Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:09:43.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Child Savers and Unchildlike Youth: Class, Race, and Juvenile Justice in the Early Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2019

Abstract

This essay analyzes inequality and the construction of childhood in the early US juvenile justice system. Although the juvenile justice movement’s best intentions focused on protecting children from neglect and the criminal justice system, historians have argued that protective juvenile justice was unequal and ephemeral. I critically summarize three histories of juvenile justice: Anthony Platt’s The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency (1969), Geoff Ward’s The Black Child-Savers: Racial Democracy and Juvenile Justice (2012), and Tera Agyepong’s The Criminalization of Black Children: Race, Gender, and Delinquency in Chicago’s Juvenile Justice System, 1899–1945 (2018). I argue that the common thread in these studies is the construction of poor and black youth as unchildlike. Because the juvenile court arose in a context where not all youth were considered children, it never treated all youth as innocent or in need of protection.

Type
Review Essays
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agyepong, Tera. The Criminalization of Black Children: Race, Gender, and Delinquency in Chicago’s Juvenile Justice System, 1899–1945. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, Stuart.Global Crises of Childhood: Rights, Justice, and the Unchildlike Child.” Areas 33, no. 2 (2001): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard Saul. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robin. Racial Innocence: Performing American Childhood from Slavery to Civil Rights. New York: New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brace, Charles Loring. The Dangerous Classes of New York, and Twenty Years’ Work among Them. New York: Wynkoop & Hallenbeck, 1872.Google Scholar
Breckinridge, Sophonisba, and Abott., Edith The Delinquent Child and the Home. New York: Charities Publication Committee, 1912.Google Scholar
Brewer, Holly. By Birth or Consent: Children, Law, and the Anglo-American Revolution in Authority. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brown, Elizabeth.The ‘Unchildlike Child’: Making and Marking the Child/Adult Divide in the Juvenile Court.” Children’s Geographies 9, no. 3–4 (2011): 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Elizabeth, and Barganier., George Race and Crime: Geographies of Injustice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bush, William. Who Gets a Childhood? Race and Juvenile Justice in Twentieth-Century Texas. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Carlson, Elof Axel.R.L. Dugdale and the Jukes Family: A Historical Injustice Corrected.” BioScience 30, no. 8 (August 1980): 535–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez-García, Miroslava.In Retrospect: Anthony M. Platt’s The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency.” In Platt, Anthony, The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency, xixxxvi. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Chávez-García, Miroslava. States of Delinquency: Race and Science in the Making of California’s Juvenile Justice System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez-García, Miroslava.Youth of Color and California’s Carceral State: The Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility.” Journal of American History (June 2015): 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, Ronald, Vidal, Sarah, and Harmon, Michele. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Police Handling of Juvenile Arrests.” Crime & Delinquency 64, no. 11 (2018): 1375–93.Google Scholar
Cooley, Edwin. Probation and Delinquency: The Study and Treatment of the Individual Delinquent. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1927.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert.Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiIulio, John.The Coming of the Super-Predators.” Weekly Standard, November 27,1995.Google Scholar
Dohrn, Bernardine.The School, the Child, and the Court.” In A Century of Juvenile Justice, edited by Rosenheim, Margaret, et al., 267309. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dugdale, Robert. The Jukes: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease, and Heredity. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1877.Google Scholar
Fader, Jamie, Kurlycheck, Megan, and Morgan., KristinThe Color of Juvenile Justice: Racial Disparities in Dispositional Decisions.” Social Science Research 44 (March 2014): 126–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feld, Barry.Abolish the Juvenile Court: Youthfulness, Criminal Responsibility, and Sentencing Policy.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88 (1997): 68136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Barry.My Life in Crime: An Intellectual History of the Juvenile Court.” Nevada Law Journal 17, no. 2 (2017): 299330.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Edited by Arnold Davidson; translated by Macey, David. New York: Picador, 2003.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sandra.Juvenile Justice System: Critics Say It Is a Failure.” New York Times, November 22, 1981.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. “Changing Conceptions of Child Welfare in the United States, 1820-1935.” In A Century of Juvenile Justice, edited by Rosenheim, Margaret K., et al., 341. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hall, Stanley G. Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education. New York: Appleton, 1904.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard. Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard. “The ‘73 Graft: Punishment, Political Economy, and the Genealogy of Morals.” Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14–485 (2015), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2673062.Google Scholar
