Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:22:16.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Prevention? A Response to Harcourt's Against Prediction on Actuarial and Clinical Predictions and the Faults of Incapacitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Yoav Sapir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews Bernard Harcourt's Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age (2007), in which he criticizes the use of actuarial prediction methods in the contexts of policing and sentencing. I focus on the latter context. I argue that Harcourt has identified an important, and not exclusively American, trend and develops a valid critique of it that should be pushed further. From a theory of punishment perspective, I argue that Harcourt's critique is no less applicable to clinical prediction methods than to the use of actuarial ones. Harcourt's arguments, however, beg a more general explanation of the flaws of incapacitation as a justification for punishment. If we base our objection to the use of prediction methods on such larger grounds, questions arise as to the legitimacy of other practices that are not considered punitive but rather “regulatory” or “preventive.”

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , Winter 2008 , pp. 253 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boer, Douglas R., Hart, Stephen D., Kropp, P. Randall, and Webster, Christopher D. 1997. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional Guidelines for Assessing Risk of Sexual Violence. Vancouver: The British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar
Douglas, Kevin. S., and Weir, John. 2006. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Overview and Annotated Bibliography (with supplement, current up to January 12, 2006). http://www.violence-risk.com/hcr20annotated.pdf (accessed September 28, 2007).Google Scholar
Federal Sentencing Commission. Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Ch. 4 (Criminal History and Criminal Livelihood), Part A (Criminal History). http://www.ussc.gov/2004guid/CHAP4.htm (accessed October 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1965. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1998. The History of Sexuality, Vol. I: The Will to Knowledge, Part V. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–1976. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2001. Illusions of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2007. Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2008. A Reader's Companion to Against Prediction: A Reply to Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, and Yoav Sapir on Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, and Race. Law & Social Inquiry 33 (1): 265–83.Google Scholar
Hare, Robert D. 2003. Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. 2nd ed. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Hare, Robert D., Clark, Danny, Grann, Martin, and Thornton, David. 2000. Psychopathy and the Predictive Validity of the PCL-R: An International Perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 18:623–45.Google Scholar
Langer, Maximo. 2004. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal 45:1–64.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V. 1996. Public Opinion, Criminal Record, and the Sentencing Process. American Behavioural Sciences 39 (4): 488–99.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. 2001. Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice. Harvard Law Review 11 (5): 1429–436.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol. 1998. Foreword: The Limits of the Preventive State. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 88:771–808.Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Cabranes, Jose A. 1998. Fear of Judging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, Andrew. 1976. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishment. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, Andrew. 1985. Past or Future Crimes, Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals. Manchester, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar