Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:49:27.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers, Structure, and Power: A Tribute to John Heinz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Terence C. Halliday  and
Robert L. Nelson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Fall 2011 , pp. 885 - 891
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Halliday, Terence C. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. Forthcoming. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, and Whiting, Amanda. Forthcoming. Custodian of Civil Liberties and Justice in Malaysia: The Malaysian Bar and the Moderate State. In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P. 1983. “The Power of Lawyers. Georgia Law Review 17 (3): 891–911.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P. 2011. Lawyers' Professional and Political Networks Compared: Core and Periphery. Arizona Law Review 53 (2): 455–92.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. 1982 1994. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar, rev, ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Southworth, Ann, and Paik, Anthony. 2003. “Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance. Law & Society Review 37:5–50.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert, and Salisbury, Robert H. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Laumann, Edward O. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Gettleman, Robert W., and Seeskin, Morris A. 1969. Legislative Politics and the Criminal Law. Northwestern University Law Review 60 (3): 277–358.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1988. Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Paik, Anthony, Southworth, Anne, and Heinz, John P. 2007. “Lawyers of the Right: Networks and Organization. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (4): 883–917.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael J. 1988. From Patrician to Professional Elite: The Transformation of the New York City Bar Association. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar