Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:46:49.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Who Is a Homosexual?”: The Consolidation of Sexual Identities in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Immigration Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Margot Canaday
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay uses court records to trace the federal government's attempts to regulate homosexuality among immigrants in the mid-twentieth century, asserting that such attempts illustrate the state's struggle to make homosexuality visible, to produce a homosexuality that could be both detected and managed. I focus on the process by which two competing paradigms for understanding homosexuality (status and conduct) were consolidated into a single model in which homosexual identity could be deduced from homosexual acts. Federal officials and the courts initially treated homosexuality as a form of conduct, most commonly deporting homosexual aliens for having committed crimes of moral turpitude. Later, these same government entities relied on status provisions, deporting immigrants charged with homosexuality as aliens “afflicted with psychopathic personality.” While the “psychopathic personality” terminology supported the notion that the homosexual was a kind of person rather than a set of behaviors, it also depended upon psychiatrists to support the claim that homosexuals were by definition psychopathic. When many psychiatrists distanced themselves from that idea, the government refused psychiatric opinion that differentiated psychopaths from homosexuals by arguing that these terms connoted legal-political rather than medicalized identity categories. While this conception arose out of a conservative impulse by immigration officials and the courts to fix homosexuality as identity so that it could be regulated (by bureaucrats rather than psychiatrists), I argue that the emphasis on legal-political identity categories licensed a conception of the homosexual as a kind of citizen that had some emancipatory as well as repressive effects.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , Spring 2003 , pp. 351 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Baxter, Randolph. 1999. “Eradicating This Menace”: Homophobia and Anti-Communism in Congress, 1947–55. Ph. D. diss., University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Bogatin, Marc. 1981. The Immigration and Nationality Act and the Exclusion of Homosexuals: Boutilier v. INS Revisited. Cardoza Law Review 2: 359–96.Google Scholar
Byrne, Thomas Jr., and Francis, Mulligan. 1967. Psychopathic Personality and Sexual Deviation: Medical Terms or Legal Catch Alls–Analysis of the Status of the Homosexual Alien. Temple Law Quarterly 40: 328–47.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George Jr. 1994. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George Jr. 2002. A Different West Side Story: Latino Gay Culture and Urban Politics in Postwar New York. Lecture delivered 15 February, at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Cory, Donald Webster. 1951. The Homosexual in America: A Subjective Approach. New York: Greenberg.Google Scholar
Cuordileone, K. A. 2000. Politics in an Age of Anxiety: Cold War Political Culture and the Crisis of American Masculinity, 1949–1960. Journal of American History 87: 515–45.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John. 1992. The Homosexual Menace: The Politics of Sexuality in Cold War America. In Making Trouble: Essays on Gay History, Politics, and the University, 57–73. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William Jr. 1999. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gerstle, Gary. 1994. The Protean Character of American Liberalism. American Historical Review 99: 1043–73.Google Scholar
Grob, Gerald. 1991. From Asylum to Community: Mental Health Policy in Modern America. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. 1999. A Reader's Guide to the Military's Anti-Gay Policy. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harms, Brian C. 2001. Redefining Crimes of Moral Turpitude: A Proposal to Congress. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 15: 259–89.Google Scholar
Johnson, David K. 2000. The Lavender Scare: Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Civil Service, 1945–1975. Ph. D. diss., Department of History. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kraut, Alan. 1994. Silent Travelers: Germs, Genes, and the “Immigrant Menace.” Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
LeMay, Michael. 1987. From Dutch Door to Open Door: An Analysis of U. S. Immigration Policy Since 1820. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Luibheid, Eithne. 1998. Looking Like a Lesbian: The Organization of Sexual Monitoring at the United States-Mexican Border. Journal of the History of Sexuality 8: 477–506.Google Scholar
Masters, R. E. I. 1962. The Homosexual Revolution: A Candid and Unbiased Appraisal of an Organized Minority Which Threatens to Become a Powerful Social and Political Force. New York: Belmont Books.Google Scholar
May, Elaine Tyler. 1999. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Minter, Shannon. 1993. Sodomy and Morality Offenses Under U. S. Immigration Law: Penalizing Lesbian and Gay Identity. Cornell International Law Journal 26: 771–818.Google Scholar
Minton, Henry. 2002. Departing from Deviance: A History of Homosexual Rights and Emancipatory Science in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Joyce, and Deb, Price. 2001. Courting Justice: Gay Men and Lesbians v. the Supreme Court. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ngai, Mae. 2001. Making and Unmaking Illegal Aliens: Deportation Policy and the Production of U. S. Nation-State Territoriality, 1920–1930. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Legal History, 9 November, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Public Health Service. 1918. Manual for the Mental Examination of Aliens. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sedlak, Eric. 1984. Nemetz v. INS: The Rights of Gay Aliens under the Constitutional Requirement of Uniformity and Mutable Standards of Moral Turpitude. International Law and Politics 16: 881–912.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U. S. History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Szasz, Thomas. 1963. Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry: An Inquiry into the Social Uses of Mental Health. New York: McMillian.Google Scholar
Terry, Jennifer. 1999. An American Obsession: Science, Medicine, and Homosexuality in Modern Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Time Magazine. 1958. What Is a Homosexual? 16 June, p. 44.Google Scholar
Trelles, O., and Bailey, J. 1979. Immigration and Nationality Acts, Legislative Histories, and Related Documents. Buffalo, N. Y.: Hein.Google Scholar
U. S. House. 1952. Revising the Laws Relating to Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality. 82d Cong., 2d. sess. H. Rept. 1365.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. 1950. The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States. 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Rept. 1515.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. 1952. Revision of Immigration and Naturalization Laws. 82d Cong., 2d sess. S. Rept. 1137.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate and U. S. House. 1951. Joint Hearings Before Subcommittees of Committees of Judiciary. Revision of Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality Laws. 82d Cong., 1st sess.Google Scholar

Cases

Babouris v. Esperdy, 269 F.2d 621 (2d Cir. 1959).Google Scholar
Babouris v. Murff, 175 F. Supp 503 (S.D.N.Y. 1958).Google Scholar
Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 360 F.2d 488 (2d Cir. 1966); 387 U.S. 118 (1967).Google Scholar
Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1967. Supreme Court Records and Briefs.Google Scholar
Fleuti v. Rosenberg, 302 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1962).Google Scholar
Ganduxe y Marino v. Esperdy, 278 F.2d 330 (2d Cir. 1960).Google Scholar
Ganduxe y Marino v. Esperdy. 1960. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Ganduxe y Marino v. Murff, 183 F. Supp 565 (D.N.Y. 1959).Google Scholar
Ganduxe y Marino v. Murff. 1959. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
In Re Schmidt, 56 Mise. 2d 456 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1968).Google Scholar
Jordon v. DeGeorge, 341 U.S. 223 (1951).Google Scholar
Lavoie v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 360 F.2d (9th Cir. 1966); 418 F.2d 732 (9th Cir. 1969).Google Scholar
Lavoie v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1966. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Matter of Alfonso-Bermudez. 1967. 28 I & N Dec. 275.Google Scholar
Matter of Fleuti. 1965. 26 I. & N. Dec. 308.Google Scholar
Matter of G. R. 1953. 14 I. &. N. Dec. 18.Google Scholar
Matter of J. 1946. 7 1. & N. Dec. 533.Google Scholar
Matter of K. 1949. 10 I. &. N. Dec. 575.Google Scholar
Matter of LaRochelle. 1965. 26 I. & N. Dec. 436.Google Scholar
Matter of Lavoie. 1968. 29 I. & N. Dec. 224.Google Scholar
Matter of S. 1959. 20 I. & N. Dec. 409.Google Scholar
Ng Sui Wing v. United States, 46 F. 2d 755 (7th Cir. 1931).Google Scholar
Quiroz v. Neelly, 291 F.2d 906 (5th Cir. 1961).Google Scholar
Quiroz v. Neelly. 1961. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963).Google Scholar
Rosenberg v. Fleuti. 1963. Supreme Court Records and Briefs.Google Scholar
Tovar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 368 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1966).Google Scholar
Tovar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1966. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
United States v. Flores-Rodriguez, 237. F.2d. (2d Cir. 1956).Google Scholar
United States v. Flores-Rodriguez. 1956. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Wyngaard v. Kennedy, 295 F.2d 184 (D.C. Cir. 1961).Google Scholar
Wyngaard v. Kennedy. 1961. Trial Records at the National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Wyngaard v. Rogers, 187 F. Supp. 527 (D.D.C 1960).Google Scholar