Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:57:39.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between the Law: The Unmaking of Empire and Law's Imperial Amnesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Yukiko Koga
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Asian victims of Japanese imperialism have filed lawsuits against the Japanese government and corporations since the 1990s, which became prime sites for redress decades after Japan's defeat in World War II. As this ethnography demonstrates, this process paradoxically exposes a legal lacuna within this emergent transnational legal space, with plaintiffs effectively caught between the law, instead of standing before the law. Exploring this absence of law, I map out a post‐imperial legal space, created through the erasure of imperial and colonial subjects in the legal framework after empire. Between the law is an optic that makes visible uneven legal terrains that embody temporal and spatial disjuncture, rupture, and asymmetry. The role of law in post‐imperial transitions remains underexplored in literatures on transnational law, legal imperialism, postcolonialism, and transitional justice. I demonstrate how, at the intersection of law and economy, post‐imperial reckoning is emerging as a new legal frontier, putting at stake law's imperial amnesia.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Spring 2016 , pp. 402 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anghie, Antony. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. 2014. Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea. Law & Society Review 48 (3): 563–93.Google Scholar
Asano, Toyomi. 2013. Sengo Nihon no baishō mondai to Higashi Ajia chiiki saihen: seikyūken to rekishi ninshiki mondai no kigen [Japanese Postwar Reparation and Reconfiguration of the East Asia Region: The Right to Claim Reparation and the Origin of the Historical Consciousness Problem]. Tokyo: Jigakusha shuppan.Google Scholar
Askin, Kelly D. 2001. Comfort Women: Shifting Shame and Stigma from Victims to Victimizers. International Criminal Law Review 1 (1/2): 5–32.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Ruth, and Sundhya, Pahuja. 2004. Legal Imperialism: Empire's Invisible Hand? In Empire's New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri, ed. Andrew Passavant, Paul and Dean, Jodi, 73–95. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cao, Haidong, and Huang, Xiaowei. 2008. Riben dui hua yuanzhu san shi nian [Thirty Years of Japan's Aid to China]. Nanfang zhoumo, February 20. http://www.infzm.com/content/7707 (accessed May 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Chūgokujin sensō higai baishō seikyū jiken bengodan, ed. 2005. Sajō no shōheki: Chūgokujin sengo hoshō saiban 10 nen no kiseki [The Barrier Built on the Sand: The Ten‐Year Trajectory of the Postwar Compensation Lawsuits by Chinese War Victims]. Tokyo: Nihon hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Jean, Comaroff. 2006. Law and Disorder in the Postcolony: An Introduction. In Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, ed. Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John L., 1–56, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2012. What Is Transnational Law? Law & Social Inquiry 37 (2): 500–24.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1991. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money, trans. Peggy Kamuf. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992a. Before the Law. In Acts of Literature, ed. Attridge, Derek, 181–220. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992b. Force of Law: “The Mystical Foundations of Authority.” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, ed. Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfeld, Michel, and Gray Calson, David, 3–29. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Draper, Nicholas. 2010. The Price of Emancipation: Slave‐Ownership, Compensation and British Society at the End of Slavery. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Caroline. 2005. Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Gaimushō, kanrikyoku. 1946a. Kajin rōmusha shūrō jijō chōsa hōkokusho [Field Reports on the Work Condition of the Chinese Laborers]. Tokyo: Diplomatic Record Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.Google Scholar
Gaimushō, kanrikyoku. 1946b. Kajin rōmusha shūrō tenmatsu hōkoku (yōshi) [Reports on the Work Condition of the Chinese Laborers (Summary)]. Tokyo: Diplomatic Record Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.Google Scholar
