Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:38:56.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does the Chicago School Need to Expand Its Curriculum?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahonen, Perti. 1995. Regulating, Deregulating and Reregulating Universities: Law and Economics of Institutional and Contractual Design. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Braun, Christopher Kent. 1995. A Semiotics of Economics. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Brietzke, Paul H, 1995. Law, Democratization and Markets. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1991. The Pointlessness of Pareto: Carrying Coase Further. Yale Law Journal 100:1211–37.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. 1995. Environmental Protection and Economic Growth: Lessons from Socialist Europe. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Crespi, Gregory. 1991. The Mid-Life Crisis of the Law and Economics Movement: Confronting the Problems of Nonfalsifiability and Normative Bias. Notre Dame Law Review 67:231–52.Google Scholar
Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth. 1990. An Economic Analysis of the Criminal Law as a Preference Shaping Policy. Duke Law Journal 1990:138.Google Scholar
Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth. 1995. Legal Prohibitions as More than Prices: The Economic Analysis of Preference-Shaping Policies in the Law. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L. 1994. Class, Personality, Contract, and Unconscionability. William & Mary Law Review 35:445501.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L. 1995. Class, Entitlement and Contract. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1981. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique. Stanford Law Review 33:387445.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism. Virginia Law Review 60:451482.Google Scholar
Lewin, Jeff L. 1995. “Toward a New Ecological Law and Economics. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Malloy, Robin Paul 1995. A New Law and Economics. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Malloy, Robin Paul, and Braun, Christopher K., eds. 1995. Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
Mercuro, Nicholas, and Medema, Steven. 1995. Schools of Thought in Law and Economics: A Kuhnian Competition. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Lawrence E. 1995. Corporate Nature versus Human Nature? In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Paul, Ellen Frankel. 1995. Freedom of Association: A ‘Fundamental Right’ at Risk. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1992. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey Evans. 1995. Loss Aversion and Involuntary Transfer of Title. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1986. Legal Interference with Private Preferences. University of Chicago Law Review 53:1129–74.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, Slovic, Paul, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1990. The Causes of Preference Reversal. American Economic Review 80:204–17.Google Scholar
Ulen, Thomas. 1989. Cognitive Imperfections and the Economic Analysis of Law. Ham' line Law Journal 12:385410.Google Scholar
Ulen, Thomas. 1995. Rational Victims-Rational Injurers: Cognition and the Economic Analysis of Tort Law. In Malloy and Braun 1995.Google Scholar