Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:10:18.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bucking the Party Line: Calavita's Invitation to Law & Society (In Which the Author Is Invited to a Party Where He Encounters Many Old and Familiar Faces, Becomes Argumentative, Stays Up Too Late, and Finally Departs in Search of New Adventures)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Christopher Tomlins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intended as a short survey text, Kitty Calavita's Invitation to Law & Society expertly summarizes many of the central themes of law and society scholarship as they have developed over the past fifty years. It also clearly identifies the field's object of attention: “real” law. I use this commentary on the book as an opportunity to assess the field as it enters its sixth decade. How has the field changed? What are its defining characteristics? What is “real” law? Does law and society research have a future?

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Winter 2014 , pp. 226 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calavita, Kitty 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William J. 1964. A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy. Social Problems 12:67–77.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2005. Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2011. Law as Claim to Justice: Legal History and Legal Speech Acts. UC Irvine Law Review 1 (3): 631–640.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan, Richland, Justin, and Fortin, Veronique 2014. Routine Exceptionality: The Plenary Power Doctrine, Immigrants, and the Indigenous under U.S. Law. UC Irvine Law Review 4 (1).Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Stefanic, Jean 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Du Ponceau, Peter 1824. A Dissertation on the Nature and Extent of the Jurisdiction of the Courts of the United States. Philadelphia: Abraham Small.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard, and Sanders, Joseph 1986. An Invitation to Law and Social Science: Desert, Disputes, and Distribution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Kunal M. 2011a. Common Law, History, and Democracy in America: Legal Thought Before Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Kunal M. 2011b. Law “In” and “As” History. The Common Law in the American Polity, 1790–1900. UC Irvine Law Review 1 (3): 587–609.Google Scholar
Rusche, Georg, and Kirchheimer, Otto 1939. Punishment and Social Structure. Trans. Moishe Finkelstein and Otto Kirchheimer. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. 1988. Invitation to Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tigar, Michael E., and Levy, Madeleine R. 1977. Law and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2007. How Autonomous Is Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:45–68.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2012. After Critical Legal History: Scope, Scale, Structure. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8:1–38.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher, and Comaroff, John 2011. “Law As …”: Theory and Practice in Legal History. UC Irvine Law Review 1 (3): 1039–1079.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1990. Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18 (1): 1–56.Google Scholar