Article contents
Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom‐Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
We develop a political history of Wards Cove v. Atonio (1989) to show how Robert Cover's concepts of jurisgenesis and jurispathy can enrich the legal mobilization framework for understanding law and social change. We illustrate the value of the hybrid theory by recovering the Wards Cove workers’ own understanding of the role of litigation in their struggle for workplace rights. The cannery worker plaintiffs exemplified Cover's dual logic by articulating aspirational narratives of social justice and by critically rebuking the Supreme Court's ruling as the “death throe” for progressive minority workers’ rights advocacy. The cannery workers’ story also highlights the importance of integrating legal mobilization scholars’ focus on extrajudicial political engagement into Cover's judge‐centered analysis. Our aim is to forge a theoretical bridge between Cover's provocative arguments about law and the analytical tradition of social science scholarship on the politics of legal mobilization.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016
References
References
Interviews
Cases Cited
Statutes Cited
- 9
- Cited by