Fairness at Trial: The Impact of Procedural Justice and Other Experiential Factors on Criminal Defendants’ Perceptions of Court Legitimacy in Poland

Stanislaw Burdziej; Keith Guzik; Bartosz Pilitowski

doi:10.1111/lsi.12358

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Chang, Leanne and Zhang, Weiyu 2021. Procedural Justice in Online Deliberation: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, Vol. 17, Issue. 1,

Dudek, Michał and Stępień, Mateusz 2021. Courtroom Power Distance Dynamics. Vol. 3, Issue. , p. 1.

Burdziej, Stanisław Guzik, Keith and Pilitowski, Bartosz 2022. How Civility Matters in Civil Matters: Procedural Justice and Court Legitimacy in the Midst of a Legitimacy Crisis. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 558.

Prusiński, Tomasz 2023. The structure of the legitimacy of health care institutions. The Polish adaptation of the Legitimacy Questionnaire and its psychometric properties. Przegląd Psychologiczny, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 129.

Lee, Man Yee Karen and Lo, Yan Lam 2023. Political Orientation and Trust in the Courts. Asian Survey, Vol. 63, Issue. 3, p. 434.

Prusiński, Tomasz 2023. When does doctor’s recommendation become patient’s resolution? The regulatory potential of procedural justice in the context of compliance with medical advice and the treatment process. Frontiers in Medicine, Vol. 10, Issue. ,

Rengifo, Andres F. Avila, Lorena and Ibañez, David 2023. Criminal defense work in a sample of arrest hearings in three states of Mexico: the micro-dynamics of case-level engagement, influence, and strategy. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 79, Issue. 5, p. 555.

Prusiński, Tomasz 2023. Struktura legitymizacji instytucji ochrony zdrowia. Adaptacja i właściwości psychometryczne Kwestionariusza legitymizacji (LQ). Przegląd Psychologiczny, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 43.

Główczewski, Michał and Burdziej, Stanisław 2023. (In)justice in academia: procedural fairness, students’ academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities. Higher Education, Vol. 86, Issue. 1, p. 163.

van Hall, Matthias Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. Van der Laan, Peter H. and Nieuwbeerta, Paul 2023. Procedural Justice, Perceived Legitimacy, and Reoffending Behavior: In Police and Court Setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 50, Issue. 12, p. 1874.

Pilitowski, Bartosz 2024. Typologia przeszkód w realizacji prawa do sądu. Zastosowanie socjologicznej koncepcji praw człowieka Adama Podgóreckiego. Zeszyty Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II, Vol. 67, Issue. 3,

Paik, Leslie and Packard, Chiara 2024. Broadening the Lens of Procedural Justice Beyond the Courtroom: A Case Study of Legal Financial Obligations in the Juvenile Court. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 679.

Asif, Muhammad Fazal, Hina and Akbar, Muhammad Siddique 2024. Legitimacy of the courts: evidence from a survey in Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, p. 1.

Główczewski, Michał Burdziej, Stanisław and Wójcik, Adrian Dominik 2025. The Effect of Organisational Justice, Academic Identification and Legitimacy of Academic Authorities on Student Loyalty. Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 79, Issue. 1,

Lemire-Garlic, Nicole and Dunbar, Adam 2025. Public perceptions of remote courts and equal access: who prefers remote video proceedings and why?. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 94.

Article contents

Fairness at Trial: The Impact of Procedural Justice and Other Experiential Factors on Criminal Defendants’ Perceptions of Court Legitimacy in Poland

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests