Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:15:41.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Too Many Black Men: The Sentencing Judge's Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Doris Marie Provine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legal reform sometimes has unanticipated, even ironic, results. A good example is federal legislation adopted in the 1980s that was supposed to enhance equity in sentencing. Congress, like many state legislatures in this period, reduced judicial control over sentencing by adopting presumptive sentencing guidelines for all serious criminal offenses and mandatory sentences for some specific crimes. Reformers did succeed in reducing judicial discretion in the sentencing process, but racial disparities have gotten much worse. Unprecedented numbers of minorities, particularly black men, are going to jail for long terms. The situation leaves trial judges in a difficult position. They are legally bound to implement a sentencing regime that many of them believe is racially discriminatory. Herbert Jacob's work on criminal trial courts provides a framework for investigating this problem. As Jacob's organizational approach predicts, judges were initially more troubled by the diminution of their powers than by the emerging pattern of increased minority incarceration. Nevertheless, some judges have criticized the racial implications of the sentencing law, protesting in various, resourceful ways. Judicial resistance to a law on moral grounds, though rare, is significant because it represents a break in the ranks of officialdom that enhances the moral credibility of critics of the current law.

Type
Symposium: Special Issue in Honor of Herbert Jacob
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , Fall 1998 , pp. 823 - 856
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Administrative Office of U.S. Courts. 1997. Congress Focuses on Judicial Activism and Related Legislation. Third Branch 29 (5).Google Scholar
Allen, Francis A. 1981. The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barrow, Deborah J., Zuk, Gary, and Gryski, Gerard S. 1996. The Federal Judiciary and Institutional Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Dan. 1996. Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Berkman, Harvey. 1997. Spiking Judges for Rulings: GOP Leaders Threaten to Impeach, Filter Nominees and Clip Courts' Latitude. National Law Journal, 30 June, A1, A11.Google Scholar
Biskupic, Joan. 1997. Court Rejects Bias Claim in Crack Cocaine Sentencing. Washington Post 15 April, A1.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred. 1993. Racial Disproportionality of US Prison Populations Revisited. University of Colorado Law Review 64:743–60.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Abraham. 1967. Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Bourgois, Philippe. 1995. In Search of Respect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cabranes, José. 1992. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Dismal Failure. Remarks at the University of Chicago Law School, 15 January (on file with the author).Google Scholar
Chambliss, William J. 1995. Crime Control and Ethnic Minorities: Legitimizing Racial Oppression by Creating Moral Panics. In Ethnicity, Race, and Crime: Perspectives across Time and Place, ed. Darnell Hawkins, F. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Church Groups Use Pressure Tactics in Drug Fight. 1997. New York Times, 23 June, A10.Google Scholar
Coalition for Federal Sentencing Reform. 1997. The Case for Reform. http://www.sentencing.com.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1975. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Curtin, John T. 1997. Why a Federal Judge Concludes Drug Legalization Is the Way to Go. Buffalo News, 2 March.Google Scholar
Donziger, Steven R., ed. 1996. The Real War on Crime: The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, James, and Herbert Jacob (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Federal Judicial Center. 1992. Survey of United States Judges. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Frankel, Marvin E. 1992. Keynote Address: Sentencing Guidelines: A Need for Creative Collaboration. Yale Law Journal 101:2043–51.Google Scholar
Freed, Daniel J. 1992. Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers. Yale Law Journal 101:1681–1754.Google Scholar
Gordon, Diana R. 1994. The Return of the Dangerous Classes: Drug Prohibition and Policy Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Heany, Gerald W. 1992. Revisiting Disparity: Debating Guidelines Sentencing. American Criminal Law Review 29:771–94.Google Scholar
Huemann, Milton, and Loftin, Colin. 1979. Mandatory Sentencing and the Abolition of Plea Bargaining: The Michigan Felony Firearm Statute. Law and Society Review 13:393–430.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1997. The Governance of Trial Judges. Law and Society Review 31:3–30.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard Kritzer, Herbert, Provine, Doris Marie, and Sanders, Joseph. 1996. Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Molly Treadway, and Scott, A. Gilbert. 1997. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Results of the Federal Judicial Center's 1996 Survey. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, Nicolas de B. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society: A Report by the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Edward. 1992. Foreword. American Criminal Law Review 29:768–70.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1994. Criminal Law and Racial Discrimination. Harvard Law Review 107:126–70.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, Crime, and the Law. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kozol, Jonathan. 1995. Amazing Grace: The Lives of Children and the Conscience of a Nation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kruse, Katherine R. 1997. Remedial Paralysis in the Burger Court: The Lost Struggle against Racism in the Death Penalty. Paper delivered at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, St. Louis, June.Google Scholar
Lavell, Marianne. 1997. Punishment, Citizen-Style. National Law Journal, 3 April, A12.Google Scholar
Lay, Donald P. 1992. Rethinking the Guidelines: A Call for Cooperation. Yale Law Journal 101:1755–71.Google Scholar
Lowney, Knoll D. 1994 Smoked Not Snorted: Is Racism Inherent in Our Crack Cocaine Laws Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 45:121–71.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc. 1997. Race and Class in Sentencing: An Interview with Marc Mauer. Long Term View [Massachusetts School of Law] 4:60–65.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc, and Huling, Tracy. 1995. Young Black Americans and the Criminal Justice System: Five Years Later. Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Meierhoefer, Barbara S. 1992a. The General Effect of Mandatory Minimum Prison Terms: A Longitudinal Study. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Meierhoefer, Barbara S. 1992b. The Role of Offense and Offender Characteristics in Federal Sentencing. Southern California Law Review 66:367–97.Google Scholar
Mieczkowski, Thomas M. 1996. The Prevalence of Drug Use in the United States. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 20:349–414.Google Scholar
Miller, Jerome G. 1996. Search and Destroy: African-American Males in the Criminal Justice System. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mustard, David. 1998. Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts. University of Georgia Economics Working Paper 97–458.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ilene H., and Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1992. A Tale of Three Cities: An Empirical Study of Charging and Bargaining Practices under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Southern California Law Review 66:501–66.Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J. Jr. 1988. The Death of Discretion? Reflections on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Harvard Law Review 101:1938–60.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. 191. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rand, Michael R., and Lynch, James P. 1997. Crime Victimization, 1973–95. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Reeves, Jimmie L., and Campbell, Richard. 1994. Cracked Coverage: Television News, the Anti-Cocaine Crusade, and the Reagan Legacy. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Jack K. 1997. Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin: Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six U.S. Cities. Washington, D.C.: Office of National Drug Control Policy.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, William W. 1992. Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimums: Mixing Apples and Oranges. Southern California Law Review 66:405–11.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert C. 1996. Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Standen, Jeffrey. 1993. Plea Bargaining in the Shadow of the Guidelines. Califomia Law Rev. 81:1471–1538.Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Koh, Steve Y. 1993. The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Wake Forest Law Review 28:223–90.Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Cabranes, José. 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C., and Edelman, Lauren B. 1996. Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law and Social Inquiry 21 (4): 903–42.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 1993. The Success of Judge Frankel's Sentencing Commission. University of Colorado Law Review 64:713–22.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 1995. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael, and Hatlestad, Kathleen, eds. 1997. Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uelemen, Gerald F. 1992. Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Cure Worse than the Disease. American Criminal Law Review 29:899–905.Google Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffrey T. 1997. Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities under Sentencing Guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 1990. Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 1997. Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 1995. Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. Special Report to the Congress, February.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 1996. Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 1997. Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. Special Report to the Congress, April.Google Scholar
Washington Post. 1996. Investigative series. October, A10-A12.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1997. The Climates of Disbelief. Nation, 16 June, 10.Google Scholar
Wren, Christopher S. 1997. Reno and Top Drug Official Urge Smaller Gap in Cocaine Sentences. New York Times, 22 July, A1, A12.Google Scholar

