Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:19:18.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Evaluation Is Not a Serious Alternative to an Independent Study of the American Law Institute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
“From the Trenches and Towers”
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alex, Elson. 1998. The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute. Law and Social Inquiry 23(3):625–40.Google Scholar
Alex, Elson, and Shakman, Michael L. 1996. The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tainted Process and Flawed Product Business Lawyer 49 (Aug.): 1761–92.Google Scholar
Groner, Jonathan. 1996. Insurance Lobby Aims at Normally Staid ALL Legal Times, 10 June, 1, 45.Google Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr. 1998. Reflections. Law and Social Inquiry 23(3):641–49.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1998. Evaluating the American Law Institute: Research Issues and Prospects. Law and Social Inquiry 23(3):667–71.Google Scholar
Rotunda, Ronald D. 1998. Gauging the Impact of the Proposed Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers. Professional Lawyer 9, no. 2 (Feb.): 2, 1113.Google Scholar
Shapo, Marshall S. 1998. Private Organization, Public Responsibilities. Law and Social Inquiry 23(3):651–55.Google Scholar
Zeppos, Nicholas S. 1998. Reforming a Private Legislature: The Maturation of the American Law Institute as a Legislative Body. Law and Social Inquiry 23(3):657–66.Google Scholar