Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:27:05.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a Public Interest Response to State-Orchestrated Corruption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2021

John Gillespie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As conventionally understood, anti-corruption programs rely on legal rules to define and control the abuse of official power for private gain. This study explores the limits to law-based standards of corruption where state officials obscure bribery and the abuse of power beneath a veneer of legality. Drawing on an empirical study of two public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Vietnam, it asks whether the failure of anti-corruption laws to curb malfeasance in PPPs is attributable to insufficient enforcement, to targeting the wrong behavior, or to both of these issues. It argues that if anti-corruption laws are blind to the opportunistic manipulation of laws in PPPs, then we must consider other ways of conceptualizing and controlling corruption. This argument links the way in which corruption is conceptualized to the efficacy of policy instruments used to curb corruption in PPPs. In particular, it examines whether public interest corruption provides a framework that makes malfeasance in PPPs visible and thus offers a mechanism for holding officials accountable. This study concludes that public interest corruption broadens the analysis of corruption in PPPs from transgressions of legal boundaries to an examination of public inclusion and exclusion from decision making.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 25 - 54
Copyright
© 2021 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was funded by a research grant from the United Nations Development Program, Vietnam. Thank you to Nguyen Van Thang and the research team from the National Economic University in Hanoi and also to the interviewees who gave their time to collaborate on this project. The author is also grateful for the anonymous reviewers’ and the journal editor’s insightful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Ang, Yuen Yuen. 2016. “Beyond Weber: Conceptualizing an Alternative Ideal Type of Bureaucracy in Developing Contexts.” Regulation & Governance 11, no. 3: 282–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2012. Assessment of Public–Private Partnerships in Viet Nam Constraints and Opportunities. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Rowland, and John, Flint. 2011. “Snowball Sampling.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, edited by Lewis-Beck, Michael, Bryman, Alan, and Liao, Tim Futing, 1044–45. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Benedikter, Simon, and Loan, Nguyen. 2018. “Obsessive Planning in Transitional Vietnam: Understanding Rampant State Planning and Prospects of Reform.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 13, no. 4: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birney, Mayling. 2017. “Beyond Performance Legitimacy: Procedural Legitimacy and Discontent in China.” LSE Working Paper Series no. 17-189.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry. 2007. Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2006. “Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies.” World Development 34: 884–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Cheng, and Michael, Hubbard. 2012. “Power Relations and Risk Allocation in the Governance of Public Private Partnerships: A Case Study from China.” Policy and Society 31, no. 1: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, Gjalt. 2007. “Causes of Corruption: Towards a Contextual Theory of Corruption.” Public Administration Quarterly 69, no. 3: 39–86.Google Scholar
De Jong, Gjalt, Anh Tu, Phan, and van Ees, Hans. 2015. “The Impact of Personal Relationships on Bribery Incidence in Transition Economies.” European Management Review 12: 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan Trong Truyen. 1996. “An Overview on Public Administration Reform in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.” In International Colloquium on Public Administration Reform, 122–28. Hanoi: UNDP.Google Scholar
Dukalskis, Alexander, and Johannes, Gerschewski. 2017. “What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation.” Contemporary Politics 23, no. 3: 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukalskis, Alexander, and Johannes, Gerschewski. 2018. “Adapting or Freezing? Ideological Reactions of Communist Regimes to a Post-Communist World.” Government and Opposition 55, no. 3: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.40.Google Scholar
Dunn, Jennifer, and Maurice, Schweitzer. 2005. “Feeling and Believing: The Influence of Emotion on Trust.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 736–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endres, Kirsten. 2014. “Making Law: Small-Scale Trade and Corrupt Exceptions at the Vietnam–China Border.” American Anthropologist 116, no. 3: 611–25.Google Scholar
Endres, Kirsten. 2018. “Making the Marketplace: Trader, Cadres, and Bureaucratic Document in Lao Cai City.” In Traders in Motion, edited by Kirsten, W. Endres and Leshkowich, Ann Marie, 27–40. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fforde, Adam, and Lada, Homutova. 2017. “Political Authority in Vietnam: Is the Vietnamese Communist Party a Paper Leviathan?” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 36, no. 3: 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jody. 2000. “Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law.” Administrative Law Review 52, no. 3: 813–58.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing, Gillespie, John, Nicholson, Penelope and Partlett, William, eds. 2018. Socialist Law in Socialist East Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAN Integrity. 2017. “Vietnam Corruption Report.” Business Anti-Corruption Portal. https://www.business-anti-corruption.com/country-profiles/vietnam/.Google Scholar
