No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dynamic and Constrained: Using the Judiciary to Pursue Social Justice in India
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- International Book Essays
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Bar Foundation
References
REFERENCES
Austin, Granville. 1966. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 1985. Courage Craft and Contention: The Indian Supreme Court in the Eighties. Bombay: N. M. Tripathi.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. “Federalist no. 78.” In The Federalist, edited by George W. Carey and James McClellan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Iyer, V. R. Krishna. 2005. “Towards an Indian Jurisprudence of Social Action and Public Interest Litigation: Towards an Indian Jurisprudence of Social Action and Public Interest Litigation.” In Sociology of Law, edited by Deva, Indra. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashyup, Subhash C., ed. 1982. Jawaharlal Nehru and the Constitution. New Delhi: Metropolitan Book.Google Scholar
Robinson, Nick. 2009. “Expanding Judiciaries: India and the Rise of the Good Governance Court.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8: 8–78.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N., Sudhir, Krishnaswamy, and Shishir, Bail. 2019. A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Morton. 1978. The Philosophy of the American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar