Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:39:21.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Honoring James Heckman's Contributions to Economics: Identification, Heterogeneity, and Economic Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Steven D. Levitt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given James Heckman's enormous contributions to the field of economics and the social sciences more generally, the question regarding the Nobel prize was not “if,” but “when.” The choice of Heckman as the 2000 Nobel laureate (joint with Daniel McFadden, another deserving winner) has been warmly received throughout the profession. Heckman and McFadden were both pioneers whose work helped to create modern empirical economics.

Type
Essays in Honor of James Heckman, 2000 Nobel Laureate
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donohue, John, and Heckman., James J. 1991. Continuous vs. Episodic Change: The Impact of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks. Journal of Economic Literature 29 (4): 1603–43.Google Scholar
Ekeland, Ivar, Heckman, James J., and Nesheim, Lars. 2001. Identifying Preferences and Technolog. In the Hedonic Model Using All of the Economic Implications of the Model. Manuscript. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Flinn, Christopher, and Heckman, James J. 1982. New Methods for Analyzing Structural Models of Labor Force Dynamics. Journal of Econometrics 18 (Jan.): 115–68.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1978. Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equations System. Econometrica 46 (4): 931–59.Google Scholar
Heckman, James. J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47 (Feb.): 153–61.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1997. Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions in One Widely Used Estimator. Journal of Human Resources 32 (3): 441–61.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2000. Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis: A 20th Century Retrospective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 45–97.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2001. Microdata, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy. Journal of Political Economy 109 (4): 673–748.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Honore, Bo. 1990. The Empirical Content of the Roy Model. Econometrica 58 (5): 1121–49.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Hotz, Joe. 1989. Choosing among Alternative Methods of Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Training. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 862–74.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., LaLonde, Robert, and Smith, Jeffrey. 1999. The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs. In Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. Ashenfelter, Orley and Card, David, ch. 31. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., Lochner, Lance, and Taber, Christopher. 1998. General Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tuition Policy. American Economic Review 88 (2): 381–86.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Payner, B. 1989. Determining the Impact of Federal Antidiscrimination Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks: A Study of South Carolina. American Economic Review 79 (1): 138–77.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Robb, Richard. 1985. Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions: An Overview. Journal of Econometrics 30 (1-2): 239–67.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Siegelman, Peter. 1993. The Urban Institute Audit Studies: Their Methods and Findings. In Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, ed. Fix, Michael and Struyk, Raymond. Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, James, and Singer, Burton. 1984. A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumption in Econometric Models for Duration Data. Econometrica 54 (Mar.): 271–320.Google Scholar
Heckman, James, and Smith, Jeffrey. 1995. Evaluating the Case for Randomized Social Experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (Spring): 85–100.Google Scholar
Heckman, James, and Vytlacil, Edward. 1999. Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects. Proceedings: National Academy of Sciences 96: 4730–34.Google Scholar
Heckman, James, and Vytlacil, Edward. Forthcoming 2001. Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation. Econometrica.Google Scholar