Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:09:48.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor, and Harassment in the Everyday Work World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Beth A. Quinn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the question of women's seeming rejection of sexual harassment law by refusing to apply the label “sexual harassment” in the face of incidents that would easily qualify as such. Building on the work of Bumiller (1988) and the tradition of sociolegal studies focusing on understanding the power of the law in its everyday context (e.g., Merry 1979; Engel 1987; Sarat and Kearns 1993), this analysis explores the “tactical milieu” in which both hostile work environment sexual harassment and tactics for its resistance are produced. Using in-depth interviews with both women and men, the author explores the ways a particular form of hostile work environment harassment–dubbed “chain yanking”–poaches on the realm of ambiguous humor to effect male group solidarity and women's disempowerment. A common countertactic–”not taking it personal”– is analyzed for its simultaneous power as resistance and unwitting collaboration. The contradictory effects of this tactic-countertactic pairing on the naming and claiming of the harm of sexual harassment are examined, as well as the implications this has for combating sexual harassment in the workplace.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , Fall 2000 , pp. 1151 - 1185
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power through Bedouin Women. American Ethnologist 17:41–55.Google Scholar
Bremer, Barbara, Moore, Cathleen T., and Bildersee, Ellen F. 1991. Do You Have to Call It “Sexual Harassment” to Feel Harassed College Student Journal 24 (3): 258–68.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Clair, Robin P. 1993. The Uses of Framing Devices to Sequester Organizational Narratives: Hegemony and Harassment. Communication Monographs 60 (2): 113–36.Google Scholar
Coles, Frances S. 1986. Forced to Quit: Sexual Harassment Complaints and Agency Response. Sex Roles 14:81–95.Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth. 1995. Whores, Fags, Dumb-Ass Women, Surly Blacks, and Competent Heterosexual White Men: The Sexual and Racial Morality Underlying Anti-discrimination Doctrine. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 7:195–225.Google Scholar
Conley, John, and O'Barr, William. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989:139–67.Google Scholar
Dansky, Bonnie S., and Kilpatrick, Dean G. 1997. Effects of Sexual Harassment. In O'Donohue 1997.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. 1987. The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community. Law and Society Review 18:551–82.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan R. 1987. Real Rape. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan R. 1991. Sex at Work. Stanford Law Review 43:813–61.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F. 1974. Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing. Law and Society Review 9:63–94.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 198081. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…. Law and Society Review 15 (3–4): 631–54.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984. The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1976. Obscene Joking across Cultures. Journal of Communication 26:134–40.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1987. One of the Boys: Women in Male-Dominated Settings. In Kimmel 1987.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., and Swan, Suzanne. 1995. Why Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment. Journal of Social Issues 51:117–38.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Bergman, Mindy E., and Hulin, Charles L. 1998. The Psychology and Job-related Consequences of Sexual Coercion in the Workplace. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association. Aspen, Colorado, June 4–7.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, A., Ormerod, A. J., and Weitzman, L. 1988. The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 32:167–77.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Swan, Suzanne, and Magley, Vicki J. 1997. But Was It Really Sexual Harassment? Psychological, Behavioral, and Legal Definitions of Sexual Harassment. In O'Donohue 1997.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings J972-J977. N.Y.: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Giuffre, Patti, and Williams, Christine. 1994 - Boundary Lines: Labeling Sexual Harassment in Restaurants. Gender and Society 8:378–401.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, James. 1989. How Women Handle Sexual Harassment: A Literature Review. Sociology and Social Research 74 (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
Gruber, James. 1990. Methodological Problems and Policy Implications in Sexual Harassment Research. Population Research and Policy Review 9 (3): 235–54.Google Scholar
Gruber, James. 1992. A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 90s. Sex Roles 26 (11–12): 447–64.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara A., and Koss, Mary P. 1993. Changed Women and Changed Organizations: Consequences of and Coping with Sexual Harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 42 (1): 28–48.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara A., and Koss, Mary P. 1994. Gender Differences in Clerical Workers' Disputes Over Tasks, Interpersonal Treatment, and Emotion. Human Relations 47:611–39.Google Scholar
Hemming, Heather. 1985. Women in a Man's World: Sexual Harassment. Human Relations 38 (1): 67–79.Google Scholar
Hesson-McInnis, Matthew, and Fitzgerald, Louise F. 1997. Sexual Harassment: A Preliminary Test of an Integrative Model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27 (10): 877–901.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 1993. The Power of Silence: Social and Pragmatic Perspectives. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Johnson, Miriam. 1988. Strong Mothers, Weak Wives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Pres.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael, ed. 1987. Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Koss, M. P. 1990. Changed Lives: The Psychological Impact of Sexual Harassment. Ivory Power: Sex and Gender Harassment in the Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, Edward, and Tredeau, Leslie. 1986. The Frequency, Sources, and Correlates of Sexual Harassment among Women in Traditional Male Occupations. Sex Roles 15 (7–8): 433–42.Google Scholar
Loe, Meika. 1996. Working for Men-at the Intersection of Power, Gender, and Sexuality. Sociological Inquiry 66 (4): 399–421.Google Scholar
Lyman, Peter. 1987. The Fraternal Bond as a Joking Relationship: A Case Study of the Role of Sexist Jokes in Male Group Bonding. In Kimmel 1987.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1979. The Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1993. Reflections on Law in the Everyday Life of Women. In Sarat and Kearns 1993.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1991. Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on Theory and Its Application. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 11:225–54.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1979. Going to Court: Strategies of Dispute Management in an American Urban Neighborhood. Law and Society Review 13:891–925.Google Scholar
Miller, Laura. 1997. Not Just Weapons of the Weak: Gender Harassment as a Form of Protest for Army Men. Social Psychology Quarterly 60(1):32–51.Google Scholar
Miller, Marjorie. 1992. Ladies and Gentlemen: Hypocrisy, Mystification, and Sexual Harassment. Soundings 75:357–64.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H., and Kornhauser, Lewis. 1979. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. Yale Law Journal 88:950–97.Google Scholar
O'Donohue, William ed. 1997. Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment. N.Y.: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Paludi, Michele, and Barickman, Richard. 1991. Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Manual of Resources. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. 1989. Justice and Gender: Sex Discrimination and the Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Keatns, Thomas, eds. 1993. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Allen, and Kleinman, Sherryl. 1989. Medical Students' Contacts with the Living and the Dead. Social Psychology Quarterly 52(1):56–69.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, Taylor, and Conrad, Charles. 1992. Narratives of Sexual Harassment: Organizational Dimensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research 20 (4): 401–18.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender Play: Girls and Boss in School. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
United States Merit Systems Protection Board. 1988. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government: An Update. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vincent, Joan. 1994. On Law and Hegemonic Moments: Looking Behind the Law in Early Modern Uganda. In Contested States: Law, Hegemony and Resistance, ed. Lazarus-Black, M. and Hirsch, S. F., 118–37 N.Y.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1994. Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective. Signs 19 (3): 713–38.Google Scholar