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2018. “Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?” Perspectives on Politics 6, no. 3: 652–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2017. “Transforming Land-Taking Disputes in Socialist Asia: Engaging an Authoritarian State. Law & Policy 39, no. 3: 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John, and Hung, Quang Nguyen. 2019. “Between Authoritarian Governance and Urban Citizenship: Tree-Felling Protests in Hanoi.” Urban Studies 56, no. 5: 977–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Ting, and Ian, Scott, eds. 2017. Routledge Handbook of Corruption in Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 2007. “The Social Construction of Corruption.” In On Capitalism, edited by Nee, Victor and Swedberg, Richard, 152–72. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuận, Hà. 2018. “Điện Biên: Tăng Cường Bảo vệ Môi Trường Trong Khai Thác Khoáng Sản” [Dien Bien: Enhancing environmental protection in mineral exploitation]. Bao Tai Nguyen Moi Truong Online. https://baotainguyenmoitruong.vn/moi-truong/dien-bien-tang-cuong-bao-ve-moi-truong-trong-khai-thac-khoang-san-1258445.html.Google Scholar
Hayllar, Mark, and Roger, Wettenhall. 2010. “Public-Private Partnerships: Promises, Politics and Pitfalls.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 69, no. 1S: 1–7.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold. 1970. “Introduction.” In Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, edited by Heidenheimer, Arnold, 2–128. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Hiller, Petra. 2010. “Understanding Corruption: How Systems Theory Can Help.” In The Good Cause: Theoretical Perspectives on Corruption, edited by de Graaf, Gjalt, von Maravic, Patrick, and Wagenaar, Pieter, 64–82. Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
Hoang, Kimberly Kay. 2018. “Risky Investments: How Local and Foreign Investors Finesse Corruption-Rife Emerging Markets.” American Sociological Review 83, no. 4: 657–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Jane. 2016. Public Relations and the Public Interest. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Michael. 1996. “The Search for Definitions: The Vitality of Politics and the Issue of Corruption.” International Social Science Journal 149: 321–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2019. Speaking Out in Vietnam: Public Political Criticism in a Communist Party–Ruled Nation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hun. 2017. “Capturing World-Class Urbanism through Modal Governance in Saigon.” Positions 25, no. 4: 669–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, Robert. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurer, Oskar. 2005. “‘Corruption’: An Alternative Approach to Its Definition and Measurement.” Political Studies 53: 222–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lê, Hiệp. 2019. “Tổng Kiểm toán Nhà nước: Quản lý đất đai tiềm ẩn lớn thất thoất, tham nhũng” [State Auditor General: Managing a large potential for losses and corruption in land]. Thanh Niên. https://thanhnien.vn/thoi-su/tong-kiem-toan-nha-nuoc-quan-ly-dat-dai-tiem-an-lon-that-thoat-tham-nhung-1083741.html.Google Scholar
Le Hong Hiep. 2012. “Performance-Based Legitimacy: The Case of the Communist Party of Vietnam and ‘Doi Môi.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 4, no. 2: 145–72.Google Scholar
Le Hong Hiep 2019. “The Impact of Vietnam’s Anti-corruption Campaign on the Real Estate Sector.” ISEAS, Yusof Ishak Institute 46 (May): 1–7.Google Scholar
Lebbe, Danielle, and Clement, Musil. 2013. “Peri-Urban Land Redevelopment in Vietnam under Market Socialism.” Urban Studies 51, no. 6: 1146–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey, and Tyler, Tom. 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy. Measuring Legitimacy Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53, no. 3: 354–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeil, Ian R. 2000. “Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries.” North Western University Law Review 94: 877–908.Google Scholar
Malarney, Shaun Kingsley. 1997. “Culture, Virtue, and Political Transformation in Contemporary Northern Viet Nam.” Journal of Asian Studies 56, no. 4: 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, and Ngoc, P. T.. 2019. “Rust Removal: Why Vietnam’s Anti-Corruption Efforts Have Failed to Deliver Results and What That Implies for Future Campaigns.” In The Political Logics of Anticorruption Efforts in Asia, edited by Chen, Cheng and Meredith, L. Weiss, 129–73. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, Gueorguiev, Dimitar, and Jensen, Nathan. 2015. “Monopoly Money: Foreign Investment and Bribery in Vietnam, a Survey Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 2: 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bình, Mỹ. 2019. “Bình Định: Công ty TNHH Nhật Minh Khai Thác, Vận Chuyển Đất Tại Núi Bà Hỏa Chưa Có Giấy Phép” [Binh Dinh: Nhat Minh Co., Ltd. exploits and transports rock in Ba Hoa Mountain without a permit]. Báo Tài Nguyên Môi Trường Online, May 20. https://baotainguyenmoitruong.vn/ban-doc/binh-dinh-cong-ty-tnhh-nhat-minh-khai-thac-van-chuyen-dat-tai-nui-ba-hoa-chua-co-giay-phep-1269511.html.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hai Hong. 2016. Political Dynamic of Grassroots Democracy in Vietnam. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Thuy Tu, and Mathijs, van Dijk. 2012. “Corruption, Growth, and Governance: Private vs. State-Owned Firms in Vietnam.” Journal of Banking and Finance 36, no. 11: 2935–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nhân, Dân. 2017. “Cần Xử Lý Nghiêm Sai Phạm Đối Với Doanh Nghiệp Khai Thác Tại Mỏ đá Mường Ẳng 4” [It is necessary to strictly handle violations of enterprises exploiting at Muong Ang Quarry 4]. Nhân Dân, October 9. http://www.nhandan.com.vn/bandoc/item/34350702-can-xu-ly-nghiem-sai-pham-doi-voi-doanh-nghiep-khai-thac-tai-mo-da-muong-ang-4.html.Google Scholar
