Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:22:55.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contesting Probation in Scotland: How An Agonistic Perspective Travels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Fergus McNeill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this Review Essay, I try to rise to one of the challenges that Goodman, Page, and Phelps pose to other scholars in their book, Breaking the Pendulum (2017). They invite us to explore whether and how well their “agonistic perspective” on penal change travels. In response, I draw on original archival and oral history research on probation history in Scotland to explore their model’s utility in the context of this particular and challenging test case. Although Scotland is often discussed as an anomaly because of a supposed consensus around an enduring commitment to penal welfarism, my analysis reveals precisely the kinds of contestation that Goodman, Page, and Phelps describe. I conclude that their agonistic perspective seems to travel well, at least to this Atlantic edge of Europe, but that scholars in other jurisdictions will need either to undertake or revisit primary research to properly test the model and further refine it.

Type
Review Symposium: Rethinking the Pendulum Model of Criminal Justice History
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 814 - 821
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buchanan, W.G. “The Duties of a Probation Officer” Probation April (1934): 295–96, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, W.G.. “Probation in Glasgow: Probation April (1936): 55–56, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Glasgow. Probation. A Brief Survey of Fifty Years of the Probation Service of the City of Glasgow 1905–1955. Glasgow: City of Glasgow Probation Area Committee, 1955.Google Scholar
Garland, David. Punishment and Welfare. Aldershot, UK: Gower, 1985.Google Scholar
Garland, David.. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David.. “Penality and the Penal State” Criminology 51 no. 3 (2013): 475–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Philip, Page, Joshua, and Phelps, Michelle, Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Christine. “Probation Officers for Young Offenders in 1920s Scotland” European Journal of Probation 9, no. 2 (2017): 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAra, Lesley. “The Politics of Penality: An Overview of the Development of Penal Policy in Scotland.” In Criminal Justice in Scotland. Edited by Duff, Peter and Hutton, Neil, 355–80. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
McAra, Lesley.. “Modelling Penal Transformation” Punishment and Society 7, no. 3 (2005): 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAra, Lesley.. “Crime, Criminology and Criminal Justice in Scotland” European Journal of Criminology 5, no. 4 (2008): 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, Fergus. “Remembering Probation in Scotland” Probation Journal 52, no. 1 (2005): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, Fergus.. “Helping, Holding, Hurting: Recalling and Reforming Punishment.” Sixth Annual Apex Lecture, Signet Library, Parliament Square, Edinburgh, September 8, 2009. Available at: https://pure.strath.ac.uk/portal/files/521675/strathprints026701.pdf.Google Scholar
McNeill, Fergus.. “Reductionism, Rehabilitation and Reparation: Community Punishment in Scotland.” In Community Punishment: European Perspectives. Edited by Robinson, Gwen and McNeill, Fergus, 173–90. London: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, Fergus, and Whyte, Bill. Reducing Reoffending: Social Work and Community Justice in Scotland. Cullompton, UK: Willan, 2007.Google Scholar
Morton Report. Committee on Protection and Training. Edinburgh: HMSO, 1928.Google Scholar
Radzinowicz, Sir Leon (ed.). The Results of Probation. A Report of the Cambridge Department of Criminal Science. London: Macmillan, 1958.Google Scholar
Snacken, Sonja. “Resisting Punitiveness in Europe?” Theoretical Criminology 14, no. 3 (2010): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar