Google Scholar
López, Jairo Antonio. 2018. “Movilización y Contramovilización Frente a Los Derechos LGBTI. Respuestas Conservadoras al Reconocimiento de Los Derechos Humanos.” Estudios Sociológicos 36, no. 106: 161–87.Google Scholar
Maher, Thomas V. 2010. “Threat, Resistance, and Collective Action: The Cases of Sobibór, Treblinka, and Auschwitz.” American Sociological Review 75, no. 2: 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods and Research 41, no. 4: 570–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2015. “Process Tracing and Historical Explanation.” Security Studies 24, no. 2: 200–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla. 2013. Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 23–40. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 2013. “Cognitive Liberation.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by Snow, David et al., 1–2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, Dawn, and Keys, Jennifer. 2000. “Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-Vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking.” Sociological Quarterly 41, no. 1: 41–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W.. 2006. “Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W.. 2008. “Litigation and Legal Mobilization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Keleman, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A., 522–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6: 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 2006. “Resource Mobilization Theory: Vigorous or Outmoded?” In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Turner, Jonathan, 533–66. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Merhof, Katrin. 2015. “Building a Bridge between Reality and the Constitution: The Establishment and Development of the Colombian Constitutional Court.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 13, no. 3: 714–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 101, no. 6: 1628–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Aldon D. 1986. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Mousourakis, George. 2015. Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Rodrigo M. 2010. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health.” Latin American Politics and Society 52, no. 3: 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternotte, David, and Kuhar, Roman. 2017. Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. 2006. “From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women’s Movement in the 1960s.” American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 6: 1718–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penen, Lina Malagón. 2015. “Movimiento LGBT y Contra Movimiento Religioso en Colombia.” Revista de Estudos Empíricos Em Direito 2, no. 1: 162–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2007. “American Politics in the Long Run.” In The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism, edited by Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, 3–16. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva. 2007. “Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Review 42: 373–433.Google Scholar
Puyana, Germán. 2012. La Homosexualidad en El Hombre: Mitos-Historia-Enigmas-Tabúes. Bogotá: Bhandar Editores.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
El Tiempo, Redacción. 2009. “Germán Humberto Rincón Perfetti, El Hombre de Las Tutelas.” El Tiempo. November 20. http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-6640407.Google Scholar
Redacción Política. 2016. “Las Posturas Más Polémicas de Ordóñez en Su Era de Procurador.” El Espectador, September 8. https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/politica/posturas-mas-polemicas-de-ordonez-su-era-de-procurador-articulo-653620.Google Scholar
Revista Semana . 2001. “Fuera Del Clóset.” September 3. http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/fuera-del-closet/48542-3.Google Scholar
Revista Semana . 2010. “Matrimonio Gay… de Un Pelo.” June 11. http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/matrimonio-gay-pelo/124232-3.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César. 2010. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89: 1669–98.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César, and Rodríguez-Franco, Diana. 2015. Radical Deprivation on Trial. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrıguez-Raga, Juan Carlos. 2011. “Strategic Deference in the Colombian Constitutional Court, 1992–2006.” In Courts in Latin America, edited by Helmke, Gretchen and Rios-Figueroa, Julio, 81–98. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2014a. “Movement and Counter-Movement: A History of Abortion Law Reform and the Backlash in Colombia 2006–2014.” Reproductive Health Matters 22, no. 44: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruibal, Alba. 2014b. “Reform and Backlash in Mexico’s Abortion Law: Political and Legal Opportunities for Mobilization and Countermobilization.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting. Washington, DC, September 28–31.Google Scholar
Saffon, María Paula. 2006. “¿Mera Retórica?” Revista Semana, August 19. http://www.semana.com/opinion/articulo/mera-retorica/80501-3.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A.. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 2005. “After Legal Consciousness.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1: 323–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Erica. 2014. “Grievances Do Matter in Mobilization.” Theory and Society 43, no. 5: 513–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Erica S. 2016. Meaningful Resistance: Market Reforms and the Roots of Social Protest in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2007. “Government Activism and the Reorganization of American Civic Democracy.” In The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism, edited by Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, 39–67. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, Neil. 1963. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press Glencoe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 1994. New Right Discourse on Race and Sexuality: Britain, 1968–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jackie. 2004. “Transnational Processes and Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 311–35. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Somma, Nicolás M., Bargsted, Matías A., and Valenzuela, Eduardo. 2017. “Mapping Religious Change in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 59, no. 1: 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, Sarah A. 2004. “Going to the Chapel? Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the United States, 1973–2000.” Social Problems 51, no. 4: 453–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2009. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spillman, Lyn. 2020. What Is Cultural Sociology? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl Franklin. 1998. A Nation by Rights: National Cultures, Sexual Identity Politics, and the Discourse of Rights. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Mahoney, James. 2015. “Comparative-Historical Analysis in Contemporary Political Science.” In Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis: Resilience, Diversity, and Change, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 3–36. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.Google Scholar
Trujillo, Ricardo Arias. 2003. El Episcopado Colombiano: Intransigencia y Laicidad, 1850–2000. Bogotá: Centro de Estudios Socioculturales e Internacionales.Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. 2012. “LGBT Politics and American Political Development.” Annual Review of Political Science 15, no. 1: 313–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2010. Making Rights a Reality?: Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 3: 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2018. “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 3: 380–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 2004. “The Consequences of Social Movements for Each Other.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 531–51. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M. 2009. “Institutional Reform and Rights Revolutions in Latin America: The Cases of Costa Rica and Colombia.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1, no. 2: 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M., and Cordero, Juan Carlos Rodríguez. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 3: 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C. 2011. “Sustaining the State: Legal Consciousness and the Construction of Legality in Competing Abortion Activists’ Narratives.” Law & Social Inquiry 36, no. 2: 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C., and Hollis-Brusky, Amanda. 2014. “Lawyers for God and Neighbor: The Emergence of ‘Law As a Calling’ As a Mobilizing Frame for Christian Lawyers.” Law & Social Inquiry 39, no. 2: 416–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1994. “Civil Code and Civil Law: The Europeanization of Private Law within the European Community and the Re-Emergence of a European Legal Science.” Columbia Journal of European Law 1, no. 1: 63–106.Google Scholar
Zuluaga, Camila. 2012. “La Especie Humana No Puede Seguir Los Pasos de Las Bestias.” El Espectador, September 18. https://www.elespectador.com/vivir/especie-humana-no-puede-seguir-los-pasos-de-bestias-articulo-375565.Google Scholar