Nuijten, Monique, and Anders, Gerhard, eds. 2007. Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph. 2002. “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.” In Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts, edited by Heidenheimer, Arnold and Johnson, Michael, 281–300. 3rd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Ortman, Stephan. 2017. Environmental Governance in Vietnam: Institutional Reforms and Failures. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Timothy, Robinson, Dawn T., and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2010. “Three Faces of Identity.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 477–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxfam. 2013. Luật Đất Đai: Một Góc Nhìn Khác Từ Tổ Chức Oxfam [Land law: another view from Oxfam]. July 2. https://batdongsan.com.vn/phan-tich-nhan-dinh/luat-dat-dai-mot-goc-nhin-khac-tu-to-chuc-oxfam-ar49117.Google Scholar
Painter, Martin, Dao, Le Thu, Hoang, Manh Chien, and Nguyen, Quang Ngoc. 2012. International Comparative Analysis of Anti-Corruption Legislation: Lessons on Sanctioning and Enforcement Mechanisms for Viet Nam. Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption, Policy Discussion Papers. Hanoi: UNDP.Google Scholar
Phuong, N. H., Thủy, T. T., and Dũng, N. V.. 2013. “Đánh Giá Tác động Môi Trường ở Việt Nam: Cải Cách Chính Sách để Góp Phần Giảm Xung đột và Tranh Chấp Môi Trường” [Environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: policy reform to help reduce conflict and environmental disputes]. Hanoi: Trung Tâm Con Người và Thiên Nhiên.Google Scholar
Public Administration Performance Index. 2018. “The Viet Nam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index 2018 Measuring Citizens’ Experiences.” UNDP. http://www.vn.undp.org/content/vietnam/en/home/library/papi-2018.html.Google Scholar
Quigley, John. 1988. “Vietnam at the Legal Crossroads Adopts a Penal Code.” American Journal of Comparative Law 36, no. 2: 351–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinsberg, Bernhard, Stubbs, Thomas, Kentikelenis, Alexander, and King, Lawrence. 2019. “Bad Governance: How Privatization Increases Corruption in the Developing World.” Regulation and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynaers, Anne-Marie, and Gjalt, De Graaf. 2014. “Public Values in Public–Private Partnerships.” International Journal of Public Administration 37: 120–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Palifka, Bonnie J.. 2016. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikor, Thomas, Dorondel, Stefan, Stahl, Johannes, and Xuan To, Phuc. 2017. When Things Become Property: Land Reform, Authority and Value in Postsocialist Europe and Asia. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. 2000. “Property and Social Relations: From Title to Entitlement.” In Property and Values: Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership, edited by Geisler, Charles and Daneker, Gail, 3–20. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jonathan, Malesky, Edmund M. and Gueorguiev, Dimitar. 2017. China’s Governance Puzzle: Enabling Transparency and Participation in a Single-Party State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TN&MT, Theo. 2017. “Quản Lý và Bảo Vệ Môi Trường Trong Khai Thác Khoáng Sản ở Điện Biên” [Environmental management and protection in mineral exploitation in Dien Biên]. Môi Trờng và Đô Thị, April 28. https://www.moitruongvadothi.vn/tai-nguyen/khoang-san/quan-ly-va-bao-ve-moi-truong-tr111ng-khai-thac-khoang-san-o-dien-bien-a14008.html.Google Scholar
Transparency International Index. 2018. Corruption Perception Index. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn. 1995. “Vietnam: The Changing Models of Legitimation.” In Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 257–92. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vietnam Lawyers Association and UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2016. 2015 Justice Index: Towards a Justice System for the People. Hanoi: UNDP.Google Scholar
Vo Van Kiet. 1986. “Report to the National Assembly on the 1987 Socio-Economic Development Plan.” Hanoi Domestic Service, December 26. FIBIS Asia and Pacific Daily Report, December 30.Google Scholar
Wedel, Janine. 2012. “Rethinking Corruption in an Age of Ambiguity.” Annual Review of Social Science 8: 453–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Corruption from the Perspectives of Citizens, Firms and Public Officials. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.Google Scholar
Tư, Xuân, Tiến, Xuân and Anh, Tuấn. 2018. “Vẫn Nóng Tình Trạng Khai Thác Cát Trái Phép Tại Điện Biên Thứ Bảy” [Illegal sand mining in Dien Biên is still a hot issue]. Báo Tin Tức, June 2. https://baotintuc.vn/phong-su-dieu-tra/van-nong-tinh-trang-khai-thac-cat-trai-phep-tai-dien-bien-20180602093311627.htm.Google Scholar
Zaloznaya, Marina. 2013. “Beyond Anti-Corruptionism: Sociological Imagination and Comparative Study of Corruption.” Comparative Sociology 12: 705–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaloznaya, Marina. 2014. “The Social Psychology of Corruption: Why It Does Not Exist and Why It Should.” Sociology Compass 8, no. 2: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Junming, and Marian, Chertow. 2017. “Authoritarian but Responsive: Local Regulation of Industrial Energy Efficiency in Jiangsu, China.” Regulation & Governance 13, no. 3: 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar