Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:37:43.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agents of Change or Unchanging Agents? The Role of Lawyers within Russian Industrial Enterprises

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kathryn Hendley ,
Peter Murrell  and
Randi Ryterman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The transition from state socialism toward market capitalism has led to an almost endless supply of new laws and legal institutions. Industrial enterprises need to adapt to this new institutional regime. In-house lawyers are well placed to be agents of change in facilitating this adjustment. Using survey data from 328 Russian enterprises, the article examines the role of company lawyers, asking whether they have fulfilled this potential. Legal expertise is not in short supply, but lawyers are marginalized within the enterprise. They focus on established, routine tasks, such as handling labor relations or drafting form contracts, rather than on shaping enterprise strategies in the newer areas created by the transition, such as corporate governance or securities law. The failure of in-house lawyers to emerge as agents of change in Russia reflects a continuation of their low status during the Soviet era and the lack of professional identity among these company lawyers.

Type
Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 685 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. 1988. Lawyers in the Civil Law World. In Abel and Lewis 1988.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., and Philip Lewis, S. C., eds. 1988. Lawyers in Society. Vol. 2, The Civil Law World. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ajani, Gianmaria. 1997. Legal Education in Russia: Present and Future—An Analysis of the State Educational Standards for Higher Professional Education and a Comparison with the European Legal Education Reform Experience. Review of Central and East European Law 23:267–300.Google Scholar
Åslund, Anders. 1995. How Russia Became a Market Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Attwood, Lynne. 1996. The Post-Soviet Woman in the Move to the Market: A Return to Domesticity and Dependence. In Women in Russia and Ukraine, ed. Marsh, Rosalind. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berliner, Joseph S. 1957. Factory and Manager in the USSR. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard, and Schultz, Ulrike. 1988. German Advocates: A Highly Regulated Profession. In Abel and Lewis 1988.Google Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 1988. The French Bar: The Difficulties of Unifying a Divided Profession. In Abel and Lewis 1988.Google Scholar
Boots, Stanley R. 1997. The Personal Contacts Alternative—A Comparison of Japanese and Russian Legal Cultures in the Russian Far East Timber Trade. International Legal Perspectives 9:257–305.Google Scholar
Boycko, Maxim, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1995. Privatizing Russia. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Phoebe W. 1996. Russian Women Lawyers in Post-Soviet Russia. Georgia State University Law Review 12:381–430.Google Scholar
Burrage, Michael. 1993. Russian Advocates: Before, During, and After Perestroika. Law and Social Inquiry 18:573–92.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Chayes, H. 1985. Corporate Counsel and the Elite Law Firm. Stanford Law Review 37:277–300.Google Scholar
Commander, Simon, Dutz, Mark, and Stem, Nicholas. 1999. Restructuring in Transition Economies: Ownership, Competition and Regulation. Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Crowley, Stephen. 1997. Hot Coal, Cold Steel: Russian and Ukrainian Workers from the End of the Soviet Union to the Post-Communist Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
D'Alemberte, Talbot “Sandy”. 1992. Our Eastern European Challenge: Providing Technical Assistance to Struggling Democracies. ABA Journal 78:8.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary C. 1997. The Cultural, Ethical, and Legal Challenges in Lawyering for a Global Organization: The Role of the General Counsel. Emory Law Journal 46:1057–1111.Google Scholar
Feifer, George. 1964. Justice in Moscow. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Robert Gordon, W., Pirie, Sophie, and Whatley, Edwin. 1989. Law, Lawyers, and Legal Practice in the Silicon Valley. Indiana Law Journal 64:555–67.Google Scholar
Gabor, Francis A. 1993. Legal Education in Hungary. Oregon Law Review 72:953–56.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giddings, Jane. 1975. Iuriskonsults in the USSR. Review of Socialist Law 1:171–211.Google Scholar
Granik, Lisa M. 1993. Legal Education in Post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine. Oregon Law Review 72:963–75.Google Scholar
Gray, Francine du Plessix. 1989. Soviet Women: Walking the Tightrope. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gunz, Sally, and Robert Jones, V.A. 1991. The New Corporate Counsel. Scarsborough, Ontario: Carswell Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Hajjar, Lisa. 1997. Cause Lawyering in Transnational Perspective: National Conflict and Human Rights in Israel/Palestine. Law and Society Review 31:473–504.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Kathleen Hull, E., and Ava Harter, A. 1999. Lawyers and Their Discontents: Findings from a Survey of the Chicago Bar. Indiana Law Journal 74:735–58.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Edward Laumann, O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Edward Laumann, O., with Robert Nelson, L. and Paul Schnorr, S. 1997. The Constituencies of Elite Urban Lawyers. Law and Society Review 31:441–72.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn 1998a. Growing Pains: Balancing Justice and Efficiency in the Russian Economic Courts. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 12:302–32.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn 1998b. Remaking an Institution: The Transition in Russia from State Arbitrazh to Arbitrazh Courts. American Journal of Comparative Law 46:93–127.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn 1999. How Russian Enterprises Cope With Payments Problems. Post-Soviet Affairs 15:201–34.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn Forthcoming. Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Business Disputes in Russia. In Assessing the Value of Law in Transition Economies, ed. Murrell, Peter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Barry Ickes, W., Murrell, Peter, and Ryterman, Randi. 