Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:35:45.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Faction of One: Revisiting Madison's Notes on the Constitutional Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Gerard N. Magliocca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay on Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention, Mary Bilder's revisionist account (2016) of James Madison's Notes on the Constitutional Convention argues that her central thesis, which is that Madison substantially revised the Notes long after the Convention adjourned, is groundbreaking but will have no effect on constitutional law. Madison's Hand is groundbreaking because the book yields many powerful insights into the deliberations of the Convention and into the evolution of Madison's thought. Nevertheless, constitutional practice in the Supreme Court and among elite lawyers is so divorced from the Notes that even a dramatic shift in their interpretation will not disturb the evolution of judicial doctrine applying the text written in 1787.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Winter 2018 , pp. 267 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Balkin, Jack. 2011. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barbash, Fred. 2015. How James Madison Doctored the Story of the Constitutional Convention. Washington Post, November 18.Google Scholar
Bilder, Mary Sarah. 2015. Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbit, Phillip. 1991. Constitutional Interpretation. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1971. Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems. Indiana Law Journal 47:1–35.Google Scholar
Chernow, Ron. 2004. Alexander Hamilton. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Chernow, Ron. 2010. Washington: A Life. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Colby, Thomas B., and Smith, Peter J. 2009. Living Originalism. Duke Law Journal 59:239–307.Google Scholar
Cooke, Jacob E, ed. 1961. The Federalist. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Crosskey, William Winslow. 1953. Politics and the Constitution in the History of the United States (2 vols.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2010. Jurisdiction‐Stripping Reconsidered. Virginia Law Review 96:1043–1135.Google Scholar
Farrand, Max, ed. 1911. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Benjamin B. 1914. The Journal of the Joint Committee of Fifteen on Reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kesavan, Vasan, and Stokes Paulson, Michael. 2003. The Interpretive Force of the Constitution's Secret Drafting History. Georgetown Law Journal 91:1113–1214.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael. 2016. The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Magliocca, Gerard N. 2007. Andrew Jackson and the Constitution: The Rise and Fall of Generational Regimes. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Pauline. 2010. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Manuel‐Miranda, Lin, and McCarter, Jeremy. 2016. Hamilton: The Revolution. New York: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., and Rappaport, Michael B. 2009. Original Methods Originalism: A New Theory of Interpretation and the Case Against Construction. Northwestern University Law Review 103:751–802.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack. 2016. A Biography of Madison's Notes of Debates: Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention. Constitutional Commentary 31:317–48.Google Scholar
Shesol, Jeff. 2010. Franklin Roosevelt vs. The Supreme Court. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sirico, Louis J. Jr. 2011. The Supreme Court and the Constitutional Convention. Journal of Law and Politics 27:63–98.Google Scholar
Smith, Jean Edward. 1996. John Marshall: Definer of a Nation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Stewart, David O. 2015. Madison's Gift: Five Partnerships That Built America. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
Strauss, David. A. 2015. Foreword: Does the Constitution Mean What It Says? Harvard Law Review 129:1–61.Google Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus. 1938. Use By the United States Supreme Court of Extrinsic Aids in Constitutional Construction: Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional and Ratifying Conventions. California Law Review 27:437–54.Google Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus. 1951. The Antislavery Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
Carpenter v. Pennsylvania, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 456 (1854).Google Scholar
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).Google Scholar
Home Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934).Google Scholar
Knox v. Lee, 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1871).Google Scholar
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988).Google Scholar
Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).Google Scholar
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
Carpenter v. Pennsylvania, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 456 (1854).Google Scholar
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).Google Scholar
Home Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934).Google Scholar
Knox v. Lee, 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1871).Google Scholar
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988).Google Scholar
Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).Google Scholar
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).Google Scholar