Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:49:44.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers' Roles in Voluntary Associations: Declining Social Capital?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

John P. Heinz ,
Paul S. Schnorr ,
Edward O. Laumann  and
Robert L. Nelson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The extent and nature of lawyers' participation in civic life probably has important effects on the character of the community's activity and its outcomes. Where and how lawyers participate in voluntary associations may influence the ability of those organizations to function within the larger structure of American institutions.

This paper compares findings from two surveys of Chicago lawyers, the first conducted in 1975 and the second in 1994-95. Contrary to some expectations, the available evidence does not suggest that community activities of lawyers decreased. Moreover, lawyers' energies in 1995 appear to have been devoted more often to socially concerned organizations, those with a reformist agenda, than had been the case in 1975. The types of organizations with the greatest increase in activity were religious and civic associations. A smaller percentage of the respondents held leadership positions in 1995 than in 1975, but, because of a doubling in the number of lawyers, the best estimate is that the bar's absolute level of contribution to community leadership did not change greatly.

In both 1975 and 1995, a hierarchy of social prestige appears to have influenced the pattern of lawyers' community activities. Lawyers who had higher incomes, were middle-aged, were Protestants, and who had attended elite law schools were more likely to be active or leaders in most kinds of organizations. In ethnic and fraternal organizations, however, the elites of the profession had relatively low rates of participation, while government lawyers, solo practitioners, and graduates of less prestigious law schools predominated. Status hierarchies within the broader community—as well as social differences in taste, preference, or “culture”—clearly penetrate the bar.

Type
Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 597 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burger, Warren E. 1995. The Decline of Professionalism. Fordham Law Review 63:949–58.Google Scholar
Clark, Peter B., and James Wilson, Q. 1961. Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science 6:129–66.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. 1999. Does Voluntary Association Make Democracy Work In Smelser and Alexander 1999, 263–91.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology (Supp.) 94:S95–120.Google Scholar
Elson, Alex. 1998. The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute. Law and Social Inquiry 23:625–40.Google Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Stark, Rodney. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776–;1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe H. 1998. Caveat Lector: Conflicts of Interest of ALI Members in Drafting the Restatements. Hofstra Law Review 26:641–60.Google Scholar
Gallup, George H. Jr. 1996. Religion in America: 1996. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Religion Research Center.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1994. A Nation under Lawyers: How the Crisis in the Legal Profession Is Transforming American Society. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. 1997. The Other Civic America: Religion and Social Capital. American Prospect 32 (May-June): 68–73.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. 1989. Religious Change in America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Edward Laumann, O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York and Chicago: Russell Sage Foundation and American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Edward Laumann, O., Robert Nelson, L., and Paul Schnorr, S. 1997. The Constituencies of Elite Urban Lawyers. Law and Society Review 31:441–72.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T. 1993. The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett C. 1996. The Data Just Don't Show Erosion of America's “Social Capital. Public Perspective (Roper Center) 7 (June-July): 1–22.Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas. 1996. Kicking in Groups. Atlantic Monthly, April.Google Scholar
Linowitz, Sol M. 1994. The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J., ed. 1990. Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Daniel. 1992. The Changing Shape of American Religion. Paper presented at Indiana University—South Bend, 5 February.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 1999. Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment. American Journal of Sociology 105:88–127.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert 1995. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6:65–78.Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William H. 1994. Remarks at the dedication of the North Carolina Bar Association Center, 21 October.Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William H. 1997. Address at the dedication of the David A. Harrison III Law Grounds, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 8 November.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13:1–32.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca, Edward Laumann, O., and John Heinz, P. 1999. The Changing Value of Social Capital in an Expanding Social System. In Corporate Social Capital and Liability, ed. Leenders, Roger and Gabbay, Shad. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Schiltz, Patrick J. 1999. On Being a Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, Unethical Profession. Vanderbilt Law Review 52:871–951.Google Scholar
Shapo, Marshall. 1998. Private Organization, Public Responsibilities. Law and Social Inquiry 23:651–55.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J., and Jeffrey Alexander, C., eds. 1999. Diversity and Its Discontents: Cultural Conflict and Common Ground in Contemporary American Society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David H. 1983. Synanthrometrics: On Progress in the Development of a General Theory of Voluntary Action and Citizen Participation. In International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research, ed. David Smith, H. et al. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Smith, David H. 1994. Determinants of Voluntary Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23:243–63.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1987. Correcting Church Membership Rates: 1971 and 1980. Review of Religious Research 29:69–77.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, de, Alexis, . 1945. Democracy in America, trans. Reeve, Henry; ed. Bowen, Francis and Bradley, Phillips. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Trillin, Calvin. 1978. Alice, Let's Eat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Union League Club. 1998. State of the Union: Annual Report of the Union League Club. Chicago: Union League Club.Google Scholar
Union League Club. 1999. State of the Union: Annual Report of the Union League Club. Chicago: Union League Club.Google Scholar
Warner, R. Stephen. 1999. Changes in the Civic Role of Religion. In Smelser and Alexander 1999, 229–;43.Google Scholar
Wilson, John, and Musick, Marc. 1997. Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work. American Sociological Review 62:694–713.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Charles W. 1998. Bismarck's Sausages and the ALI's Restatements. Hofstra Law Review 26:817–34.Google Scholar
Yanas, John J. 1990. President's Message. New York State Bar Journal, May, 3.Google Scholar