Gaimushō, kanrikyoku. 1952–1972. Taiheiyō sensō shūketsu ni yoru naigai jin hogo hikiage (gaikokujin) [Protection and Repatriation of Japanese and Foreigners at the End of the Pacific War (Foreigners)]. Tokyo: Diplomatic Record Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.Google Scholar
Gao, William. 2007. Overdue Redress: Surveying and Explaining the Shifting Japanese Jurisprudence on Victims’ Compensation Claims. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 45:529–50.Google Scholar
Gardner, James A. 1980. Legal Imperialism: American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin America. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gotō, Mitsuo. 2012. Nihonkoku kenpō seiteishi ni okeru “Nihon kokumin” to “gaikokujin” [“Japanese People” and “Foreigners” in the Drafting of the Japanese Constitution]. Hikaku hōgaku [Comparative Law Review] 45 (3): 1–28.Google Scholar
Gotō, Mitsuo. 2013. Nihonkoku kenpō 10‐jō: kokusekihō to kyūshokuminchi shusshinsha” [Japanese Constitution Article 10: Japanese Nationality Law and Former Colonial Subjects]. Waseda shakai kagaku sōgō kenkyū [Waseda Studies in Social Sciences] 13 (3): 19–39.Google Scholar
He, Tianyi, ed. 2005. Erzhan lu Ri Zhongguo laogong koushushi [Oral History of Japanese‐Captured Chinese Forced Laborers during the Second World War]. 5 vols. Jinan, China: Qilu shushe.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Fleur. 2013. Non‐Legality in International Law: Unruly Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz. [1924] 1988. The Trial, definitive ed., trans. Willa and Edwin Muir. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Kang, Sang‐jung. 1996. Orientarizumu no kanata e: kindai bunka hihan [Beyond Orientalism: Critique of Modern Culture]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Kim, Taejin. 2014. “Views on Compensation for Conscripted Korean Laborers from Japanese Companies: A Recent Korean Supreme Court Case.” Asian Business Lawyer 13 (Spring): 15–34.Google Scholar
Koga, Yukiko. 2013. Accounting for Silence: Inheritance, Debt, and the Moral Economy of Legal Redress in China and Japan. American Ethnologist 40 (3): 494–507.Google Scholar
Koseki, Shōichi. 1989. Shin‐kenpō no tanjō [The Birth of the New Constitution]. Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha.Google Scholar
Kratoska, Paul H., ed. 2005. Asian Labor in the Wartime Japanese Empire: Unknown Histories. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Levin, Mark A. 2008. Supreme Court of Japan Decision 2008/04/27: Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Song Jixiao et al. American Journal of International Law 102:148–54.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Katsuyoshi. 2003. “Kokka mutōseki no hōri” to minpōten [The Doctrine of State Immunity and the Civil Code]. Ritsumeikan hōgaku 292:317–82.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. [1924] 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. W. D. Halls. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (4): 975–95.Google Scholar
Murashige, Kei'ichi. 1996. Kokka baishō kenkyū nōto [State Redress Research Notes]. Tokyo: Hanrei taimuzu.Google Scholar
NHK Research Team. 1994. Maboroshino gaimushō hōkokusho: Chūgokujin kyōsei renkō no kiroku [A Phantom Reports on the Work Condition of the Chinese Laborers Compiled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The Record of the Chinese Forced Labor]. Tokyo: Nihon hōsō shuppan kyōkai.Google Scholar
Nishinarita, Yutaka. 2002. Chūgokujin kyōsei renkō [Chinese Forced Labor]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku shuppankai.Google Scholar
Oguma, Eiji. 1995. Tan'itsu minzoku shinwa no kigen: “Nihonjin” no jigazō no keigu [The Origin of the Myth of the Single Ethnic Nation: The Genealogy of the Self‐Portrait of “Japanese”]. Tokyo: Shinyōsha.Google Scholar
Okada, Masanori. 2013. Kuni no fuhō kōi sekinin to kōkenryoku no gainen‐shi: kokka baishō seido‐shi kenkyū [Wrongful Conduct of the State and the Intellectual History of Governmental Authority: Legal History of the State Redress System]. Tokyo: Kōbundō.Google Scholar
Ōnuma, Yasuaki. 1986. Tan'itsu minzoku shakai no shinwa o koete: zainichi Kankoku Chōsenjin to shutsunyūkoku kanri taisei [Beyond the Myth of a Single Ethnic Society: Koreans in Japan and the Emigration and Immigration Administration]. Tokyo: Tōshindō.Google Scholar
