Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:45:20.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property and the Obligation to Support the Conditions of Human Flourishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Menachem Mautner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

American rights discourse makes it difficult to generate responsibilities for the well-being of the communities within which human personhood is formed. Gregory S. Alexander’s Property and Human Flourishing (2018) focuses on the obligations that property owners owe to the communities in which they are embedded. Drawing on a communitarian ontology—as opposed to atomist ontology—and writing in the spirit of Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and thinkers of the liberalism of flourishing, Alexander endorses human flourishing as the central ideal of the good life, and argues that ownership of property is justified insofar as it facilitates the opportunity of persons to live flourishing lives.

Type
Review Symposium: Law and Society Meets Jurisprudence
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 521 - 538
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, David. “Are Rights the Right Thing? Individual Rights, Communitarian Purposes and America’s Problems.” Connecticut Law Review 25 (1993): 947–65.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S.The Global Debate over Constitutional Property: Lessons for American Takings Jurisprudence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S.. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law.” Cornell Law Review 94, no. 4 (2009): 745–820.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S.. Property and Human Flourishing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., and Peñalver, Eduardo M., eds. Property and Community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., and Peñalver, Eduardo M., eds. An Introduction to Property Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., Peñalver, Eduardo M., Singer, Joseph William, and Underkuffler, Laura S.. “Property and Obligation: A Statement of Progressive Property.” Cornell Law Review 94, no. 4 (2009): 743–44.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth.Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S.The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda. “Autonomy and the Social Self.” In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, 52–71. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Martin. “Book Review: Norms of Liberty: A Perfectionist Base for Non-Perfectionist Politics.” Philosophical Books 48, no. 1 (2007): 92–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre.The Social Structures of the Economy. Translated by Turner, Chris. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2005.Google Scholar
Braudo-Bahat, Yael. “Towards a Relational Conceptualization of the Right to Personal Autonomy.” American University Journal of Gender Social Policy and Law 25, no. 2 (2017): 111–54.Google Scholar
Bruford, Walter Horace.The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Ernest. “Horizontal Rights and Chinese Constitutionalism: Judicialization through Labor Disputes.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 88, no. 1 (2012): 63–91.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew.Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Robert M. “Forward: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M.. “Obligation: A Jewish Jurisprudence of the Social Order.” Journal of Law & Religion 5, no. 1 (1987): 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. “The Social Responsibility of Ownership.” Cornell Law Review 92, no. 6 (2007): 1255–74.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch.. Property. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch.. “Markets for Self-Authorship.” Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 27, no. 3 (2018): 577–600.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Dorfman, Avihay. “Just Relationships.” Columbia Law Review 116, no. 6 (2016): 1395–1460.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Dorfman, Avihay. “Interpersonal Human Rights.” Cornell International Law Journal 51, no. 2 (2018): 361–90.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Heller, Michael. The Choice Theory of Contract. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Dahan, Yossi, Lerner, Hanna, and Milman-Sivan, Faina. “Shared Responsibility and the International Labour Organization.” Michigan Journal of International Law 34, no. 4 (2013): 675–743.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir.Rights, Persons, and Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Melvin A. “Disclosure in Contract Law.” California Law Review 91 (2003): 1645–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisse, Brent. “Book Review: Rights, Persons and Organizations: A Legal Theory for Bureaucratic Society.” UNSW Law Journal 10 (1987): 295–301.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Dauter, Luke. “The Sociology of Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 33 (2007): 105–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Truth and Method. 2d Revised Edition. Translated by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum, 1960, 1993.Google Scholar
Galston, Willian A.Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Grant.The Death of Contract. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J., Sabel, Charles F., and Scott, Robert E.. “Braiding: The Interaction of Formal and Informal Contracting in Theory, Practice, and Doctrine.” Columbia Law Review 110, no. 6 (2010): 1377–1447.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J., Sabel, Charles F., and Scott, Robert E.. “Text and Context: Contract Interpretation as Contract Design.” Cornell Law Review 100, no. 1 (2014): 23–98.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk. New York: The Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3 (1985): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Thomas Hill.Prolegomena to Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1883, 2003.Google Scholar
Griffin, James.Well-Being. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. “Republicanism.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip, 568–74 Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 26 (1917): 710–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J.The Transformation of American Law 1780–1860. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Klosko, George. “Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 23, no. 3 (1994): 251–70.Google Scholar
Kreitner, Roy. “Frameworks of Cooperation: Competing, Conflicting and Joined Interests in Contract and its Surroundings.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 6, no. 1 (2005a): 59–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitner, Roy.. “Multiplicity in Contract Remedies.” In Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract. Edited by Cohen, Nili and McKendrick, Ewan, 19–50. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005b.Google Scholar
Kreitner, Roy.. Calculating Promises– The Emergence of Modern American Contract Doctrine. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kreitner, Roy.. “On the New Pluralism in Contract Theory.” Suffolk University Law Review 45 (2012): 915–33.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T.Confessions of a Born-Again Pagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. “Community.: In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip, 366–78 Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Labrode, Cécile, and John, Maynor, eds. Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. “Some Realism about Realism– Responding to Dean Pound.” Harvard Law Review 44, no. 8 (1930–1931): 1222–64.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.. “Through Title to Contract and a Bit Beyond.” New York University Law Quarterly Review 15, no. 2 (1938): 159–209.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.. “Across Sales on Horseback.” Harvard Law Review 52, no. 5 (1939a): 725–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.. “The First Struggle to Unhorse Sales.” Harvard Law Review 52, no. 6 (1939b): 873–904.10.2307/1334183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.. “Our Case-Law of Contract: Offer and Acceptance, II.” Yale Law Journal 48, no. 5 (1939c): 779–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N.. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1960.Google Scholar
