Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:54:02.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Review products

Christopher Tomlins, In the Matter of Nat Turner. A Speculative History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2021

Simon Middleton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on Christopher Tomlins’s In the Matter of Nat Turner
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 890 - 893
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody/Tomlins 1995 debate on review in International Labor and Working Class History and responses to Law, Labor, and Ideology. https://networks.h-net.org/node/7753/pages/77836/brodytomlin-debate-law-labor-and-ideology.Google Scholar
Dubofsky, Melvyn. Review of The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960, by Christopher L. Tomlins. Law and History Review 4, no. 2 (1986): 470–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdren, Nate, and Eric, Tucker. “Marxist Theories of Law Past and Present: A Meditation Occasioned by the 25th Anniversary of Law, Labor, and Ideology.” Law & Social Inquiry 45, no. 4 (2020): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Simon, and James, Shaw, eds. Market Ethics and Practices, c.1300–1850. London: Routledge, 2018. In this volume, Tomlins, Christopher L., “Demonic Ambiguities: Enchantment and Disenchantment in Nat Turner’s Virginia,” 87–106.Google Scholar
Middleton, Simon, and Smith, Billy G., eds. Class Matters: Early North America and the Atlantic World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. In this volume, Tomlins, Christopher L., “Constellations of Class in North America and the Atlantic World,” 213–33, 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. “The Many Legalities of Early America.” Uncommon Sense, Newsletter of the Institute of Early American History & Culture, Summer, 1994.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. “Subordination, Authority, Law: Subjects in Labor History.” International Labor and Working-Class History 47 (1995a), 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. “How Who Rides Whom. Recent ‘New’ Histories of American Labor Law and What They May Signify.” Social History 20, no. 1 (Jan. 1995b), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. “Why Wait for Industrialism? Work, Legal Culture, and the Example of Early America — an Historiographical Argument.” Labor History 40, no. 1 (1999), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing English America,1580–1865. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L., and Mann, Bruce H., eds. The Many Legalities of Early America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Vinel, Jean-Christian. “Christopher Tomlins’ The State and the Unions Today: What the Critical Synthesis Can Teach Us Now that the Unions Have Gone.” Labor History 54, no. 2 (2013): 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar