Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:33:39.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resisting the Enforcement of Sexual Harassment Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Justine E. Tinkler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most people in the United States believe that sexual harassment should be illegal and that enforcement is necessary. In spite of such widespread support for antiharassment regulations, sexual harassment policy training provokes backlash and has been shown to activate traditional gender stereotypes. Using in-depth interviews and participant observations of sexual harassment policy training sessions, this study uncovers the micro-level mechanisms that underlie ambivalence about the enforcement of sexual harassment law. I find that while the different locations of men and women in the status hierarchy lead to different manifestations of resistance, gender stereotypes are used to buttress perceptions that sexual harassment laws threaten norms of interaction and status positions that men and women have an interest in maintaining. The research has implications for understanding the role of law in social change, legal compliance, and the potential/limits of law for reducing inequality.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2012 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Kathryn. 1998. The New Jurisprudence of Sexual Harassment. Cornell Law Review 83:1169–1230.Google Scholar
Bisom‐Rapp, Susan. 2001. An Ounce of Prevention Is a Poor Substitute for a Pound of Cure: Confronting the Developing Jurisprudence of Education and Prevention in Employment Discrimination Law. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 22:101–46.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. 1958. Racial Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. Pacific Sociological Review 1:3–7.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, Kluegel, James, and Smith, Ryan A. 1997. Laissez‐Faire Racism: The Crystallization of a Kinder, Gentler, Antiblack Ideology. In Racial Attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and Change, ed. Tuch, Steven A. and Martin, Jack K., 15–42. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Burgess, Diana, and Borgida, Eugene. 1999. Who Women Are, Who Women Should Be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5:665–92.Google Scholar
Correll, Shelley. 2001. Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self‐Assessments. American Journal of Sociology 106:1691–1730.Google Scholar
Dellinger, Kirsten, and Williams, Christine L. 2002. The Locker Room and the Dorm Room: Workplace Norms and the Boundaries of Sexual Harassment in Magazine Editing. Social Problems 49:242–57.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Kelly, Erin L. 2007. How to Stop Harassment: Professional Construction of Legal Compliance in Organizations. American Journal of Sociology 112:1203–43.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology 97:1531–76.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S. 1999. The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology 105:406–54.Google Scholar
England, Paula, Shafer, Emily Fitzgibbons, and Fogarty, Alison C. K. 2008. Hooking Up and Forming Romantic Relationships on Today's College Campuses. In The Gendered Society Reader, ed. Kimmel, Michael and Aronson, Amy, 531–47. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, Saute, Robert, Oglensky, Bonnie, and Gever, Martha. 1995. Glass Ceilings and Open Doors: Women's Advancement in the Legal Profession. Fordham Law Review 291:291–3449.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 1998. Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, 357–411. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Giuffre, Patti, and Williams, Christine. 1994. Boundary Lines: Labeling Sexual Harassment in Restaurants. Gender & Society 8:378–401.Google Scholar
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan T. 1996. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:491–512.Google Scholar
Grazian, D. 2007. The Girl Hunt: Urban Nightlife and the Performance of Masculinity as Collective Activity. Symbolic Interaction 30:221–43.Google Scholar
Gruber, James. 1998. The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment. Gender & Society 12:301–20.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. 2002. Sexuality Harassment. In Left Legalism/Left Critique, ed. Brown, Wendy and Halley, Janet, 80–104. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hinze, Susan. 2004. “Am I Being Over‐Sensitive?” Women's Experience of Sexual Harassment during Medical Training. Health 8:101–27.Google Scholar
Holstein, James A., and Gubrium, Jaber F. 1995. The Active Interviewer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary, and Muha, Michael. 1984. Education and Intergroup Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement. American Sociological Review 49:751–69.Google Scholar
Kane, Emily W., and Macaulay, Laura. 1993. Interviewer Gender and Gender Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 57:1–28.Google Scholar
Lonsway, Kimberly A., Cortina, Lilia M., and Magley, Vicki J. 2008. Sexual Harassment Mythology: Definition, Conceptualization, and Measurement. Sex Roles 58:599–615.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, Catherine. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna Maria. 2003. Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry 28:659–89.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna Maria. 2005. Idle Rights: Employees' Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies. Law & Society Review 39:83–123.Google Scholar
