Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:18:04.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Halfway Homeowners: Eviction and Forced Relocation in a Florida Manufactured Home Park

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

The last four decades of US housing policy have seen a shift from the federal allocation of affordable housing as a public good to the neoliberal model of private and for‐profit provision of affordable housing. This shift warrants a study of the link between the interests that now shape low‐income housing markets and the stability of the housing they provide. Nowhere are the effects of this shift more evident than in the homes of the 20 million Americans living in manufactured housing, which is installed largely on the private lands of for‐profit developers who can close mobile home parks and force residents to move themselves and their homes with as little as 30 days' notice. This ethnography of mass eviction in a Florida mobile home park examines state regulations intended to protect residents of closing parks and analyzes how private interests shape the implementation of these policies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Apgar, William, Calder, Allegra, Collins, Michael, and Duda, Mark 2002. An Examination of Manufactured Housing as a Community and Asset Building Strategy. Washington, DC: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation in collaboration with the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Consumer's Union. 2001. Manufactured Homeowners Who Rent Lots Lack Security of Basic Tenants Rights. Austin, TX: Consumer Reports.Google Scholar
Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED). 2009. Advocating at the Local Level. Washington, DC: CFED.Google Scholar
Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED). 2010a. Promoting Resident Ownership of Communities. Washington, DC: CFED.Google Scholar
Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED). 2010b. Protecting Fundamental Freedoms in Communities. Washington, DC: CFED.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Casey J., Koebel, C. Theodore, Cavell, Marilyn, Hullibarger, Steve, Hattis, David B., and Weissman, Howard 2011. Regulatory Barriers to Manufactured Housing Placement in Urban Communities. Blacksburg, VA: Center for Housing Research, Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
Duany, Andres, Plater‐Zyberk, Elizabeth, and Alminana, Robert 2003. The New Civic Art: Elements of Town Planning. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Florida, R. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Florida State Senate, Committee on Community Affairs. 2006. Interim Project Report 2007–106. Tallahassee: Florida State Senate.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Werner Z., and Rufolo, Anthony M. 1999. The Regulation of Immobile Housing Assets Under Divided Asset Ownership. International Review of Land and Economics 19 (3): 383397.Google Scholar
Housing Assistance Council (HAC). 2011. Rural Housing Research Note. Preserving Affordable Manufactured Home Communities in Rural America: A Case Study. Washington, DC: Housing Assistance Council.Google Scholar
Klinenberg, Eric. 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Logan, John R., and Molotch, Harvey L. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manufactured Homeowners Association of America (MHAA). 2011. Around the Nation. http://www.allparksallianceforchange.org/?q=book/export/html (accessed January 8, 2011).Google Scholar
Meeks, Carol 1998. Manufactured Home Life: Existing Housing Stock Through 1997. Arlington, VA: Manufactured Housing Institute.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2007. Manufactured Housing: Not What You Think. http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/EconomicDevelopmentTradeCulturalAffairs/ManufacturedHousingNotWhatYouThink/tabid/12742/Default.aspx#charts (accessed July 7, 2011).Google Scholar
Rohe, William M., and Stegman, Michael A. 1996. The Impacts of Home Ownership on the Self‐Esteem, Perceived Control and Life Satisfaction of Low Income People. Journal of the American Planning Association 60:3781.Google Scholar
Rohe, William M., van Zandt, Shannon, and McCarthy, George 2001. The Social Benefits and Cost of Home Ownership: A Critical Assessment of Research. Working Paper LIHO‐01.12. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., and Weber, Eleanor 1996. The Social Benefits of Home Ownership: Empirical Evidence from National Surveys. Housing Policy Debate 7:181.Google Scholar
Tremoulet, Andrée 2010. Policy Responses to the Closure of Manufactured Home Parks in Oregon. PhD diss., Department of Urban Studies, Portland State University.Google Scholar
US Commerce Department. 2010. Cost and Size Comparison for Manufactured and Site Built Homes: 1995–2010. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/const/mhs/supplemental.html (accessed March 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Wallis, Allan 1991. Wheel Estate: The Rise and Decline of Mobile Homes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Florida Mobile Home Act, Fla. Stat. Title XL, Chapter 723 (2001).Google Scholar
Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. 24 CFR § 3280 (1976).Google Scholar
Florida Mobile Home Act, Fla. Stat. Title XL, Chapter 723 (2001).Google Scholar
Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. 24 CFR § 3280 (1976).Google Scholar