Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:35:39.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Ethics in the Next Generation: The Push for a New Legal Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Elizabeth Mertz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editor's Introduction
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , Spring 1998 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

References

Cross, Frank. 1997. Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review 92:251–326.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. S. 1951. Inadequate Law School Training: A Plan to Give Law Students Actual Practice. ABA Journal 37:203–5.Google Scholar
Dallimore, Suzanne. 1977. The Socratic Method: More Harm Than Good Journal of Contemporary Law 3:177–86.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry. 1992. The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession. Michigan Law Review 91:34–78.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha, Garth, Bryant, Larson, Jane, McEvoy, Arthur, Mertz, Elizabeth, Wilkins, David. Is It Time for a New Legal Realism? Presentation at 1997 Law & Society Meetings, St. Louis, Missouri, May 1997.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. 1948. The Current Crisis in Legal Education. Journal of Legal Education 1:211–20.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1998. Milgram Revisited. Researching Law 9(2): 1, 4–11.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. 1998. The Professional Responsibility of Professional Schools. President's Message. The Newsletter: A Quarterly Publication of the Association of American Law Schools 98(1):1–5.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Susan. 1995. Conflicting Responsibilities: Maneuvering Through the Minefield of Fiduciary Obligations. American Bar Foundation Working Paper #9510.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Susan. 1997. Tangled Loyalties: Teasing Out Lawyers' Conflicts of Interest. Paper presented at Symposium in Honor of Stanton Wheeler, Yale Law School, 12 April 1997.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Susan. n.d. Tangled Loyalties: Conflicts of Interest in the Private Practice of Law. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 1997. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David. 1977. Complexity and Contradiction in the Legal Order: Balbus and the Challenge of Critical Social Thought About Law. Law & Society Review 11:527–69.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1986. Doctrine in a Vacuum: Reflections on What a Law School Ought (and Ought Not) to Be. Journal of Legal Education 35:155–66.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1993. Two Paths to the Mountaintop? The Role of Legal Education in Shaping the Values of Black Corporate Lawyers. Stanford Law Review 45:1981–2026.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1995. Race, Ethics, and the First Amendment: Should a Black Lawyer Represent the Ku Klux Klan George Washington University Law Review 63: 1030–70.Google Scholar