McCabe, Marita, and Hardman, Lisa. 2005. Attitudes and Perceptions of Workers to Sexual Harassment. Journal of Social Psychology 145:719–40.Google Scholar
Mendes, Wendy Berry, Blascovich, Jim, Hunter, Sarah B., Lickel, Brian, and Jost, John T. 2007. Threatened by the Unexpected: Physiological Responses during Social Interactions with Expectancy‐Violating Partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92:698–716.Google Scholar
Munkres, Susan. 2008. Claiming “Victim” to Harassment Law: Legal Consciousness of the Privileged. Law & Social Inquiry 33:447–72.Google Scholar
Montemurro, Beth. 2003. Not a Laughing Matter: Sexual Harassment as “Material” on Workplace‐Based Situation Comedies. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 48:433–45.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law & Society Review 34:1055–90.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Biem, Aaron. 2004. Media Misrepresentation: Title VII, Print Media, and Public Perceptions of Discrimination Litigation. Stanford Law & Policy Review 15:101–30.Google Scholar
Ohse, Dawn M., and Stockdale, Margaret S. 2008. Age Comparisons in Workplace Sexual Harassment Perceptions. Sex Roles 59:240–53.Google Scholar
Pascoe, C. J. 2007. Dude, You're a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Patai, Daphne. 1998. Heterophobia: Sexual Harassment and the Politics of Purity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Quinn, Beth. 2000. The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor, and Harassment of the Everyday Work World. Law & Social Inquiry 25: 1151–85.Google Scholar
Quinn, Beth. 2002. Sexual Harassment and Masculinity: The Power and Meaning of “Girl‐Watching.” Gender & Society 16:386–402.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia. 1997. Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment. American Sociological Review 62:218–35.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2006. Gender as an Organizing Force in Social Relations: Implications for the Future of Inequality. In The Declining Significance of Gender? ed. Blau, Francine, Brinton, Mary, and Grusky, David, 265–88. New York: Russell Sage Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia, and Correll, Shelley. 2004. Motherhood as a Status Characteristic. Journal of Social Issues 60:683–700.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia, and Smith‐Lovin, Lynn. 1999. The Gender System and Interaction. Annual Review of Sociology 25:191–216.Google Scholar
Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D., and Sackett, P. R. 2001. A Meta‐Analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:914–22.Google Scholar
Russell, Brenda, and Trigg, Kristin. 2004. Tolerance of Sexual Harassment: An Examination of Gender Differences, Ambivalent Sexism, Social Dominance, and Gender Roles. Sex Roles 50:565–73.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail. 2003. What is Sexual Harassment? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 1998. Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment. Yale Law Journal 107:1683–1732.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 2003. The Sanitized Workplace. Yale Law Journal 112 (8): 2061–2194.Google Scholar
Sewell, William F. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.Google Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, Pratto, Felicia, and Bobo, Lawrence. 1996. Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:476–90.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Terrance, Cheryl, Logan, Amie, and Peters, Douglas. 2004. Perceptions of Peer Sexual Harassment Among High School Students. Sex Roles 51:479–90.Google Scholar
Tinkler, Justine E. 2007. A Social Psychological Analysis of Resistance to Sexual Harassment Law: Implications for Equal Opportunity. PhD diss., Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Tinkler, Justine E. 2008. “People Are Too Quick to Take Offense”: The Effects of Legal Information and Beliefs on Definitions of Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry 33:417–45.Google Scholar
Tinkler, Justine E., Li, Yan, and Mollborn, Stefanie. 2007. Can Legal Interventions Change Beliefs? The Effect of Exposure to Sexual Harassment Policy on Men's Gender Beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly 70:480–94.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, and Blackstone, Amy. 2004. Sexual Harassment as a Gendered Expression of Power. American Sociological Review 69:64–92.Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2009. Sexual Harassment Charges EEOC & FEPA Combined. http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm (accessed July 21, 2010).Google Scholar
US Merit Systems Protection Board. 1995. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.Google Scholar
Wiener, Richard, Hurt, Linda, Russell, Brenda, Mannen, Kelley, and Gasper, Charles. 1997. Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Effects of Gender, Legal Standard, and Ambivalent Sexism. Law and Human Behavior 21:71–93.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine, and Heikes, Joel. 1993. The Importance of Researcher's Gender in the In‐Depth Interview: Evidence from Two Case Studies of Male Nurses. Gender & Society 7:280–91.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, and Hawkins, Gordon. 1971. The Legal Threat as an Instrument of Social Change. Journal of Social Issues 27:33–48.Google Scholar