Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:23:41.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium in their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barclay, Scott. 1999. An Appealing Act: Why People Appeal in Civil Cases. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Balti more, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara. 1977. The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Howard, S. Erlanger, and John, John. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law and Society Review 27: 497534.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1992. Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review 26: 731–49.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Richard, L. Abel, and Austin, Austin. 198081. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law and Society Review 15: 631–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William, Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrick. 1993. Abigail Bailey's Coverture: Law in a Married Woman's Consciousness. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Austin, Satat and Thomas, R. Kearns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1969. Debtors in Court. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and Miltary. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., Neil, Neil, and Bogart, W. A. 1991. To Confront or Not to Confront: Measuring Claiming Rates in Discrimination Grievances. Law and Society Review 25: 875–87.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1991a. Justice, Democracy, Litigation, and Political Participation. Social Science Quarterly 72: 464–77.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1991b. Participation Through Mobilization of the Law: Institutions Providing Indigents With Access to the Civil Courts. Polity 23: 423–42.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2001. Idle Rights: Employees' Construction of Sexual Harassment Procedures. Paper presented at American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, and Tracey, March. 1995. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A Socio-Political Assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 15: 207–36.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1995. Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law. Law and Society Review 29: 1126.Google Scholar
Mezey, Naomi. 2001. Out of the Ordinary: Law, Power, Culture, and the Commonplace. Law & Social Inquiry 26: 145–67.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard E., and Austin, Austin. 198081. Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture. Law and Society Review 15: 525–66.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review 34: 1055–90.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M. 1984. Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. “… The Law is All Over:” Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 343–79.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and William, L. F. Felstiner. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas, R. Kearns. 1995. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Austin, Sarat and Thomas, R. Kearns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98: 129.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 1996. Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
White, Lucie E. 1990. Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G. Buffalo Lau Review 38: 158.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances K. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77: 690703.Google Scholar