Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:17:10.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Laura Kalman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on the 25th Anniversary of Horwitz's Transformation I
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2003 , pp. 1149 - 1155
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Morris. 1977. Book Review. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 125: 241–50.Google Scholar
Blackmar, Charles. 1978. Book Review. Saint Louis University Law Journal 22: 228–32.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Max. 1977. Book Review. Vanderbilt Law Review 30: 1102–07.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel. 1993. The Critical Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. Yale Law Journal 101: 1019–76.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1977. Get A Lawyer! New York Review of Books. 14 April, 37.Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene. 1978. Book Review. Harvard Law Review 91: 726–36.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36: 57–125.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 2002. Morton Horwitz and His Critics: A Conflict of Narratives. Tulsa Law Review 37: 915–27.Google Scholar
Gutman, Herbert. 1983. No title. In Visions of History, ed. Abelove, Henry, and Thompson, E. P., 187–216. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F. D. R. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Holt, Wythe. 1982. Morton Horwitz and the Transformation of American Legal History. William and Mary Law Review 23: 663–723.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1971. The Emergence of an Instrumental Conception of American Law, 1780-1820. Perspectives in American History 5: 287–326.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1973. The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. American Journal of Legal History 17: 275–94.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1975. The Rise of Legal Formalism. American Journal of Legal History 19: 251–64.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1977. Book Review. Yale Law Journal 86: 561–66.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1999. The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. Willard. 1977. Book Review. American Journal of Legal History 21: 175–79.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 2002. Transformations. Tulsa Law Review 37: 849–56.Google Scholar
Karsten, Peter. 1997. Heart Versus Head: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kettner, James. 1977. Book Review. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8: 390–92.Google Scholar
McClain, Charles. 1980. Legal Change and Class Interests: A Review Essay on Morton Horwitz's Transformation of American Law. California Law Review 68: 382–97.Google Scholar
Moglen, Eben. 1993. The Transformation of Morton Horwitz. Columbia Law Review 93: 1042–59.Google Scholar
Newmyer, Kent. 1977. Book Review. American Historical Review 82: 1067–68.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen. 1977 Revising the Conservative Tradition: Towards A New American Legal History. New York University Law Review 52: 700–25.Google Scholar
Kathryn, Preyer. 1978. Book Review. Journal of American History 64: 1099–1121.Google Scholar
Reid, John. 1977. A Plot Too Doctrinaire. Texas Law Review 55: 1307–21.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiber, Harry. 1977. Back to “The Legal Mind”? Doctrinal Analysis and the History of the Law. Reviews in American History 5: 458–66.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary. 1981. Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth-Century America: A Reinterpretation. Yale Law Journal 90: 1717–75.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. 1980. The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts. University of Chicago Law Review 46: 533–601.Google Scholar
Teachout, Peter. 1978. Light in Ashes: The Problem of “Respect for the Rule of Law” in American Legal History. New York University Law Review 53: 241–88.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1978. A Marxist Interpretation of American Law. Marxist Perspectives 1: 96–116.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1983. Critical Legal Studies: An Introduction to Its Origin and Underpinnings. Journal of Legal Education 36: 505–17.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1993. Transforming History in the Postmodern Era. Michigan Law Review 91: 1315–52.Google Scholar