Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:41:46.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Compare? Criticizing “The American Way of Law”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

David Nelken
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on Kagan's Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 799 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atiyah, Patrick, and Robert, Robert. 1987. Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1994. The Infrastructure of Legal Culture in Holland and West Germany. Law and Society Review 28 (4): 789–809.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1997. Civil Litigation Rates as Indicators for Legal Culture. In Nelken ed. 1997, 41–68.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard, and Frank, Frank. 1994. Dutch Legal Culture. 2d ed. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Brants, Chrisjie, and Stewart, Stewart. 2000. Legal Cultures, Political Cultures and Procedural Traditions. In Nelken ed. 2000, 77–116.Google Scholar
Campos, Paul F. 2000. Jurismania: The Madness of American Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Tanugi, Laurent. 1996. The Law without the State. In Gessner et al. 1996, 269–73.Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. 2000. Contingent Articulations: A Critical Studies of Law. In Law in the Domains of Culture, ed. Austin, Sarat and Thomas, Kearns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 1997. The Concept of Legal Culture. In Nelken ed. 1997, 13–32.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan. 1986. The Faces of Justice and State Authority. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant, Bryant. 1996. Dealing in Virtue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1980. The State Tradition in Western Europe. Oxford, England: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2003. The Judge over Your Shoulder: Is Adversarial Legalism Exceptionally American Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 743–70.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarese, Maria Rosaria. 2000. Le Istituzioni della Globalizzazione, Bologna, Italy: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1985. Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1994. Is There a Modern Legal Culture Ratio Juris 23 (1): 117.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1997. The Concept of Legal Culture: A Reply. In Nelken ed. 1997, 33–40.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1981. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. In The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon Fuller, ed. Kenneth, Winston, 87–124. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine. 1995. French Legal Culture and the Shock of “Globalization.” In Nelken ed. 1995b, 493–506.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2000. The Culture of Control. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar, Armin, Hoeland, and Casba, Varga, eds. 1996. European Legal Cultures. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Abraham, and Martin, Martin. 1977. The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three Inquisitorial Systems: France, Italy and Germany. Yale Law Journal 87: 240–83.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee, and Joseph, Joseph. 1992. Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf. 2001. From Globalisation of Law to Law under Globalisation. In Nelken and Feest 2001, 117–37.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip K. 1996. The Death of Common Sense: How Law Is Suffocating America. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2003. American Law in Japanese Perspective. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 771–98.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2003. On Surveying the Whole Legal Forest. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 833–72.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., and Lee, Axelrad, eds. 2000. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, John, and Lloyd, Lloyd. 1978. Continental Criminal Procedure: Myth and Reality. Yale Law Journal 87: 1549–69.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. 1997. Against a European Civil Code. Modern Law Review 60: 44–63.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. 2001. What Transplants? In Nelken and Feest 2001, 55–69.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard, and Joseph, Joseph. 1986. An Invitation to Law and Social Science. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga. 1989. Playing the Opposites Game, review of The Faces of Justice and State Authority, by Mirjan Damaska. Stanford Law Review 41: 1313.Google Scholar
Markensinis, Basil. 1990. Litigation Mania in England, Germany and the USA: Are We So Very Different Cambridge Law Journal 49: 233–76.Google Scholar
Melossi, Dario. 1990. The State of Social Control. Oxford, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1981. The Gap Problem in the Sociology of Law. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice. 1981: 35–62.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1995. Introduction. In Nelken ed. 1995b, 435–52.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1996. Judicial Politics and Corruption in Italy. In Journal of Law and Society, special issue: Corruption of Politics and the Politics of Corruption, ed. Michael Levi and David Nelken, 95–113.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1997. Puzzling out Legal Culture: A Comment on Blankenburg. In Nelken ed. 1997, 58–88.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1998. A Just Measure of Science. In Science in Court, ed. M. Freeman and H. Reece, 11–36.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2000a. Telling Difference. In Nelken ed. 2000, 233–264.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2000b. Virtually There, Researching There, Living There. In Nelken ed. 2000, 23–48.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2001a. Beyond the Metaphor of Legal Transplants? Consequences of Autopoietic Theory for the Study of Cross-Cultural Legal Adaptation. In Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis, ed. Jiri, Priban and David, Nelken, 265–302. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2001b. Comparative Sociology of Law. In Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Max, Travers and Reza, Benakar, 329–44. Oxford, England: Hart.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003a. Comparativists and Transfers. In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, ed. Pierre, Legrand and Roderick, Munday, 437–66. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003b. Comparing Legal Cultures. In Blackwell Handbook to Law and Society, ed. Austin, Sarat. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003c. Corruption in the European Union. In Corruption and Scandal in Contemporary Politics, ed. Martin, Bull and James, Newell, 220–33. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003d. Criminology: Crime's Changing Boundaries. In Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies, ed. Peter, Cane and Mark, Tushnet. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003e. Legitimate Suspicion? Berlusconi and the Judges. In Politics in Italy 2003, ed. Jean, Blondel and Paul, Segatti. Oxford, England: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Nelken, David., ed. 1995a. Law as Communication. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Nelken, David., ed. 1995b. Social and Legal Studies, special issue: Legal Culture, Diversity and Globalization. Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Nelken, David., ed. 1997. Comparing Legal Cultures. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Nelken, David., ed. 2000. Contrasting Criminal Justice. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Nelken, David, and Johannes, Feest, ed. 2001. Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford, England: Hart.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Phillip, Phillip. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Towards Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 1996. Lawyers and Their Society. In Gessner et al. 1996, 274–77.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. 2000. Administrative Law and the Complexity of Culture. In Legislative Drafting for Market Reform: Some Lessons from China, ed. Anne, Seidman, Robert, Seidman, and Janice, Payne, 88–108. Hampshire, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph. 2003. Adversarial Legalism and Civil Litigation: Prospects for Change. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 719–42.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 1999. Globalisation and the Fate of Law. In Recrafting the Rule of Law, ed. David, Dyzenhaus, 243–66. Oxford, England: Hart.Google Scholar
Scott, James. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tanase, Takao. 2001. The Empty Space of the Modern in Japanese Law Discourse. In Nelken and Feest ed. 2001, 187–98.Google Scholar
Teubner, Guenther. 1998. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences. Modern Law Review 61: 11–32.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence. 1971. Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process. Harvard Law Review 84: 1329.Google Scholar