Ōnuma, Yasuaki. 2004. Zainichi Kankoku Chōsenjin no kokuseki to jinken [Nationality and Human Rights of Koreans in Japan]. Tokyo: Tōshindō.Google Scholar
Ōnuma, Yasuaki. 2007. Tōkyō saiban, sensō sekinin, sengo sekinin [Tokyo Tribunal, War Responsibility, Postwar Responsibility]. Tokyo: Tōshindō.Google Scholar
Schmidhauser, John R. 1992. Legal Imperialism: Its Enduring Impact on Colonial and Post‐Colonial Judicial Systems. International Political Science Review 13 (3): 321–34.Google Scholar
Shin, Hae Bong. 2005. Compensation for Victims of Wartime Atrocities: Recent Developments in Japan's Case Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3:187–206.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroshi, and Matsuzawa, Tetsunari, eds. 1995. Chūgokujin kyōsei renkō shiryō: “Gaimuhō hōkokusho” zen 5 bunsatsu hoka [Source Material on the Chinese Forced Labor: The Reports of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan]. Tokyo: Gendai shokan.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroshi, Utsumi, Aiko, and Ishitobi, Jin, eds. 1987. Shiryō Chūgokujin kyōsei renkō [Source Material: The Chinese Forced Labor]. Tokyo: Akashi shoten.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroshi, Utsumi, Aiko, and Nīimi, Takashi, eds. 1990. Shiryō Chūgokujin kyōsei renkō no kiroku [Source Material: Records of the Chinese Forced Labor]. Tokyo: Akashi shoten.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16:69–94.Google Scholar
Tong, Zeng. 1991. Guozhifa de xingainian: shouhai peichang [New Concept in International Law: Victim Compensation]. Fazhi ribao [Legal Daily] (Beijing), May 20, 3.Google Scholar
Yoneyama, Lisa. 2003. Traveling Memories, Contagious Justice: Americanization of Japanese War Crimes at the End of the Post‐Cold War. Journal of Asian American Studies 6 (1): 57–93.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2008. Transitional Justice in a Transnational World: The Ambiguous Role of Law. Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 40/2008. http://ssrn.com/abstract+1313725 (accessed May 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2011. Transnational Law, Evolving. Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 27/2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1975403 (accessed May 28, 2015).Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Heisei 5 (gyō u) No. 244 (human skeleton case). Tokyo Regional Court in Japan, December 5, 1994.Google Scholar
Heisei 8 (gyō tsu) No. 67 (human skeleton case). Supreme Court of Japan, December 19, 2000.Google Scholar
Heisei 8 (wa) No. 5435 (forced labor case). Supreme Court of Japan (dismissed on April 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Heisei 11 (wa) No. 543; Heisei 12 (wa) No. 489; Heisei 14 (wa) No. 139 (forced labor case). Nīgata Regional Court in Japan, March 26, 2004.Google Scholar
Heisei 12 (wa) No. 1550; Heisei 13 (wa) No. 1690; Heisei 13 (wa) No. 3862 (forced labor case). Fukuoka Regional Court of Japan, April 26, 2002.Google Scholar
Heisei 14 (ne) No. 511 (forced labor case). Fukuoka High Court in Japan, May 24, 2004.Google Scholar
Heisei 14 (ne) No. 511 (forced labor case). Supreme Court of Japan (dismissed on April 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Heisei 16 (ju) No. 1658 (forced labor case). Supreme Court of Japan, April 27, 2007.Google Scholar
Heisei 17 (ju) No. 1735 (comfort women case). Supreme Court of Japan, April 27, 2007.Google Scholar
Heisei 17 [o] No. 985 (comfort women case). Supreme Court of Japan (dismissed on April 27, 2007).Google Scholar
23‐2[A] KCCR 366, 2006Hun‐Ma788, “Challenge against Act of Omission Involving Article 3 of the ‘Agreement on the Settlement of Problem Concerning Property and Claims and the Economic Cooperation Between the Republic of Korea and Japan.’” South Korean Constitutional Court, August 30, 2011.Google Scholar
2009Da22549 (forced labor case). Supreme Court of Korea, May 24, 2012.Google Scholar
2012Na44947 (forced labor case). Seoul High Court in South Korea, July 10, 2013.Google Scholar
2012Na4497 (forced labor case). Busan High Court in South Korea, July 30, 2013.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Constitution of Japan (Nihonkoku kenpō)Google Scholar
Constitution of the Empire of Japan (Dai‐Nippon teikoku kenpō)Google Scholar
Hague ConventionGoogle Scholar
Japanese Civil Code (Minpō)Google Scholar
Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Riku‐sen no hōki kanshū ni kansuru jōyaku), JapanGoogle Scholar
State Redress Act (Kokka baishō‐hō), JapanGoogle Scholar