Henderson, Charles Richmond. Introduction to the Study of the Dependent, Defective, and Delinquent Classes. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co, 1901.Google Scholar
Hicks, Cheryl. Talk with You Like a Woman: African American Women, Justice, and Reform in New York, 1890–1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, T.D. Origin of the Illinois Juvenile Court Law: Juvenile Courts and What They Have Accomplished. 3rd ed. Chicago: Visitation and Aid Society, 1907.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Nancy. White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America. New York: Penguin Random House, 2017.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael. In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Kunzel, Regina. Fallen Women, Problem Girls: Unmarried Mothers and the Professionalization of Social Work, 1890–1945. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lesko, Nancy. Act Your Age! A Cultural Construction of Adolescence. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, Rebecca. “When Felons Were Human.” On the Human: A Project of the National Humanities Center. August 16, 2011, https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/on-the-human/2011/08/when-felons-were-human/.Google Scholar
Mennel, Robert. Thorns & Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1825–1940. Hanover, NH: University of New Hampshire, 1973.Google Scholar
Muhammad, Khalil Gibran. The Condemnation of Blackness: Race, Crime, and the Making of Modern Urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisciotta, Alexander.Race, Sex, and Rehabilitation: A Study of Differential Treatment in the Juvenile Reformatory, 1825-1900.” Crime and Delinquency 29, no. 2 (1983): 254–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Anthony. The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Platt, Anthony.The Child Savers Reconsidered.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 18 20, no. 1 (2008): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Anthony. The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Platt, Anthony. Beyond These Walls: Rethinking Crime and Punishment in the United States. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Rendleman, Douglas.Parens Patriae: From Chancery to the Juvenile Court.” South Carolina Law Review 23 (1971): 205–60.Google Scholar
Riis, Jacob. How the Other Half Lives: Studies among the Tenements of New York. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Nancy.Concentrated Disadvantage and the Incarceration of Youth: Examining How Context Affects Juvenile Justice.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 50, no. 2 (2013): 189215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, David. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.Google Scholar
Rush, Benjamin.Of the Mode of Education Proper in a Republic.” [1798]. In The Selected Writings of Benjamin Rush, edited by Runes, Dagobert, 8796. New York: The Philosophical Library, 1947.Google Scholar
Schlossman, Steven. Love and the American Delinquent: The Theory and Practice of ‘Progressive’ Juvenile Justice, 1825–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, James. Industrial Violence and the Legal Origins of Child Labor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Eric. In the Web of Class: Delinquents and Reformers in Boston, 1810s–1930 s. New York: New York University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Scott, Elizabeth.The Legal Construction of Childhood.” In A Century of Juvenile Justice, edited by Rosenheim, Margaret K., et al., 113–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stern, Alexandra Minna. Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, David. Juvenile Justice in the Making. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Trost, Jennifer. Gateway to Justice: The Juvenile Court and Progressive Child Welfare in a Southern City. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ward, Geoff. The Black Child-Savers: Racial Democracy and Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welke, Barbara. Law and the Borders of Belonging in the Long Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willrich, Michael.The Two Percent Solution: Eugenic Jurisprudence and the Socialization of American Law, 1900-1930.” Law and History Review 16, no. 1 (Spring 1998): 63111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willrich, Michael. City of Courts: Socializing Justice in Progressive Era Chicago. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Yochelson, Bonnie, and Czitrom., Daniel Rediscovering Jacob Riis: Exposure Journalism and Photography in Turn-of-the-Century New York. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin.The Common Thread: Diversion in the Jurisprudence of Juvenile Courts.” In A Century of Juvenile Justice, edited by Rosenheim, Margaret K., et al., 142–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

CASES CITED

Commonwealth v. Fisher, 27 Pa. 175 (1905).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 18 (1967).Google Scholar