Lubens, Rebecca. “The Social Obligation of Property Ownership: A Comparison of German and U.S. Law.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 24, no. 2 (2007): 389–449.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stuart. “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” American Sociological Review 28, no. 1 (1963): 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “On ‘Democratic Liberty: Essays in Retrieval’ by C.B. Macpherson.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 no. 2 (1976): 177–81.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair.. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1985.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair.. “Justice as Virtue: Changing Conceptions.” In Communitarianism and Individualism. Edited by Avineri, Shlomo and De-Shalit, Avner, 51–64. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie, eds. Relational Autonomy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “On the Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader. Edited by Tucker, Robert C.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 24–52. 1844, 2d ed., 1978.Google Scholar
Mautner, Menachem.Human Flourishing, Liberal Theory, and the Arts. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, and Smith, Henry E.. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle.” Yale Law Journal 110, no. 1 (2000): 1–70.10.2307/797586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, and Smith, Henry E.. “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?” Yale Law Journal 111 (2001): 357–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Henry.Sweden: Social Democracy in Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover.” Yale Law Journal 96, no. 8 (1987): 1860–1915.10.2307/796400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirow, M.C. “The Social-Obligation Norm of Property: Duguit, Hayem, and Others.” Florida Journal of International Law 22 (2010): 191–226.Google Scholar
Morgan-Foster, Jason. “Third Generation Rights: What Islamic Law Can Teach the International Human Rights Movement.” Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2005): 67–116.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. “Right v. Duties: Reclaiming Civic Balance.” Boston Review (May 16, 2016).Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. “Reconceiving Rights as Relationship.” Review of Constitutional Studies 1, no. 1 (1993): 1–26.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer.. Law’s Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Capabilities and Human Rights.” Fordham Law Review 66, no. 2 (1997): 273–300.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.. Creating Capabilities– The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.10.4159/harvard.9780674061200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek.Reasons and Persons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Michael. “Review: The Politics of Rights: Then and Now.” Law & Social Inquiry 31, no. 4 (2006): 999–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip.Republicanism– A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Douglas B. and Den Uyl, Douglas J.. Norms of Liberty. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. “Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility.” Yale Law Journal 111 (2001): 443–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John.. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rawls, John.. “The Basic Structure as Subject.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1997): 159–65.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Right-Based Moralities.” In Theories of Rights. Edited by Waldron, Jeremy, 182–200. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 1984a.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph.. “On the Nature of Rights.” Mind XCIII (1984b): 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph.. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur.Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur.. Private Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. “Republicanism: The Career of a Concept.” The Journal of American History 79, no. 1 (1992): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael.Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. “Value, Desire, and Quality of Life.” In The Quality of Life. Edited by Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya, 185–200. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1993.10.1093/0198287976.003.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. “Relationships and Responsibilities.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 26 no. 3 (1997): 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A.The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carl E. “Rights Discourse and Neonatal Euthanasia.” California Law Review 76, no. 1 (1988): 151–76.10.2307/3480499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Robert. “The Promise and the Perils of Relational Contract Theory.” In Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay: On the Empirical and the Lyrical. Edited by Braucher, Jean, Kidwell, John and Whitford, William C., 105–39. Oxford, UK and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards a New Market-Embedded Morality?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9, no. 2 (2008a): 371–94.10.2202/1565-3404.1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, Ronen.. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy & Society 37, no. 1 Economy & Society (2008b): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital. “T. H. Green’s Community of Rights: An Essay on the Complexity of Liberalism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 8 no. 3 (2003): 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, William H. “Social-Republican Property.” UCLA Law Review 38 (1991): 1335–1413.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. “The Legal Rights Debate in Analytical Jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld.” Wisconsin Law Review 1982 (1982): 975–1059.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William.;. “The Ownership Society and Takings of Property: Castles, Investments and Just Obligations.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 30 (2006): 309–38.Google Scholar
Sorkin, David. “Wilhelm von Humboldt: The Theory and Practice of Self-Formation (Bildung), 1791–1810.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 no. 1 (1983): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “Atomism.” In Communitarianism and Individualism. Edited by Avineri, Shlomo and De-, AvnerShalit, 29–50. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles.. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “An Essay on Rights.” Texas Law Review 62, no. 8 (1984): 1363–403.Google Scholar
Underkuffler, Laura S. “On Property: An Essay.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1990): 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio.Republicanism. Translated by Shugaar, Antony. New York: Hill and Wang, 1999.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “Liberalism and the Art of Separation.” Political Theory 12, no. 3 (1984): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J.Corrective Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J.. The Idea of Private Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. “Lives in the Law: Murdering the Spirit: Racism, Rights, and Commerce.” Michigan Law Review 90 (1992): 1771–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Patricia J.The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. “Looking at Our Language: Glendon on Rights.” Michigan Law Review 90, no. 6 (1992): 1267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CASES CITED

Reed v. King, 145 Cal. App. 3d 261, 193 Cal. Rptr. 130 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983).Google Scholar
Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991).Google Scholar
Strawn v. Canuso, 140 N.J. 43, 65 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1995).Google Scholar
Tobin v. Papparone Construction Co., 137 N.J. Super 517 (Law Div. 1995).Google Scholar

OTHER SOURCES

Restatement Contracts Second.Google Scholar