Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:05:19.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensus in the Penal Field? Revisiting Breaking the Pendulum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Joshua Page ,
Michelle Phelps  and
Philip Goodman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Essay responds to thoughtful analyses from Ashley Rubin, Johann Koehler, Geoff Ward, and Fergus McNeill on our book Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice (2017). In particular, we revisit our claim that consensus within the penal field is illusory. Drawing inspiration from our interlocutors, we argue that while recognized actors constantly struggle over the character and scope of criminal justice, they agree (at least implicitly) that certain positions are “unthinkable” and certain actors must remain outside the field. This “conflictual consensus” limits radical transformations of criminal justice. Our revised perspective encourages scholars to analyze how marginal positions and actors become part of the field, as well as the effects they produce while trying to reshape its boundaries. We conclude by sketching out how scholars have extended and revised the agonistic perspective we advance in Breaking the Pendulum and where we might turn next.

Type
Review Symposium: Rethinking the Pendulum Model of Criminal Justice History
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 822 - 827
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Goodman, Phillip, and Dawe, Meghan. “Prisoners, Cows and Abattoirs: The Closing of Canada’s Prison Farms as a Political Penal Drama.” The British Journal of Criminology 56, no. 4 (2015): 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. Agonists: Thinking the World Politically. New York: Verson, 2013.Google Scholar
Piché, Justin. “Review of Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice.” Social Justice 43, no. 4 (2017): 123–126.Google Scholar
Rubin, Ashley. “Resistance or Friction: Understanding the Significance of Prisoners’ Secondary Adjustments.” Theoretical Criminology 19, no. 1 (2015): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Ashley.. “Punishment’s Legal Templates: A Theory of Formal Penal Change.” Law & Society Review 53, no. 2 (2019): 518–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, Heather. Building the Prison State: Race and the Politics of Mass Incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, Jocelyn. “Democratizing Criminal Justice through Contestation and Resistance.” Northwestern University Law Review 111, no. 6 (2017): 1609–1624.Google Scholar