Cases

Armstrong v, United States, - U.S. - (1997).Google Scholar
Callins v. United States, - US.- (1994).Google Scholar
Greg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).Google Scholar
Hamelin w. Michigan, 501 US. 957 (1991).Google Scholar
Hutto v. Davis, 454 US. 370 (1982).Google Scholar
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).Google Scholar
Mistretta w. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1989).Google Scholar
State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 886 (Minn. 1991).Google Scholar
United States w. Angulo-Lopez, 7 F.3d 1506 (10th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar
United States w. Bethancurt, 692 F. Supp. 1427 (D.D.C. 1988).Google Scholar
United States v. Booker, 70 F.3d 964 (1995).Google Scholar
United States v. Buchanon, 909 F. Supp. 99 (N.D.N.Y. 1995).Google Scholar
Unites States v. Clary, 846 F. Supp. 768 (S.D. Mo. 1994), reversed and remanded, 34Google Scholar
United States w. Davis, 864 F. Supp. 1303 (N.D. Ga. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Dumas, 64 F.3rd 1427 (9th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
United States v. Fisher, 58 F.3d (4th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
United States w. Frazjer, 981 F.2d 92 (3rd Cir. 1992).Google Scholar
United States v. Haynes, 985 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1993).Google Scholar
United States v. Johnson, 40 F.3rd 436 (D.C.C. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Lattimore, 787 F. Supp. 170 (1991), reversed and remanded, 974 F.2dGoogle Scholar
United States u. Rancher, 941 F. Supp. (1996).Google Scholar
United States v. Shepherd, 857 D.D.C. 1994, remanded, 102 F.3d 558 (D.C. Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Spencer, 817 F. Supp. 176 (D.D.C. 1993).Google Scholar
United States v. Thompson, 27 F.3d 671 (D.C. Cir 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Thompson, 51 F.3d 122 (1995). F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 1994). 971 (8th Cir. 1992)Google Scholar
United States v. Walls, 841 F. Supp. 24 (D.D.C. 1994), reversed, 70 F.3d 1323 (D.C. Cir. 1995).Google Scholar