Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:35:20.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Fundamental Law to Constitutional Politics– And Back

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Howard Gillman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , Winter 1998 , pp. 185 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We, the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Adamany, David. 1973. Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court. Wisconsin Law Review 1973:790–846.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 1987. Of Sovereignty and Federalism. Yale Law Journal 96:1425–1520.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 1994. The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V. Columbia Law Review 94:457–508.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1996. The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Susan R. 1992. Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Power Debates. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Burt, Robert A. 1992. The Constitution in Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. The Supreme Court and National Policymaking. American Political Science Review 70:50–63.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1983. The Supreme Court 1982 Term–Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review 97:4–68.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991a. Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions. Yale Law Journal 101:331–417.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991b. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game. California Law Review 79:613–84.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis, and Devins, Neal. 1992. Political Dynamics of Constitutional Law. St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 1993. Dialogue and Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review 91577–682.Google Scholar
Gates, John. 1992. The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment: A Macro- and Micro-level Perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1994. Preferred Freedoms: The Progressive Expansion of State Power and the Rise of Modern Civil Liberties Jurisprudence. Political Research Quarterly 47:623–53.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1997. The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the “Living Constitution” in the Course of American State-Building. Studies in American Political Development 11:191–247.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman. 1997. State Resistance to Authority in Federal Unions: The Early United States (1790–1860) and the European Community (1958–1994). Studies in American Political Development 11:149–89.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1993. The Non-Majoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7:35–73.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1995. The Passive-Aggressive Virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the Problematic Establishment of Judicial Power. Constitutional Commentary 12:67–92.Google Scholar
Harris, William F. II 1993. The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Morton J. 1993. Foreword: The Constitution of Change: Legal Fundamentality without Fundamentalism. Harvard Law Review 107:30–117.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 1993. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1994. Has Brown Changed Race Relations? The Backlash Thesis. Journal of American History 81:81–118.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Epstein, Lee. 1996. On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy. Law & Society Review 30:237–120.Google Scholar
Kyvig, David E. 1996. Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U.S. Constitution, 17761995. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1993. Fidelity in Translation. Texas Law Review 71:1165–1268.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1995. Understanding Changed Readings: Fidelity and Theory. Stanford Law Review 47:395–472.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, ed. 1995. Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1985. The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, N.Y. and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1994. The American Supreme Court. 2d ed., rev. Sanford Levinson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Wayne D. 1996. constitutional Rights and the Powers of the People. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen R., and Nickel, James W.. 1977. Does the Constitution Mean What It Always Meant Columbia Law Review 77:1029–62.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1995. The Primacy of Labor in American Constitutional Development. American Political Science Review 89:377–88.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael, and Tushnet, Mark V.. 1996. Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1964. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court: New Approaches to Political Jurisprudence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1984. Recent Developments in Political Jurisprudence. Western Political Quarterly 36:541–48.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. 1964. Reprint, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1988. Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law. American Political Science Review 82:239–108.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Harry. 1965. Congressional Response to Supreme Court Rulings: The Interaction of Law and Politics. Journal of Public Law 14:377–95.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1996. The Political Constitution of Federalism in Antebellum America: The Nullification Debate as an Illustration of Informal Mechanisms of Constitutional Change. Publius 26:1–24.Google Scholar