1997. Observations on the Use of Law by Russian Enterprises. Post-Soviet Affairs 13:19–41.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, and Ryterman, Randi. 1999a. Do “Repeat Players” Behave Differently in Russia? An Evaluation of Contractual and Litigation Behavior of Russian Enterprises. Law and Society Review 33:1401–35.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, and Ryterman, Randi 1999b. A Regional Analysis of Transactional Strategies of Russian Enterprises. McGill Law Journal 44:433–72.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, and Ryterman, Randi 2000. Law, Relationships, and Private Enforcement: Transactional Strategies of Russian Enterprises. Europe-Asia Studies 54(4):627–56.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Glenn P. 1997. Business Litigation and Arbitration in Russia. International Lawyer 31:1075–1103.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Ed A. 1988. Reforming the Soviet Economy: Equality Versus Efficiency. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Huskey, Eugene. 1988. Specialists in the Soviet Communist Party Apparatus: Legal Professionals as Party Functionaries. Soviet Studies 40:538–55.Google Scholar
Huskey, Eugene 1991. Between Citizen and State: The Soviet Bar (Advokatura) under Gorbachev. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 28:95–116.Google Scholar
Jordan, Pamela. 1996a. Russian Advocates in a Post–Soviet World: The Struggle for Professional Identity and Efforts to Redefine Legal Services. Ph.D. diss. Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Jordan, Pamela 1996b. Russian Lawyers as Consumer Protection Advocates. Parker School Journal of East European Law 3:487–517.Google Scholar
Kaminskaya, Dina. 1982. Final Judgment: My Life as a Soviet Defense Attorney, trans. Glenny, Michael. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
John, Kenyon. 1999. Who is Kenneth Dart Moscow Times, 1 June.Google Scholar
Kolvenbach, Walter. 1979. The Company Legal Department: Its Role, Function, and Organization. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1996. Courts, Justice and Politics in England. In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, ed. Jacob, Herbert, Erhard Blankenburg, Herbert Kritzer M., Marie Provine, Doris, and Sanders, Joseph. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1998. Legal Advocacy: Lawyers and Nonlawyers at Work. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lapidus, Gail Warshofsky. 1978. Women in Soviet Society: Equality, Development, and Social Change. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1979. Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws. Law and Society Review 14:115–71.Google Scholar
Mackie, Karl J. 1989. Lawyers in Business: And the Law Business. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga. 1996. Children of a Lesser God: GDR Lawyers in Post-Socialist Ger, many. Michigan Law Review 94:2270–308.Google Scholar
McAuley, Mary. 1969. Labour Disputes in Soviet Russia: 1957–;65. Oxford, U.K: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition. 2d ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, William D. 1993. Remnants of Eastern Europe's Totalitarian Past: The Example of Legal Education in Bulgaria. Journal of Legal Education 43:227–45.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1988. Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Petrovna, Dimitrina. 1996. Political and Legal Limitations to the Development of Public Interest Law in Post-Communist Societies. Parker School Journal of East European Law 3:541–67.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, William. 1999. “Profession or Estate”? The Case of the Russian Pre-Revolutionary Advokatura. Slavonic and East European Review 77:240–68.Google Scholar
Rand, Robert. 1991. Comrade Lawyer. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf. 1995. German Corporate Lawyers: Social Closure in Autopoietic Perspective. In Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants, and the Social Construction of Markets, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Sugarman, David. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert Eli. 1989. The Inside Counsel Movement: Professional Judgment and Organizational Representation. Indiana Law Journal 64:479–553.Google Scholar
Ruble, Blair. 1981. Soviet Trade Unions: Their Development in the 1970s. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 1973. Lawyers and Their Society: A Comparative Study of the Legal Profession in Germany and in the United States. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1993. The Role of Lawyers in Social Change: Hungary. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 25:137–46.Google Scholar
Shelley, Louise I. 198182. Law in the Soviet Workplace: The Lawyer's Perspective. Law and Society Review 16:429–54.Google Scholar
Shelley, Louise I. 1984. Lawyers in Soviet Work Life. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Gordon B. 1978. The Soviet Procuracy and the Supervision of Administration. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. Jr., and Foglesong, Todd. 2000. Courts and Transition in Russia: The Challenge of Judicial Reform. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Solomonov, Eugene. 1999. U.S.-Russian Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty: Is There a Way to Control Russian Organized Crime Fordharn International Law Journal 23:165–229.Google Scholar
Spangler, Eve. 1986. Lawyers for Hire: Salaried Professionals at Work. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spedding, Linda S. 1987. Transnational Legal Practice in the EEC and the United States. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Thaman, Stephen C. 1996. Reform of the Procuracy and the Bar in Russia. Parker School Journal of East European Law 3:1–29.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 1999. Russian Oil Concern in Line of Fire. Financial Times, 22 July, p. 2.Google Scholar
Tikhomirov, Iu M., ed. 1996. Kommentarii k federal'nomu mkonu ob aktsionernykh obshchestvakh [Commentary on the Federal Law on Joint-stock Companies]. Moscow: Iurinformtsentr.Google Scholar
Houtte, Van, Jean, . 1999. Law in the World of Business: Lawyers in Large Industrial Enterprises. International Journal of the Legal Professions 6:7–25.Google Scholar
Woodruff, David. 1999. Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1996. From Plan to Market: The World Development Report, 1996. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar