Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:05:27.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiculturalism and the Willingness of Citizens to Defer to Law and to Legal Authorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Tom R. Tyler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key problem in trying to manage diverse societies is finding social policies that will be acceptable to all individuals and groups. Studies suggest that this problem may not be as intractable as is often believed, since people's acceptance of policies is shaped to an important degree by the fairness of the procedures used by authorities to make policy. When policies are fairly made, they gain widespread support, even among those who may feel that the consequences of the policy for them or their group are undesirable or even unfair. These findings support an optimistic view of the ability of authorities to manage diverse societies. On the other hand, research suggests that the ability of procedural justice to bridge differences among individuals and groups may not be equally strong under all conditions. People's willingness to accept policies is more influenced by procedural justice judgments when they identify with the society that the authorities represent and view them as representing a group of which they are members. They are less influenced by procedural justice judgments when they identify more strongly with subgroups than with society and/or view the authorities as representatives of a group to which they do not belong.

Type
Symposium: Law, Democracy, and Society
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , Fall 2000 , pp. 983 - 1019
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. A., and Verba, S. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. 1984. Cultural Relations in Plural Societies: Alternatives to Segregation and Their Sociopsychological Implications. In Groups in Contact, ed. Miller, N. and Brewer, M., 11–27. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., and Kramer, R. M. 1986. Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size and Decision Framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:543–49.Google Scholar
California. Department of Finance. 1993. Projected Total Population of California Counties: 1990 to 2040. Sacramento: Department of Finance.Google Scholar
Cox, T. 1993. Cultural Diversity in Organizations. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive Justice. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DiPalma, G. 1990. To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dockson, R. R. 1993. Justice in the Balance: Report of the Commission on the Future of the California Courts. San Francisco: Supreme Court of California.Google Scholar
Fullerton, H. N. 1987. Labor Force Projections: 1986–2000. Monthly Labor Review, 19–29.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., and Rust, M. C. 1993. The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. In The European Review of Social Psychology, ed. Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M., 4:1–26. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., and Pomare, M. 1990. How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:692–704.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., and Anastasio, P. A. 1994-The Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias. Small Group Research 22:267–77.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L., and Caldeira, G. A. 1996. The Legal Culture of Europe. Law and Society Review 30:55–86.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L., Duch, R. M., and Tedin, K. L. 1992. Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union. Journal of Politics 54:329–71.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1990. Looking Fair versus Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organizational Justice. Research in Organisational Behavior 12:111–57.Google Scholar
Gurin, P., and Epps, E. 1975. Black Consciousness, Identity and Achievement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. L., and Sanders, J. 1992. Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. 1990. Social Motivation, Self-Esteem and Social Identity. In Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, ed. Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1984 Will More Countries Become Democratic Political Science Quarterly 99:193–218.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J. 1994. Are There Limits to Justice? Exclusionary Effects in Justice Behavior. Master's thesis, University of California–Berkeley.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. 1996. Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separation the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer Psychological Science 7:40–45.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1990. Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. 1991. Global Work Force 2000: The New World Labor Market. Harvard Business Review 69:115–27.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C, and Hamilton, L. 1989. Obedience to Authority. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, J. W. 1993. Is Group Membership a Prerequisite for Group Identification Political Behavior 15:49–60.Google Scholar
Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. 1993. Procedural Fairness and Self-Esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology 21:630–50.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. 1991. Intergroup Relations and Organizational Dilemmas: The Role of Categorization Processes. Research in Organizational Behavior 13:191–228.Google Scholar
LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., and Gerton, J. 1993. The Psychological Impact of Biculturalism: Evidence and Theory. Psychological Bulletin 114:395–412.Google Scholar
Lea, J.A., Smith, H. J., and Tyler, T. R. 1994- Predicting Support for Compensatory Polices: Why, Why and How. Paper on file with author.Google Scholar
Leung, K, and Lind, E. A. 1986. Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:1134–40.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S., and Waters, M. C. 1987. The Location of Racial and Ethnic Groups in the United States. Sociological Forum 2:780–810.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., Huo, Y. J., and Tyler, T. R. 1994- … And Justice for All: Ethnicity, Gender and Preferences for Dispute Resolution Procedures. Law and Human Behavior 18:269–89.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., and de Vera Park, M. V. 1993. Individual and Corporate Dispute Resolution: Using Procedural Fairness as a Decision Heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly 38:224–51.Google Scholar
Markovsky, B. 1985. Multilevel Justice Theory. American Sociological Review 50:822–39.Google Scholar
MacCoun, R. J. 1993. Drugs and the Law: A Psychological Analysis of Drug Prohibition. Psychological Bulletin 113:497–512.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., and Bersoff, D. M. 1992. Culture and Moral Judgment: How Are Conflicts between Justice and Interpersonal Responsibilities Resolved Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:541–54.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M., and Solliday, E. A. 1991. ”Balanced Multiculturalism” and the Challenge of Peaceful Coexistence in Pluralistic Societies. Psychology and Developing Societies 3:51–72.Google Scholar
Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J. J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A., and Kumar, P. 1984- Factors Affecting Allocation to Needy and Meritorious Recipients: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:1267–72.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., and Paternoster, R. 1991. The Preventive Effects of the Perceived Risk of Arrest: Testing an Expanded Conception of Deterrence. Criminology 29:561–85.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. 1990. Deterring Moral Exclusion, Journal of Social Issues 46:173–89.Google Scholar
Ortiz, D. J. 1994- When Do Outcomes Matter? Group Membership, Self-Esteem and Justice Evaluations. Honors thesis, University of California–Berkeley.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R. 1989. Decisions to Participate in and Desist from Four Types of Common Delinquency. Law and Society Review 23:7–40.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, H. L. 1982. Deterring the Drinking Driver: Legal Policy and Social Control. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Roth, J. A., and Scholz, J. T. 1989. Taxpayer Compliance. Vol. 2, Social Science Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Roth, J. A., Scholz, J. T., and Witte, A. D. 1989. Taxpayer Compliance. Vol. 1, An Agenda for Research. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. Z. 1980. Experimental Research on Third-Party Intervention in Conflict: Toward Some Generalizations. Psychological Bulletin 87:379–91.Google Scholar
Scheingold, S. A. 1974. The Politics of Rights. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, A. M. Jr. 1992. The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Smith, H. J., and Tyler, T. R. 1996. Justice and Power: When Will Justice Concerns Encourage the Advantaged to Support Policies Which Redistribute Economic Resources and the Disadvantaged to Willingly Obey the Law European Journal of Social Psychology 26:171–200.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. 1982. Human Groups and Social Categories. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. 1986. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. Worchel, S. Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. M., and Moghaddam, F. M. 1994. Theories of Intergroup Relations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thompson, L., Kray, L., and Lind, E. A. 1994. The Bright and Dark Side of Group Identity. Paper presented at the Annual Society for Experimental Social Psychology Convention, Lake Tahoe, Calif.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., and Wetherell, M. S. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1988. What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures. Law and Society Review 22:301–55.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1994a. Governing Amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decision-Making Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government. Law and Society Review 28:809–31.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1994b. Psychological Models of the Justice Motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67:850–63.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. 1995. Collective Restraint in a Social Dilemma Situation: The Influence of Procedural Justice and Community Identification on the Empowerment and Legitimation of Authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:482–97.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. 1992. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Zanna, M., 25:115–91. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and McGraw, K. M. 1986. Ideology and the Interpretation of Personal Experience: Procedural Justice and Political Quiescence. Journal of Social Issues 42:115–28.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Mitchell, G. 1994- Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights. Duke Law Journal 43:703–815.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., and Smith, H. J. 1996. Understanding Why the Justice of Group Procedures Matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:913–30.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., and Huo, Y. J. 1995. Culture and Reactions to Authority: Social Categorization Effects on the Psychology of Authority. Paper on file with author.Google Scholar
Vermunt, R., Wit, A., van den Bos, K., and Lind, A. 1993. The Effect of Inaccurate Procedure on Protest: The Mediating Role of Perceived Unfairness and Situational Self-Esteem. Paper on file with author.Google Scholar
Wit, A. P. 1989. Group Efficiency and Fairness in Social Dilemmas: An Experimental Gaming Approach. Ph.D. diss., University of Groningen. Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar